• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消除自闭症和智力障碍个体的位置偏向反应。

Elimination of position-biased responding in individuals with autism and intellectual disabilities.

机构信息

New England Center for Children, Southborough, Massachusetts 01772, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Summer;45(2):241-50. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-241.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-241
PMID:22844134
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3405922/
Abstract

Five individuals with autism or other developmental disabilities participated in paired-stimulus preference assessments during repeated baseline probes. All subjects initially showed a pronounced bias by typically selecting the stimulus placed in either the left or right position. Biased responding for 3 subjects was eliminated when training trials were conducted in which a stimulus of known lesser quality was presented as one of the choices. Reinforcer-quality training was unsuccessful for 2 subjects, as was a condition in which reinforcer magnitude was modified to favor unbiased responding. These subjects' biased responding was eliminated only when a correction procedure (repetition of error trials) was implemented.

摘要

五名自闭症或其他发育障碍患者在重复基线探测期间参与了配对刺激偏好评估。所有受试者最初表现出明显的偏向,通常选择放置在左侧或右侧的刺激。当进行训练试验时,其中一个选择是呈现已知质量较低的刺激,3 名受试者的偏向反应就会消除。对于 2 名受试者,强化质量训练和改变强化物大小以促进无偏向反应的条件都不成功。只有当实施纠正程序(重复错误试验)时,这些受试者的偏向反应才会消除。

相似文献

1
Elimination of position-biased responding in individuals with autism and intellectual disabilities.消除自闭症和智力障碍个体的位置偏向反应。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Summer;45(2):241-50. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-241.
2
Evaluation of absolute and relative reinforcer value using progressive-ratio schedules.使用渐进比率程序评估绝对和相对强化物价值。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):189-202. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-189.
3
Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.评估单一刺激参与偏好评估的预测效度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):475-85. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-475.
4
Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.进一步研究影响对正强化与负强化偏好的因素。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Spring;40(1):25-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.151-05.
5
Effects of preference and reinforcer variation on within-session patterns of responding.偏好和强化物变化对.session 内反应模式的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Fall;45(3):637-41. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-637.
6
Assessing preference for social interactions.评估社交互动偏好。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jan;34(1):362-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.028. Epub 2012 Sep 23.
7
Reinforcement magnitude: an evaluation of preference and reinforcer efficacy.强化强度:偏好与强化物效能的评估
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):203-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-203.
8
Including unfamiliar stimuli in preference assessments for young children with autism.将不熟悉的刺激物纳入自闭症儿童偏好评估中。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Fall;46(3):689-94. doi: 10.1002/jaba.56. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
9
Increasing the efficiency of paired-stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference.通过识别偏好类别提高配对刺激偏好评估的效率。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Spring;48(1):221-6. doi: 10.1002/jaba.190.
10
A demonstration of individual preference for novel mands during functional communication training.在功能性沟通训练期间对新颖要求的个体偏好的一种展示。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Spring;42(1):185-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-185.

引用本文的文献

1
Mand Modality Preference Assessments among High- and Low-Tech Options for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Review.智力和发育障碍个体对高科技与低科技选项的方式偏好评估:一项系统综述
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Jul 6;17(1):228-245. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00829-6. eCollection 2024 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Empirical validation of a procedure to correct position and stimulus biases in matching-to-sample.对一种校正样本匹配中位置和刺激偏差程序的实证验证。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Jul;90(1):103-12. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-103.
2
Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings.强化率和强化质量对时间分配的影响:匹配理论在教育环境中的扩展。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Fall;25(3):691-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-691.
3
The Picture Exchange Communication System.图片交换沟通系统。
Behav Modif. 2001 Oct;25(5):725-44. doi: 10.1177/0145445501255004.
4
Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: implications for preference assessments.相对与绝对强化效应:对偏好评估的影响
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Winter;32(4):479-93. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-479.
5
Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.评估用于评估强化物偏好的多重刺激呈现形式。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):519-32; quiz 532-3. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.
6
Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: the interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality.患有严重情绪障碍的学生的冲动性:强化物频率、延迟和质量的交互作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):37-52. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-37.
7
Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance.评估强化物对有严重情绪障碍学生选择行为的影响维度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):575-83. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-575.
8
Modification of a response bias through differential amount of reinforcement.通过不同程度的强化来改变反应偏差。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jul;10(4):375-82. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-375.
9
Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.对重度智力迟钝个体的刺激偏好和强化物价值的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249-55. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249.
10
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.两种为重度和极重度残疾人士识别强化物方法的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.