• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期宫颈癌腹腔镜辅助阴式根治性子宫切除术及淋巴结清扫术与开腹手术的手术应激比较评估

Comparative evaluation of surgical stress of laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy and laparotomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

作者信息

Hou Cai-Ying, Li Xiu-Li, Jiang Feng, Gong Rong Jie, Guo Xin Yu, Yao Yuan-Qing

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853.

出版信息

Oncol Lett. 2011 Jul;2(4):747-752. doi: 10.3892/ol.2011.311. Epub 2011 May 13.

DOI:10.3892/ol.2011.311
PMID:22848260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3406333/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to objectively evaluate the benefits of laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Clinical data were prospectively collected from patients with IA-IIB cervical cancer who underwent laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (n1=33) and laparotomy (n2=30). Peripheral blood samples were obtained prior to surgery and at 1 and 2 h into the operation, as well as on days 1, 4 and 7 following surgery to measure serum interleukin-6, C-reaction protein and cortisol. Results showed that there was no conversion to laparotomy in the laparoscopy group. The average blood loss was 317.23±217.20 ml (laparoscopy group) and 872.58±693.16 ml (laparotomy group). No significant difference was found in the number of resected pelvic lymph nodes (19.74±7.43 in the laparoscopy group and 20.35±6.62 in the laparotomy group). At days 1 and 7 after surgery, the serum IL-6 level was significantly different in the laparoscopy and laparotomy groups (day 1: laparoscopy group 17.14±16.53 pg/ml and laparotomy group 34.32±20.97 pg/ml, p=0.001; day 7: laparoscopy group 6.7±7.21 pg/ml and laparotomy group 17.54±16.47 pg/ml, p=0.001). The serum CRP level was significantly different at days 1 and 7 after the operation (day 1: laparoscopy group 7024.72±949.12 ng/ml and laparotomy group 7586.61±869.42 ng/ml, p=0.018; day 7: laparoscopy group 4357.71±2108.85 ng/ml and laparotomy group 6967.96±995.02 ng/ml, p<0.001). A significant difference was noted in the serum cortisol level at day 4 after the operation (122.29±65.17 ng/ml in the laparoscopy group and 186.76±68.61 ng/ml in the laparotomy group, p<0.001). In conclusion, the differences in clinical data and the various parameters pertinent to surgical stress evaluated in this study suggest that laparoscopic surgery for cervical cancer causes less postoperative stress than conventional open surgery.

摘要

本研究的目的是客观评估腹腔镜辅助阴式根治性子宫切除术及淋巴结清扫术治疗早期宫颈癌的益处。前瞻性收集接受腹腔镜辅助阴式根治性子宫切除术(n1 = 33)和开腹手术(n2 = 30)的IA-IIB期宫颈癌患者的临床资料。在手术前、手术开始后1小时和2小时以及手术后第1、4和7天采集外周血样本,以检测血清白细胞介素-6、C反应蛋白和皮质醇。结果显示,腹腔镜组无中转开腹病例。平均失血量腹腔镜组为317.23±217.20 ml,开腹组为872.58±693.16 ml。切除的盆腔淋巴结数量差异无统计学意义(腹腔镜组为19.74±7.43,开腹组为20.35±6.62)。在术后第1天和第7天,腹腔镜组和开腹组的血清IL-6水平差异有统计学意义(第1天:腹腔镜组17.14±16.53 pg/ml,开腹组34.32±20.97 pg/ml,p = 0.001;第7天:腹腔镜组6.7±7.21 pg/ml,开腹组17.54±16.47 pg/ml,p = 0.001)。术后第1天和第7天血清CRP水平差异有统计学意义(第1天:腹腔镜组7024.72±949.12 ng/ml,开腹组7586.61±869.42 ng/ml,p = 0.018;第7天:腹腔镜组4357.71±2108.85 ng/ml,开腹组6967.96±995.02 ng/ml,p<0.001)。术后第4天血清皮质醇水平差异有统计学意义(腹腔镜组为122.29±65.17 ng/ml,开腹组为186.76±68.61 ng/ml,p<0.001)。总之,本研究评估的临床资料及与手术应激相关的各项参数的差异表明,宫颈癌腹腔镜手术比传统开放手术引起的术后应激更小。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of surgical stress of laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy and laparotomy for early-stage cervical cancer.早期宫颈癌腹腔镜辅助阴式根治性子宫切除术及淋巴结清扫术与开腹手术的手术应激比较评估
Oncol Lett. 2011 Jul;2(4):747-752. doi: 10.3892/ol.2011.311. Epub 2011 May 13.
2
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in endometrial carcinoma: prospective cohort study.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)与全子宫切除术(TAH)治疗子宫内膜癌的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 May;20(4):570-5. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d8b105.
3
Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.早期宫颈癌前哨淋巴结识别及根治性子宫切除术加淋巴结清扫术:腹腔镜手术与开腹手术对比
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):531-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.04.015. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
4
[Laparoscopy assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LAVRH) for cervical carcinoma--perioperative parameters and complications].腹腔镜辅助下宫颈癌根治性阴道子宫切除术(LAVRH)——围手术期参数及并发症
Zentralbl Gynakol. 2001 Mar;123(3):136-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-12510.
5
Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancers.全腹腔镜子宫切除术联合淋巴结清扫术在子宫内膜癌手术治疗中的评估
Ginekol Pol. 2013 Mar;84(3):197-205. doi: 10.17772/gp/1563.
6
A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.一项关于机器人辅助与开放手术子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗子宫内膜癌的前瞻性比较研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Feb;25(2):250-6. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000357.
7
[Preliminary study on laparoscopically robotic assisted radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy on cervical cancer.].
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Nov;44(11):828-31.
8
Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer.腹腔镜辅助下根治性阴道切除术与Ⅱ型根治性腹式子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的比较
Surg Endosc. 2001 Mar;15(3):289-92. doi: 10.1007/s004640000306. Epub 2000 Dec 12.
9
[Clinical evaluation of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with cervical cancer].[腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术联合盆腔及腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术的临床评估]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2003 Jul;38(7):409-11.
10
["Learning curve" robotic radical hysterectomy compared to standardized laparoscopy assisted radical vaginal and open radical hysterectomy].["学习曲线”下机器人根治性子宫切除术与标准化腹腔镜辅助根治性阴道切除术及开放性根治性子宫切除术的比较]
Ceska Gynekol. 2013 Jan;78(1):20-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for treating cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜辅助根治性阴道子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的疗效评估:一项荟萃分析
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Mar;17(1):69-82. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.106126. Epub 2021 May 14.
2
Morbidity after surgical management of cervical cancer in low and middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.中低收入国家宫颈癌手术治疗后的发病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 3;14(7):e0217775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217775. eCollection 2019.
3
Impact of hospital care volume on clinical outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.医院护理量对宫颈癌腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术临床结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(49):e13445. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013445.
4
Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer: A retrospective study.早期宫颈癌患者腹腔镜辅助根治性阴道子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(36):e8005. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008005.
5
Total Laparoscopic Versus Laparotomic Radical Hysterectomy and Lymphadenectomy in Cervical Cancer: An Observational Study of 13-Year Experience.宫颈癌全腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术及淋巴结清扫术:一项13年经验的观察性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(30):e1264. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001264.
6
Clinical observation of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.腹腔镜宫颈癌根治术的临床观察
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 May 15;7(5):1373-7. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
The early IL-6 and IL-10 response in trauma is correlated with injury severity and mortality.创伤早期白细胞介素-6和白细胞介素-10反应与损伤严重程度及死亡率相关。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Apr;53(4):515-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01801.x.
2
Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases.采用浦那技术的腹腔镜全子宫根治术:我们248例的经验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):682-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.05.007.
3
Is laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma safe? A case control study with follow up.腹腔镜辅助根治性阴式子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌安全吗?一项随访病例对照研究。
BJOG. 2007 May;114(5):537-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01291.x. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
4
Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (Coelio-Schauta): A comparison with open Wertheim/Meigs hysterectomy.腹腔镜辅助根治性阴道子宫切除术(Coelio-Schauta术):与开放式Wertheim/Meigs子宫切除术的比较
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006 Sep-Oct;16(5):1927-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00661.x.
5
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy.腹腔镜辅助下经阴道根治性子宫切除术
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Jun;19(3):377-86. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.12.001. Epub 2005 Jan 25.
6
Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study.腹腔镜辅助根治性阴道子宫切除术与根治性腹式子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的匹配对照研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Dec;95(3):655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.055.
7
Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies.妇科肿瘤中心经腹淋巴结清扫术的引入:650例腹腔镜盆腔和/或腹主动脉旁经腹淋巴结清扫术分析
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Oct;95(1):52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.025.
8
A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.腹腔镜辅助根治性阴道子宫切除术与根治性腹式子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的比较
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Jun;93(3):588-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.04.003.
9
Comparative study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer.早期宫颈癌患者腹腔镜-阴道根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术的比较研究
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Jan;92(1):277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.09.003.
10
Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH): prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer.腹腔镜辅助根治性阴道子宫切除术(LARVH):200例宫颈癌患者的前瞻性评估
Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Sep;90(3):505-11. doi: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00378-0.