• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[头颈部癌症患者基于计算机的生活质量监测:使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷C30和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织头颈部癌症问卷35葡萄牙语个人电脑软件版本的验证模型]

[Computer-based quality-of-life monitoring in head and neck cancer patients: a validation model using the EORTC-QLQ C30 and EORTC- H&N35 Portuguese PC-software version].

作者信息

Silveira Augusta, Gonçalves Joaquim, Sequeira Teresa, Ribeiro Cláudia, Lopes Carlos, Monteiro Eurico, Pimentel Francisco Luís

机构信息

Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Centro de Estudos e Inverstigação em Saúde, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Acta Med Port. 2011 Dec;24 Suppl 2:347-54. Epub 2011 Dec 31.

PMID:22849922
Abstract

Quality of Life is a distinct and important emerging health focus, guiding practice and research. The routine Quality of Life evaluation in clinical, economic, and epidemiological studies and in medical practice promises a better Quality of Life and improved health resources optimization. The use of information technology and a Knowledge Management System related to Quality of Life assessment is essential to routine clinical evaluation and can define a clinical research methodology that is more efficient and better organized. In this paper, a Validation Model using the Quality of Life informatics platform is presented. Portuguese PC-software using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires (EORTC-QLQ C30 and EORTC-H&N35), is compared with the original paper-pen approach in the Quality of Life monitoring of head and neck cancer patients. The Quality of Life informatics platform was designed specifically for this study with a simple and intuitive interface that ensures confidentiality while providing Quality of Life evaluation for all cancer patients. For the Validation Model, the sample selection was random. Fifty-four head and neck cancer patients completed 216 questionnaires (108 using the informatics platform and 108 using the original paper-pen approach) with a one-hour interval in between. Patient preferences and computer experience were registered. Quality of Life informatics platform showed high usability as a user-friendly tool. This informatics platform allows data collection by auto-reply, database construction, and statistical data analysis and also facilitates the automatic listing of the questionnaires. When comparing the approaches (Wilcoxon test by item, percentile distribution and Cronbach's alpha), most of the responses were similar. Most of the patients (53.6%) reported a preference for the software version. The Quality of Life informatics platform has revealed to be a powerful and effective tool, allowing a real time analysis of Quality of Life data. Computer-based quality-of-life monitoring in head and neck cancer patients is essential to get clinically meaningful data that can support clinical decisions, identify potential needs, and support a stepped-care model. This represents a fundamental step for routine Quality of Life implementation in the Oncology Portuguese Institute (IPO-Porto), ORL and C&P department services clinical practice. Finally, we propose a diagram of diagnostic performance, considerating the generalized lack of mycological diagnosis in Portugal, which emphasizes the need for a careful history, focused on quantifying the latency period.

摘要

生活质量是一个独特且重要的新兴健康关注点,指导着实践与研究。在临床、经济和流行病学研究以及医疗实践中进行常规生活质量评估有望带来更好的生活质量并改善健康资源优化。使用信息技术以及与生活质量评估相关的知识管理系统对于常规临床评估至关重要,并且可以定义一种更高效、组织更完善的临床研究方法。本文介绍了一种使用生活质量信息学平台的验证模型。将使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织问卷(EORTC - QLQ C30和EORTC - H&N35)的葡萄牙语PC软件与在头颈部癌症患者生活质量监测中使用的原始纸笔方法进行比较。生活质量信息学平台是专门为该研究设计的,具有简单直观的界面,在为所有癌症患者提供生活质量评估的同时确保保密性。对于验证模型,样本选择是随机的。54名头颈部癌症患者完成了216份问卷(108份使用信息学平台,108份使用原始纸笔方法),中间间隔一小时。记录了患者的偏好和计算机使用经验。生活质量信息学平台作为一个用户友好的工具显示出高可用性。这个信息学平台允许通过自动回复进行数据收集、数据库构建和统计数据分析,还便于问卷的自动列表。在比较这两种方法时(按项目进行威尔科克森检验、百分位数分布和克朗巴哈系数),大多数回答相似。大多数患者(53.6%)表示更喜欢软件版本。生活质量信息学平台已被证明是一个强大而有效的工具,能够对生活质量数据进行实时分析。对头颈部癌症患者进行基于计算机的生活质量监测对于获取可支持临床决策、识别潜在需求并支持分级护理模式的具有临床意义的数据至关重要。这是在葡萄牙肿瘤研究所(IPO - 波尔图)、耳鼻喉科和颌面外科部门服务临床实践中常规实施生活质量的一个基本步骤。最后,考虑到葡萄牙真菌学诊断普遍缺乏的情况,我们提出了一个诊断性能图表,强调了需要仔细询问病史,重点是量化潜伏期。

相似文献

1
[Computer-based quality-of-life monitoring in head and neck cancer patients: a validation model using the EORTC-QLQ C30 and EORTC- H&N35 Portuguese PC-software version].[头颈部癌症患者基于计算机的生活质量监测:使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷C30和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织头颈部癌症问卷35葡萄牙语个人电脑软件版本的验证模型]
Acta Med Port. 2011 Dec;24 Suppl 2:347-54. Epub 2011 Dec 31.
2
Validation of the Mexican Spanish version of the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 instrument to measure health-related quality of life in patients with head and neck cancers.验证 EORTC QLQ-H&N35 量表墨西哥西班牙语版用于测量头颈部癌症患者健康相关生活质量的适用性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 May;20(5):1417-26. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2712-9. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
3
Assessment of change of quality of life in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in a Korean sample.使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)对韩国样本中接受癌症疼痛管理的晚期患者的生活质量变化进行评估。
Oncology. 2008;74 Suppl 1:7-12. doi: 10.1159/000143212. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
4
Quality of life of head and neck cancer patient: validation of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30 and European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-H&N 35 in Indian patients.头颈癌患者的生活质量:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-H&N 35在印度患者中的验证。
Indian J Cancer. 2005 Oct-Dec;42(4):178-84.
5
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.
6
Validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 in patients with laryngeal cancer after surgery.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷C30(EORTC QLQ-C30)和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织头颈癌问卷35(EORTC QLQ-H&N35)在喉癌术后患者中的验证
Head Neck. 2009 Jan;31(1):64-76. doi: 10.1002/hed.20938.
7
Health-related quality of life in patients with lung cancer: validation of the Mexican-Spanish version and association with prognosis of the EORTC QLQ-LC13 questionnaire.肺癌患者的健康相关生活质量:EORTC QLQ-LC13 问卷的墨西哥西班牙语版验证及其与预后的关系。
Lung Cancer. 2012 Jul;77(1):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
8
Assessing quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer in Spain by means of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35.采用 EORTC QLQ-C30 和 QLQ-H&N35 评估西班牙头颈部癌症患者的生活质量。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Oct;40(7):614-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.01.011. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
9
Validation of the Mexican Spanish version of the EORTC C30 and STO22 questionnaires for the evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients with gastric cancer.用于评估胃癌患者健康相关生活质量的欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)C30和STO22问卷墨西哥西班牙语版本的验证
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jan;16(1):88-95. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0175-9. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
10
[The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Japanese patients with head and neck cancer--the Japanese version of QLQ-H&N35].[欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)日本头颈癌患者生活质量问卷——QLQ-H&N35日本版]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2004 Mar;31(3):461-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Head and Neck Cancer: Improving Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Clinical Practice.头颈部癌症:改善临床实践中的患者报告结局测量。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;19(11):59. doi: 10.1007/s11864-018-0578-1.
2
Assessing whether EORTC QLQ-30 and FACT-G measure the same constructs of quality of life in patients with total laryngectomy.评估 EORTC QLQ-30 和 FACT-G 在全喉切除患者中测量生命质量的相同结构。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Sep 14;16(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1012-x.
3
Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures.
电子和纸质患者报告结局测量的等效性。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Aug;24(8):1949-61. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0937-3. Epub 2015 Feb 22.
4
Further evaluation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 psychometric properties in a large Brazilian cancer patient cohort as a function of their educational status.进一步评估 EORTC QLQ-C30 心理测量特性在一个大型巴西癌症患者队列中,作为其教育状况的函数。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Aug;22(8):2151-60. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2206-3. Epub 2014 Mar 21.