Suppr超能文献

微生物合作中的协同作用和群体规模。

Synergy and group size in microbial cooperation.

机构信息

Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX4 1YL, UK.

出版信息

Am Nat. 2012 Sep;180(3):296-305. doi: 10.1086/667193. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

Abstract

Microbes produce many molecules that are important for their growth and development, and the exploitation of these secretions by nonproducers has recently become an important paradigm in microbial social evolution. Although the production of these public-goods molecules has been studied intensely, little is known of how the benefits accrued and the costs incurred depend on the quantity of public-goods molecules produced. We focus here on the relationship between the shape of the benefit curve and cellular density, using a model assuming three types of benefit functions: diminishing, accelerating, and sigmoidal (accelerating and then diminishing). We classify the latter two as being synergistic and argue that sigmoidal curves are common in microbial systems. Synergistic benefit curves interact with group sizes to give very different expected evolutionary dynamics. In particular, we show that whether and to what extent microbes evolve to produce public goods depends strongly on group size. We show that synergy can create an "evolutionary trap" that can stymie the establishment and maintenance of cooperation. By allowing density-dependent regulation of production (quorum sensing), we show how this trap may be avoided. We discuss the implications of our results on experimental design.

摘要

微生物产生许多对其生长和发育很重要的分子,而非生产者对这些分泌物的开发利用最近已成为微生物社会进化中的一个重要范例。尽管这些公共利益分子的产生已经被深入研究,但对于收益和成本如何取决于公共利益分子的产生数量却知之甚少。我们在这里重点研究收益曲线的形状与细胞密度之间的关系,使用了一个假设三种收益函数的模型:递减、加速和 S 形(先加速后递减)。我们将后两种归为协同作用,并认为 S 形曲线在微生物系统中很常见。协同作用的收益曲线与群体规模相互作用,会产生非常不同的预期进化动态。特别是,我们表明,微生物是否以及在何种程度上进化为产生公共利益品强烈取决于群体规模。我们表明,协同作用可能会造成一种“进化陷阱”,从而阻碍合作的建立和维持。通过允许生产的密度依赖性调节(群体感应),我们展示了如何避免这种陷阱。我们讨论了我们的研究结果对实验设计的影响。

相似文献

1
Synergy and group size in microbial cooperation.微生物合作中的协同作用和群体规模。
Am Nat. 2012 Sep;180(3):296-305. doi: 10.1086/667193. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
5
Social conflict drives the evolutionary divergence of quorum sensing.社会冲突推动群体感应的进化分歧。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13635-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102923108. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
8
Cooperation, clumping and the evolution of multicellularity.合作、聚集与多细胞性的进化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Aug 22;282(1813):20151075. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1075.
10
The Evolution of Quorum Sensing as a Mechanism to Infer Kinship.群体感应作为一种推断亲缘关系机制的演变
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Apr 27;12(4):e1004848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004848. eCollection 2016 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
Black Queen Hypothesis, partial privatization, and quorum sensing evolution.黑皇后假说、部分私有化和群体感应进化。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 30;17(11):e0278449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278449. eCollection 2022.
6
8
Crystal toxins and the volunteer's dilemma in bacteria.晶体毒素与细菌中的志愿者困境。
J Evol Biol. 2019 Apr;32(4):310-319. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13415. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
9
Pleiotropy, cooperation, and the social evolution of genetic architecture.多效性、协同作用与遗传结构的社会进化。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Oct 25;16(10):e2006671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006671. eCollection 2018 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
QUORUM SENSING AND GROUP SELECTION.群体感应与群体选择
Evolution. 1998 Oct;52(5):1263-1269. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02007.x.
2
The genetical structure of populations.种群的遗传结构。
Ann Eugen. 1951 Mar;15(4):323-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1949.tb02451.x.
4
Consequences of fluctuating group size for the evolution of cooperation.群体规模波动对合作进化的影响。
J Math Biol. 2011 Aug;63(2):263-81. doi: 10.1007/s00285-010-0367-3. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
5
Molecular and regulatory properties of a public good shape the evolution of cooperation.公共物品的分子和调控特性塑造了合作的进化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 2;107(44):18921-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011154107. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
9
What traits are carried on mobile genetic elements, and why?移动遗传元件携带哪些性状,原因是什么?
Heredity (Edinb). 2011 Jan;106(1):1-10. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2010.24. Epub 2010 Mar 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验