Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit and UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e42202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042202. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
The correlates of physical activity in adults are relatively well studied. However, many studies use self-reported ('reported') measures of activity and we know little about the possible differences between the correlates of reported and objective ('recorded') measures of physical activity. We compared the correlates of reported and recorded time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in a sample of working adults.
In 2009, participants in the Commuting and Health in Cambridge study completed questionnaires assessing individual, socio-demographic, health and contextual characteristics. Recorded time spent in MVPA over seven days was ascertained using accelerometers and reported time spent in MVPA was assessed using the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ). Correlates of MVPA were investigated using sex-specific linear regression models.
486 participants (70% women) provided both reported and recorded physical activity data. 89% recorded at least 30 minutes of MVPA per day. In men, none of the potential explanatory variables were associated with both reported and recorded time spent in MVPA. In women, of all the potential explanatory variables only that of having a standing or manual occupation was associated with both reported (+42 min/day; 95% CI 16.4 to 68.4, p = 0.001) and recorded (+9 min/day; 95% CI: 3.5 to 15.7, p = 0.002) time spent in MVPA.
The use of an objective measure of physical activity may influence the correlates which are observed. Researchers may wish to consider using and analysing recorded and reported measures in combination to gain a more complete view of the correlates of physical activity.
成年人身体活动的相关因素已得到较为充分的研究。然而,许多研究使用自我报告(“报告”)的活动测量方法,对于报告和客观(“记录”)身体活动测量方法的相关因素之间可能存在的差异,我们知之甚少。我们比较了工作成年人样本中报告和记录的中等到剧烈体力活动(MVPA)时间的相关因素。
2009 年,剑桥通勤与健康研究的参与者完成了调查问卷,评估了个体、社会人口统计学、健康和环境特征。使用加速度计确定了 7 天内 MVPA 的记录时间,使用近期体力活动问卷(RPAQ)评估了 MVPA 的报告时间。使用性别特异性线性回归模型研究 MVPA 的相关因素。
486 名参与者(70%为女性)提供了报告和记录的体力活动数据。89%的参与者记录了至少 30 分钟的 MVPA。在男性中,没有任何潜在的解释变量与报告和记录的 MVPA 时间相关。在女性中,所有潜在的解释变量中,只有站立或体力工作的职业与报告(+42 分钟/天;95%CI 16.4 至 68.4,p=0.001)和记录(+9 分钟/天;95%CI:3.5 至 15.7,p=0.002)的 MVPA 时间均相关。
使用客观的体力活动测量方法可能会影响观察到的相关因素。研究人员可能希望考虑同时使用和分析记录和报告的测量方法,以更全面地了解体力活动的相关因素。