• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多重轴II障碍的诊断有临床意义吗?

Does the diagnosis of multiple Axis II disorders have clinical significance?

作者信息

Zimmerman Mark, Galione Janine N, Chelminski Iwona, Young Diane, Dalrymple Kristy, Morgan Theresa A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;24(3):195-201.

PMID:22860239
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A stated goal of the DSM-5 Work Group on Personality and Personality Disorders (PDs) has been to reduce the high rate of comorbidity among PDs. Few studies have examined whether the diagnosis of multiple PDs has clinical significance. In the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services project, we tested the hypothesis that patients with >1 DSM-IV PD would have more severe forms of psychopathology than patients who were diagnosed with only 1 DSM-IV PD.

METHODS

A total of 2,150 psychiatric outpatients were evaluated with semi-structured diagnostic interviews for DSM-IV Axis I and Axis II disorders and measures of psychosocial morbidity.

RESULTS

For 8 of the 10 PDs, the majority of patients had at least 1 additional PD, although at least 20% of patients diagnosed with each PD were diagnosed with only 1 PD. Compared with patients with 1 PD, patients with ≥2 PDs had significantly more psychosocial morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

The co-occurrence of PDs conveys clinically significant information. Moreover, despite high levels of comorbidity, each PD also existed as a stand-alone entity. These findings raise questions about the DSM-5 Work Group's emphasis on reducing comorbidity in Axis II.

摘要

背景

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)人格与人格障碍工作组的既定目标之一是降低人格障碍(PDs)之间的高共病率。很少有研究探讨多重人格障碍的诊断是否具有临床意义。在罗德岛改善诊断评估与服务方法项目的本报告中,我们检验了这样一个假设,即患有超过1种DSM - IV人格障碍的患者比仅被诊断患有1种DSM - IV人格障碍的患者具有更严重形式的精神病理学表现。

方法

对总共2150名精神科门诊患者进行了针对DSM - IV轴I和轴II障碍的半结构化诊断访谈以及心理社会发病率测量。

结果

在10种人格障碍中的8种中,大多数患者至少还有1种其他人格障碍,尽管每种人格障碍的诊断患者中至少有20%仅被诊断出患有1种人格障碍。与患有1种人格障碍的患者相比,患有≥2种人格障碍的患者具有显著更多的心理社会发病率。

结论

人格障碍的共病传递了具有临床意义的信息。此外,尽管共病水平很高,但每种人格障碍也作为一个独立实体存在。这些发现对DSM - 5工作组强调降低轴II中的共病率提出了疑问。

相似文献

1
Does the diagnosis of multiple Axis II disorders have clinical significance?多重轴II障碍的诊断有临床意义吗?
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;24(3):195-201.
2
Which DSM-IV personality disorders are most strongly associated with indices of psychosocial morbidity in psychiatric outpatients?在精神科门诊患者中,哪些 DSM-IV 人格障碍与心理社会发病率的指标关联最强?
Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;53(7):940-5. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
3
Personality disorders predict relapse after remission from an episode of major depressive disorder: a 6-year prospective study.人格障碍可预测重性抑郁障碍发作缓解后的复发:一项 6 年前瞻性研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;71(12):1629-35. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04200gre. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
4
Heterogeneity of borderline personality disorder: do the number of criteria met make a difference?边缘型人格障碍的异质性:满足的标准数量有影响吗?
J Pers Disord. 2007 Dec;21(6):615-25. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.6.615.
5
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
6
Disentangling depressive personality disorder from avoidant, borderline, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders.区分抑郁型人格障碍与回避型、边缘型和强迫型人格障碍。
Compr Psychiatry. 2006 Jul-Aug;47(4):298-306. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2005.09.002. Epub 2006 Apr 19.
7
Prevalence of personality disorders using two diagnostic systems in psychiatric outpatients in Shanghai, China: a comparison of uni-axial and multi-axial formulation.采用两种诊断系统在中国上海精神科门诊患者中人格障碍的患病率:单一轴和多轴表述的比较。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;47(9):1409-17. doi: 10.1007/s00127-011-0445-x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
8
Impact of deleting 5 DSM-IV personality disorders on prevalence, comorbidity, and the association between personality disorder pathology and psychosocial morbidity.删除 DSM-IV 人格障碍中的 5 种障碍对患病率、共病和人格障碍病理与心理社会发病率之间的关联的影响。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;73(2):202-7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07140. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
9
The relationship between anxiety disorders and dimensional representations of DSM-IV personality disorders: A co-twin control study.焦虑症与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)人格障碍维度表征之间的关系:一项双胞胎对照研究。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:349-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.038. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
10
Relationships of neuroticism and extraversion with axis I and II comorbidity among patients with DSM-IV major depressive disorder.DSM-IV 重度抑郁症患者中神经质和外向性与轴 I 和轴 II 共病的关系。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):110-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.011. Epub 2008 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality disorders: the impact of severity on societal costs.人格障碍:严重程度对社会成本的影响。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Feb;275(1):181-192. doi: 10.1007/s00406-023-01715-6. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
2
Mental health disorders, functioning and health-related quality of life among extensively hospitalized patients due to severe self-harm - results from the Extreme Challenges project.因严重自残而长期住院患者的心理健康障碍、功能及与健康相关的生活质量——来自极端挑战项目的结果
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 18;14:1258025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1258025. eCollection 2023.
3
Dimensional models of personality disorders: Challenges and opportunities.
人格障碍的维度模型:挑战与机遇。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 7;14:1098452. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1098452. eCollection 2023.
4
Frequency of narcissistic personality disorder in a counseling center population in China.中国咨询中心人群中自恋型人格障碍的频率。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2185-5.
5
The severity of psychiatric disorders.精神疾病的严重程度。
World Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;17(3):258-275. doi: 10.1002/wps.20569.
6
Mentalization-based treatment or psychodynamic treatment programmes for patients with borderline personality disorder - the impact of clinical severity.基于心理化的治疗或精神动力学治疗方案对边缘型人格障碍患者的影响 - 临床严重程度的作用。
Psychol Psychother. 2019 Mar;92(1):91-111. doi: 10.1111/papt.12179. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
7
A compromise solution between overlapping and overlooking DSM personality disorders in Chinese psychiatric practice.在中文精神科实践中,重叠和忽视 DSM 人格障碍之间的妥协解决方案。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;53(1):99-106. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1444-3. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
8
What do clinicians treat: Diagnoses or symptoms? The incremental validity of a symptom-based, dimensional characterization of emotional disorders in predicting medication prescription patterns.临床医生治疗的是:诊断还是症状?基于症状的、情绪障碍维度特征对预测药物处方模式的增量有效性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;79:80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 18.