Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠用于电休克治疗的比较。

A comparison of propofol and thiopentone for electroconvulsive therapy.

作者信息

Kumar Alok, Sharma Devendra Kumar, Mani Raghunandan

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Guwahati, Assam, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jul;28(3):353-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.98337.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare propofol and thiopental as anesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) with respect to seizure duration, stimulus charge, and clinical effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized, blinded study of 28 patients of depression treated with bilateral ECT. In group P (n = 14), sedation was achieved with propofol 1.5 mg/kg, whereas in group T (n = 14), it was achieved with thiopentone 3 mg/ kg IV. Succinylcholine 0.4 mg/kg intravenous was given in all patients as for neuromuscular blockade.

RESULTS

The mean seizure duration of the patients in the thiopental group was 83 ± 34.43 seconds vs. 94.45 ± 21.37 seconds in the propofol group (P < 0.01). The energy delivered per treatment was 10.88 ± 4.78 J in the thiopental group vs. 12.20 ± 4.53 J in the propofol group (P < 0.05). Number of ECTs required were significantly higher in propofol group (9.71 ± 2.87) as compared to thiopental group (5.86 ± 0.36) P < 0.0001. No significant difference in duration of hospitalization was seen in both groups. The mean score on Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was 29.14 in the thiopental group vs. 29.57 in the propofol group (P > 0.05). The mean score on Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was 7.14 in the thiopental group vs. 3.29 in the propofol group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol significantly increases number of ECT required to treat although the patients received higher electrical charge and had longer seizure duration. BDI scores suggest this resulted in better outcome. Results, however, might be confounded by the differences in pharmacological treatment in the groups.

摘要

目的

比较丙泊酚和硫喷妥钠作为电休克治疗(ECT)麻醉剂时在癫痫发作持续时间、刺激电量和临床效果方面的差异。

材料与方法

对28例接受双侧ECT治疗的抑郁症患者进行随机双盲研究。P组(n = 14)采用1.5 mg/kg丙泊酚镇静,而T组(n = 14)采用3 mg/kg硫喷妥钠静脉注射镇静。所有患者均静脉注射0.4 mg/kg琥珀酰胆碱进行神经肌肉阻滞。

结果

硫喷妥钠组患者的平均癫痫发作持续时间为83 ± 34.43秒,丙泊酚组为94.45 ± 21.37秒(P < 0.01)。硫喷妥钠组每次治疗的能量为10.88 ± 4.78 J,丙泊酚组为12.20 ± 4.53 J(P < 0.05)。丙泊酚组所需ECT治疗次数(9.71 ± 2.87)显著高于硫喷妥钠组(5.86 ± 0.36),P < 0.0001。两组住院时间无显著差异。简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)平均得分硫喷妥钠组为29.14,丙泊酚组为29.57(P > 0.05)。贝克抑郁量表(BDI)平均得分硫喷妥钠组为7.14,丙泊酚组为3.29(P < 0.05)。

结论

尽管患者接受了更高的电量和更长的癫痫发作持续时间,但丙泊酚显著增加了治疗所需的ECT次数。BDI评分表明这带来了更好的治疗效果。然而,结果可能因两组药物治疗的差异而受到混淆。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38a8/3409947/3fa77393d2fe/JOACP-28-353-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验