University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Aug 8;13:141. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-141.
A minimal invasive approach for elective hip surgery has been implemented in our institution in the past. It is widely hypothesized that implanting artificial hips in a minimal invasive fashion decreases surgical trauma and is helpful in the rehabilitation process in elective hip surgery. Thereby geriatric patients requiring emergency hip surgery also could theoretically benefit from a procedure that involves less tissue trauma.
Sixty patients who sustained a fractured neck of femur were randomly assigned into two groups. In the minimal invasive arm, the so called "direct anterior approach" (DAA) was chosen, in the conventional arm the Watson-Jones-Approach was used for implantation of a bipolar hemi-arthroplasty.Primary outcome parameter was the mobility as measured by the four-item-Barthel index. Secondary outcome parameters included pain, haemoglobin-levels, complications, duration of surgery, administration of blood transfusion and external length of incision. Radiographs were evaluated.
A statistically significant difference (p = 0,009) regarding the mobility as measured with the four-item Barthel index was found at the 5th postoperative day, favouring the DAA. Evaluation of the intensity of pain with a visual analogue scale (VAS) showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0,035) at day 16. No difference was evident in the comparison of radiographic results.
Comparing two different approaches to the hip joint for the implantation of a bipolar hemi-arthroplasty after fractured neck of femur, it can be stated that mobilization status is improved for the DAA compared to the WJA when measured by the four-item Barthel index, there is less pain as measured using the VAS. There is no radiographic evidence that a minimal invasive technique leads to inferior implant position.
Level II therapeutic study.
在我们机构过去已经采用了微创方法进行择期髋关节手术。广泛假设微创植入人工髋关节可以减少手术创伤,并有助于择期髋关节手术的康复过程。因此,理论上需要紧急髋关节手术的老年患者也可以从涉及较少组织创伤的手术中受益。
60 名股骨颈骨折患者被随机分为两组。在微创组中,选择所谓的“直接前入路”(DAA),在常规组中,使用 Watson-Jones 入路植入双极半髋关节置换术。主要观察指标是四项巴氏量表(Barthel Index)评估的活动能力。次要观察指标包括疼痛、血红蛋白水平、并发症、手术时间、输血和切口长度。评估 X 光片。
术后第 5 天,使用四项巴氏量表评估活动能力的结果有统计学意义(p=0.009),DAA 组更优。使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛强度的结果在第 16 天有统计学差异(p=0.035)。X 光片评估结果无差异。
比较两种不同方法植入双极半髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折,使用四项巴氏量表评估,DAA 组的活动能力改善优于 WJA 组,VAS 评估的疼痛程度较轻。X 光片无证据表明微创技术会导致植入物位置不佳。
II 级治疗研究。