• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第四章:为评估控烟效果而构建反事实吸烟史的发展历程。

Chapter 4: Development of the counterfactual smoking histories used to assess the effects of tobacco control.

机构信息

Yale School of Public Health, 60 College St., New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S39-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01759.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01759.x
PMID:22882891
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3490210/
Abstract

Publication of the Surgeon General's Report in 1964 marshaled evidence of the harm to public health caused by cigarette smoking, including lung cancer mortality, and provided an impetus for introducing control programs. The purpose of this article is to develop estimates of their effect on basic smoking exposure input parameters related to introduction of the report. Fundamental inputs used to generate exposure to cigarettes are initiation and cessation rates for men and women, as well as the distribution of the number of cigarettes smoked per day. These fundamental quantities are presented for three scenarios: actual tobacco control in the United States; no tobacco control in which the experience before 1955 was assumed to continue; and complete tobacco control in which all smoking ceased following publication of the report. These results were derived using data from National Health Interview Surveys, and they provide basic input parameters for the Smoking History Generator used by each of the lung cancer models developed by the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network.

摘要

1964 年发布的《外科医生报告》汇集了吸烟对公众健康造成的危害的证据,包括肺癌死亡率,并为引入控制计划提供了动力。本文的目的是估计报告发布对与报告引入相关的基本吸烟暴露输入参数的影响。生成吸烟暴露的基本输入是男性和女性的开始吸烟和停止吸烟的比率,以及每天吸烟的数量分布。这些基本数量呈现了三种情况:美国实际的烟草控制;假设 1955 年之前的经验继续的情况下没有烟草控制;以及报告发布后所有吸烟都停止的情况下完全的烟草控制。这些结果是使用国家健康访谈调查的数据得出的,它们为癌症干预和监测建模网络开发的每个肺癌模型使用的吸烟史生成器提供了基本输入参数。

相似文献

1
Chapter 4: Development of the counterfactual smoking histories used to assess the effects of tobacco control.第四章:为评估控烟效果而构建反事实吸烟史的发展历程。
Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S39-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01759.x.
2
Chapter 1:The impact of the reduction in tobacco smoking on U.S. lung cancer mortality, 1975-2000: an introduction to the problem.第一章:1975-2000 年美国吸烟减少对肺癌死亡率的影响:问题简介。
Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32 Suppl 1(0 1):S6-S13. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01745.x.
3
Tobacco control and the reduction in smoking-related premature deaths in the United States, 1964-2012.美国的烟草控制与减少与吸烟有关的过早死亡人数(1964-2012 年)。
JAMA. 2014 Jan 8;311(2):164-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.285112.
4
Chapter 5: Actual and counterfactual smoking prevalence rates in the U.S. population via microsimulation.第五章:通过微观模拟研究美国人口的实际和假设吸烟率。
Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S51-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01775.x.
5
Surveillance for selected tobacco-use behaviors--United States, 1900-1994.美国1900 - 1994年特定烟草使用行为监测
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1994 Nov 18;43(3):1-43.
6
Comparison of Smoking History Patterns Among African American and White Cohorts in the United States Born 1890 to 1990.美国1890年至1990年出生的非裔美国人和白人队列吸烟史模式比较
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Apr;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S16-29. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv274.
7
Youth tobacco surveillance--United States, 2000.2000年美国青少年烟草监测
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2001 Nov 2;50(4):1-84.
8
Cigarette Consumption and Cigarette Smoking Prevalence Among Adults in Kansas.堪萨斯州成年人的香烟消费量及吸烟率
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jun 11;12:E93. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150011.
9
Projecting the effects of tobacco control policies in the USA through microsimulation: a study protocol.通过微观模拟预测美国烟草控制政策的效果:一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 23;8(3):e019169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019169.
10
Gauging the Effect of U.S. Tobacco Control Policies From 1965 Through 2014 Using SimSmoke.使用SimSmoke评估1965年至2014年美国烟草控制政策的效果。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Apr;50(4):535-542. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Smoking Histories by State in the U.S.美国各州的吸烟史
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Apr;64(4 Suppl 1):S42-S52. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.08.018. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
2
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography and a Diagnostic Biomarker.低剂量计算机断层扫描联合诊断生物标志物用于肺癌筛查的成本效果分析。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Oct 6;5(6). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab081. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
A risk-based framework for assessing real-time lung cancer screening eligibility that incorporates life expectancy and past screening findings.一种基于风险的框架,用于评估实时肺癌筛查的资格,该框架纳入了预期寿命和既往筛查结果。
Cancer. 2021 Dec 1;127(23):4432-4446. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33835. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
4
Modeling Strategies to Optimize Cancer Screening in USPSTF Guideline-Noncompliant Women.优化美国预防服务工作组指南中不符合筛查标准女性癌症筛查的建模策略
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;7(6):885-894. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0952.
5
Disparities of National Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines in the US Population.美国人群中肺癌筛查指南的差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Nov 1;112(11):1136-1142. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa013.
6
Predicting the Epidemiological Dynamics of Lung Cancer in Japan.预测日本肺癌的流行病学动态。
J Clin Med. 2019 Mar 8;8(3):326. doi: 10.3390/jcm8030326.
7
Stochastic Counterfactual Risk Analysis for the Vulnerability Assessment of Cyber-Physical Attacks on Electricity Distribution Infrastructure Networks.基于随机反事实风险分析的电网基础设施网络中电力线通信网络脆弱性评估
Risk Anal. 2019 Sep;39(9):2012-2031. doi: 10.1111/risa.13291. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
8
Population impact of lung cancer screening in the United States: Projections from a microsimulation model.美国肺癌筛查的人口影响:基于微观模拟模型的预测。
PLoS Med. 2018 Feb 7;15(2):e1002506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002506. eCollection 2018 Feb.
9
Evaluating the impact of varied compliance to lung cancer screening recommendations using a microsimulation model.使用微观模拟模型评估不同程度遵守肺癌筛查建议的影响。
Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Sep;28(9):947-958. doi: 10.1007/s10552-017-0907-x. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
10
The impact of overdiagnosis on the selection of efficient lung cancer screening strategies.过度诊断对高效肺癌筛查策略选择的影响。
Int J Cancer. 2017 Jun 1;140(11):2436-2443. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30602.

本文引用的文献

1
Chapter 8: The FHCRC lung cancer model.第八章:FHCRC 肺癌模型。
Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S99-S116. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01681.x.
2
Chapter 7: Description of MISCAN-lung, the Erasmus MC Lung Cancer microsimulation model for evaluating cancer control interventions.第七章:MISCAN-lung 描述,即评估癌症控制干预措施的伊拉斯谟医学中心肺癌微观模拟模型。
Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S85-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01752.x.
3
Chapter 5: Actual and counterfactual smoking prevalence rates in the U.S. population via microsimulation.第五章:通过微观模拟研究美国人口的实际和假设吸烟率。
Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S51-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01775.x.
4
Chapter 12: Yale lung cancer model.第十二章:耶鲁肺癌模型。
Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32 Suppl 1(0 1):S151-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01754.x.
5
Chapter 11: Rice-MD Anderson lung cancer model.第十一章:水稻-安德森肺癌模型。
Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32 Suppl 1:S142-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01741.x.
6
Chapter 2: Birth-cohort-specific estimates of smoking behaviors for the U.S. population.第二章:美国人口特定出生队列的吸烟行为估计。
Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32 Suppl 1(0 1):S14-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01703.x.
7
Chapter 9: The MGH-HMS lung cancer policy model: tobacco control versus screening.第 9 章:麻省总医院-哈佛医学院肺癌政策模型:控烟与筛查。
Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S117-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01652.x.
8
Cigarette smoking among successive birth cohorts of men and women in the United States during 1900-80.1900年至1980年间美国连续出生队列中男性和女性的吸烟情况。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983 Sep;71(3):473-9.
9
Effects of the antismoking campaign: an update.反吸烟运动的效果:最新情况
Am J Public Health. 1989 Feb;79(2):144-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.2.144.
10
Flexible regression models with cubic splines.具有三次样条的灵活回归模型。
Stat Med. 1989 May;8(5):551-61. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780080504.