Department of Psychology, Roehampton University, London, UK.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012 Sep;21(3):232-45. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1364. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief screening instrument for assessing emotional and behavioural problems in children and adolescents. This study examined the factor structure and validity of the self-report original English version of the SDQ and four of its many translations (German, Cypriot Greek, Swedish, and Italian). A total of 2418 adolescents from five European countries (Germany, Cyprus, England, Sweden, Italy), ages 12 to 17 years, participated. The sample was drawn from general (school) populations. In addition to the SDQ, all participants completed the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS), a measure of anxiety symptoms. The internal consistency and validity of the SDQ total difficulties were good for most countries. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that both five- and three-factor models provided good fit for the whole sample; however, the three-factor model fit somewhat better than the five-factor model. The factor structure differed across countries, with the three-factor model showing better fit indices in Cyprus, whereas the five-factor model fitted better in Germany. Fit indices for the UK, Sweden, and Italy were poor for both models. When the reversed items were removed, the goodness-of-fit improved significantly for the total sample and in each country. It is therefore recommended that the reversed items be removed or re-worded in future studies.
长处和困难问卷(SDQ)是一种用于评估儿童和青少年情绪和行为问题的简短筛查工具。本研究考察了 SDQ 自评原始英文版本以及其四种翻译版本(德语、塞浦路斯希腊语、瑞典语和意大利语)的因子结构和有效性。共有来自五个欧洲国家(德国、塞浦路斯、英国、瑞典和意大利)的 2418 名 12 至 17 岁的青少年参与了研究。该样本来自普通(学校)人群。除了 SDQ,所有参与者还完成了斯宾塞儿童焦虑量表(SCAS),这是一种焦虑症状的衡量标准。对于大多数国家来说,SDQ 总困难的内部一致性和有效性都很好。验证性因子分析表明,五因素和三因素模型都为整个样本提供了良好的拟合;然而,三因素模型的拟合度略优于五因素模型。因子结构在不同国家有所不同,三因素模型在塞浦路斯的拟合度指标更好,而五因素模型在德国的拟合度更好。英国、瑞典和意大利的拟合度指标对于这两种模型都较差。当删除反向项目后,整个样本和每个国家的拟合度都显著提高。因此,建议在未来的研究中删除或重新措辞反向项目。