Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230-1439, USA.
Ann Behav Med. 2012 Dec;44(3):331-40. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9402-5.
Lung cancer patients and their spouses may engage in blame attributions regarding the cancer cause, which may adversely affect their psychological adjustment.
The aim of this study was to examine whether dyadic adjustment and network support moderate the association between blame and distress in couples affected by lung cancer.
Patients and their spouses completed questionnaires within 1 month of treatment initiation (baseline) and at 6-month follow-up.
Multilevel modeling of data from 158 couples revealed that, at baseline, dyadic adjustment moderated the association between blame and distress for patients but not spouses (p < 0.05). Controlling for baseline distress, baseline blame predicted later distress (p < 0.05) for both patients and spouses regardless of dyadic adjustment. Network support moderated this association at follow-up.
For patients experiencing low dyadic adjustment, blame was associated with increased distress. Not initially but later, network support may protect against low levels but not high levels of blame in patients and spouses.
肺癌患者及其配偶可能会对癌症的病因进行指责归因,这可能会对他们的心理适应产生不利影响。
本研究旨在探讨夫妻双方的适应情况和网络支持是否能调节肺癌患者夫妻之间的指责与痛苦之间的关系。
患者及其配偶在治疗开始后 1 个月(基线)和 6 个月随访时完成了问卷调查。
对 158 对夫妇的数据进行多层次建模的结果表明,在基线时,夫妻双方的适应情况调节了患者的指责与痛苦之间的关系,但对配偶没有影响(p<0.05)。无论夫妻适应情况如何,控制基线痛苦后,基线指责都预测了患者和配偶之后的痛苦(p<0.05)。网络支持在随访时调节了这种关系。
对于适应情况较差的患者来说,指责与痛苦的增加有关。并非一开始,而是在后续,网络支持可能会保护患者和配偶免受低水平的指责,但不能免受高水平的指责。