Language and Speech Laboratory, Universidad del País Vasco, 01006 Vitoria, Spain.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):1120-9. doi: 10.1121/1.4732062.
Speech produced in the presence of noise--Lombard speech--is more intelligible in noise than speech produced in quiet, but the origin of this advantage is poorly understood. Some of the benefit appears to arise from auditory factors such as energetic masking release, but a role for linguistic enhancements similar to those exhibited in clear speech is possible. The current study examined the effect of Lombard speech in noise and in quiet for Spanish learners of English. Non-native listeners showed a substantial benefit of Lombard speech in noise, although not quite as large as that displayed by native listeners tested on the same task in an earlier study [Lu and Cooke (2008), J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 3261-3275]. The difference between the two groups is unlikely to be due to energetic masking. However, Lombard speech was less intelligible in quiet for non-native listeners than normal speech. The relatively small difference in Lombard benefit in noise for native and non-native listeners, along with the absence of Lombard benefit in quiet, suggests that any contribution of linguistic enhancements in the Lombard benefit for natives is small.
在噪声环境下产生的言语——伦巴第言语——比在安静环境下产生的言语在噪声中更易理解,但这种优势的起源还不太清楚。部分益处似乎源于听觉因素,例如能量掩蔽释放,但清晰言语所表现出的语言增强作用也有可能存在。本研究考察了在噪声和安静环境下,西班牙语英语学习者的伦巴第言语效应。非母语听者在噪声中表现出了相当大的伦巴第言语优势,尽管不如在先前一项研究中对同一任务进行测试的母语听者那么大[Lu 和 Cooke(2008),J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124,3261-3275]。两组之间的差异不太可能归因于能量掩蔽。然而,非母语听者在安静环境下的伦巴第言语比正常言语的可理解度更低。母语和非母语听者在噪声中的伦巴第言语优势差异较小,以及在安静环境中缺乏伦巴第言语优势,表明在母语者的伦巴第言语优势中,语言增强的贡献很小。