Busso T, Häkkinen K, Pakarinen A, Carasso C, Lacour J R, Komi P V, Kauhanen H
Laboratoire de Physiologie-GIP Exercise, Université de Saint-Etienne, France.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1990;61(1-2):48-54. doi: 10.1007/BF00236693.
A systems model, providing an estimation of fatigue and fitness levels was applied to a 1-year training period of six elite weight-lifters. The model parameters were individually determined by fitting the predicted performance (calculated as the difference between fitness and fatigue) to the actual one. The purpose of this study was to validate the systems model by comparing the estimated levels of fatigue and fitness with biological parameters external to the model calculation. The predicted and the actual performances were significantly correlated in each subject. The calculated fitness and fatigue levels were related to serum testosterone concentration, testosterone: cortisol and testosterone: sex hormone binding globulin ratios. The best results were obtained by the comparison between fitness and testosterone levels, which varied in parallel in each subject. In two subjects this correlation was significant (r = 0.91, P less than 0.05, and r = 0.92, P less than 0.01). The fitness changes calculated in each subject between the 15th and the 51st weeks of training were significantly correlated with the changes in serum testosterone concentration measured in the same period (r = 0.99, P less than 0.001). For the whole group testosterone and fitness variations were also significantly intercorrelated (r = 0.73, P less than 0.001). Correlations, less homogeneous and less significant, were calculated also for other hormones and ratios. These results suggest that (1) the relationships between training and performance can be described by the systems model, (2) the estimated index of fitness has a physiological meaning. The fatigue index remains to be clarified.
一个用于估计疲劳和体能水平的系统模型被应用于六名精英举重运动员的为期一年的训练期。通过将预测表现(计算为体能与疲劳之间的差异)与实际表现进行拟合,分别确定了模型参数。本研究的目的是通过将估计的疲劳和体能水平与模型计算外部的生物学参数进行比较,来验证该系统模型。在每个受试者中,预测表现与实际表现显著相关。计算出的体能和疲劳水平与血清睾酮浓度、睾酮:皮质醇以及睾酮:性激素结合球蛋白比值相关。通过比较体能和睾酮水平获得了最佳结果,在每个受试者中它们呈平行变化。在两名受试者中,这种相关性显著(r = 0.91,P < 0.05,以及r = 0.92,P < 0.01)。在训练的第15周和第51周之间,每个受试者计算出的体能变化与同期测量的血清睾酮浓度变化显著相关(r = 0.99,P < 0.001)。对于整个组,睾酮和体能变化也显著相互关联(r = 0.73,P < 0.001)。还计算了其他激素和比值的相关性,其均匀性和显著性较低。这些结果表明:(1)训练与表现之间的关系可以用该系统模型来描述;(2)估计的体能指数具有生理学意义。疲劳指数仍有待阐明。