Research Institute of Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo 4-6-1, Komaba, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan.
J Hazard Mater. 2012 Oct 15;235-236:265-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.052. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
We found that several solid-state cuprous compounds, including cuprous oxide (Cu(2)O), sulfide (Cu(2)S), iodide (CuI), and chloride (CuCl), have highly efficient antiviral activities, whereas those of solid-state silver and cupric compounds are markedly lower. On a Cu(2)O-loaded glass substrate, for example, the infectious activity of bacteriophages was reduced by 5-orders of magnitude within 30 min and by 3-orders of magnitude within 1h for bacteria. In contrast, the infectious activities of both phages and bacteria were not markedly reduced on CuO-loaded substrates within a similar time frame. To determine the origin of this inhibitory activity, we investigated the effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leached copper ions, and the solid-state compound itself against bacteriophages, and concluded that infectious activity is lost following direct contact with the solid-state surface of cuprous compounds, but not ROS or copper ions. Furthermore, we found that Cu(2)O adsorbed and denatured more proteins than CuO, which suggests the difference of the inhibitory activity between Cu(2)O and CuO.
我们发现,几种固态亚铜化合物,包括氧化亚铜(Cu(2)O)、硫化亚铜(Cu(2)S)、碘化亚铜(CuI)和氯化亚铜(CuCl),具有高效的抗病毒活性,而固态银和铜化合物的活性则明显较低。例如,在负载氧化亚铜的玻璃基板上,噬菌体的感染活性在 30 分钟内降低了 5 个数量级,在 1 小时内降低了 3 个数量级。相比之下,在类似的时间内,负载氧化铜的基板上噬菌体和细菌的感染活性并没有明显降低。为了确定这种抑制活性的来源,我们研究了活性氧(ROS)、浸出的铜离子以及固态化合物本身对噬菌体的影响,得出的结论是,感染活性在与亚铜化合物的固态表面直接接触后丧失,但不是 ROS 或铜离子。此外,我们发现 Cu(2)O 吸附和变性的蛋白质比 CuO 多,这表明 Cu(2)O 和 CuO 之间抑制活性的差异。