Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Front Syst Neurosci. 2012 Aug 14;6:60. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00060. eCollection 2012.
Several studies conducted during the past decade have suggested that episodic memory is better equipped to handle the future than the past. Here, we consider this premise in the context of motor memory. State-of-the-art computational models for trial-by-trial motor adaptation to constant and stochastic force field perturbations in a horizontal reaching paradigm have shown that motor memory registers a weighted sum of past experiences to predict force perturbation in a subsequent trial. In the current study, we used the standard horizontal reaching movement paradigm and a novel vertical reaching movement paradigm to test motor memory function during adaptation to force fields increasing in magnitude in a simple predictable linear series. We found that adaptation to constant and sequence force fields are similar in vertical and horizontal reaching. For both horizontal and vertical reaching, we found that the expectation in a particular trial was the average of the previous few trials rather than an expectation of a larger perturbation, as would be expected from a simple extrapolation. These findings are not consistent with those of our previous studies on lifting and grasping tasks, in which we found that the grip force is correctly adjusted to the next weight in a series of tasks with gradually increasing weights, thus predicting the future rather than averaging the past. The results of the current study devoted to reaching movements and of our previous study addressing a lifting task suggest that the brain can generate at least two different types of motor representation, either addressing the past in reaching or predicting the future in lifting. We propose that prior experience and the effect of environment's variability are the reasons for the observed differences in expectation during lifting and reaching. Finally, we discuss these two types of memory mechanisms with respect to the distinct neural circuits responsible for lifting and reaching.
过去十年中的几项研究表明,情景记忆在处理未来方面比处理过去更有优势。在这里,我们在运动记忆的背景下考虑这一前提。在水平伸展范式中针对恒定和随机力场干扰的逐次试验运动适应的最先进计算模型表明,运动记忆会对过去的经验进行加权求和,以预测随后试验中的力场干扰。在当前的研究中,我们使用标准的水平伸展运动范式和新颖的垂直伸展运动范式,在力场逐渐增大的简单可预测线性系列中测试运动记忆功能在适应力场时的作用。我们发现,在垂直和水平伸展中,对恒定力场和序列力场的适应是相似的。对于水平和垂直伸展,我们发现特定试验中的预期是前几个试验的平均值,而不是像简单外推那样预期更大的干扰。这些发现与我们之前关于提升和抓取任务的研究结果不一致,在这些研究中,我们发现握力在一系列逐渐增加重量的任务中会正确地调整到下一个重量,从而预测未来,而不是平均过去。当前关于伸展运动的研究结果和我们之前关于提升任务的研究结果表明,大脑至少可以产生两种不同类型的运动表现,要么是在伸展中处理过去,要么是在提升中预测未来。我们提出,先前的经验和环境变化的影响是在提升和伸展中观察到的预期差异的原因。最后,我们根据负责提升和伸展的不同神经回路讨论这两种记忆机制。