• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Perceptions and Attitudes of First-Year Medical Students on a Modified Team-Based Learning (TBL) Strategy in Anatomy.一年级医学生对解剖学中改良的基于团队学习(TBL)策略的认知与态度
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2012 Aug;12(3):336-43. doi: 10.12816/0003148. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
2
Team-based learning replaces problem-based learning at a large medical school.以团队为基础的学习取代了一所大型医学院的以问题为基础的学习。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02362-4.
3
Five heads are better than one: preliminary results of team-based learning in a communication disorders graduate course.三个臭皮匠,赛过诸葛亮:沟通障碍研究生课程中基于团队学习的初步结果。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Jan;51(1):44-60. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12184. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
4
Assessment of first-year medical students' perceptions of teaching and learning through team-based learning sessions.评估医学生通过团队学习课程对教学的看法。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2016 Dec;40(4):536-542. doi: 10.1152/advan.00001.2016.
5
Team-based learning-adopted strategy in pharmacy education: pharmacology and medicinal chemistry students' perceptions.药学教育中采用的基于团队的学习策略:药理学和药物化学专业学生的看法
Futur J Pharm Sci. 2023;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s43094-023-00464-6. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
6
A survey of student perceptions of team-based learning in anatomy curriculum: favorable views unrelated to grades.一项关于解剖学课程中基于团队学习的学生认知的调查:与成绩无关的积极看法。
Anat Sci Educ. 2009 Jul-Aug;2(4):150-5. doi: 10.1002/ase.91.
7
Express Team-Based Learning (eTBL): A Time-Efficient TBL Approach in Neuroradiology.表达型团队学习(eTBL):神经放射学中的一种高效 TBL 方法。
Acad Radiol. 2020 Feb;27(2):284-290. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
8
Team-based learning as a teaching strategy for first-year medical students.基于团队的学习作为一年级医学生的一种教学策略。
Australas Med J. 2014 Dec 31;7(12):490-9. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2014.2244. eCollection 2014.
9
Using team-based learning in an endocrine module taught across two campuses.在两个校区授课的内分泌学模块中采用基于团队的学习方法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Oct 15;72(5):103. doi: 10.5688/aj7205103.
10
Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork.在大体解剖实验室中基于团队的学习可提高学业成绩以及学生对团队合作的态度。
Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):95-103. doi: 10.1002/ase.1460. Epub 2014 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and psychometric testing of an instrument for team-based learning assessment.基于团队学习评估工具的开发与心理测量测试
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Sep 28;13:348. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1064_23. eCollection 2024.
2
Implementation of Team-Based Learning for a Clinical Module of the Ethiopian Undergraduate Anesthesia Curriculum and Students' Perspectives: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study.埃塞俄比亚本科麻醉课程临床模块的基于团队学习的实施及学生观点:一项试点横断面研究
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Dec 15;14:1413-1424. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S437710. eCollection 2023.
3
Student Engagement Using HoloLens Mixed-Reality Technology in Human Anatomy Laboratories for Osteopathic Medical Students: an Instructional Model.在整骨医学学生的人体解剖实验室中使用HoloLens混合现实技术促进学生参与:一种教学模式。
Med Sci Educ. 2023 Jan 19;33(1):223-231. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01728-9. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Application of team-based learning to ophthalmology in China.团队学习在我国眼科学中的应用。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;10:922325. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.922325. eCollection 2022.
5
The Effectiveness and Student Perceptions of Peer-Conducted Team-Based Learning Compared to Faculty-Led Teaching in Undergraduate Teaching.本科教学中同伴主导的基于团队的学习与教师主导教学相比的有效性及学生认知
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 May 18;13:535-542. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S358360. eCollection 2022.
6
The impact of asynchronous online anatomy teaching and smaller learning groups in the anatomy laboratory on medical students' performance during the Covid-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,解剖学异步在线教学以及解剖实验室中规模较小的学习小组对医学生成绩的影响。
Anat Sci Educ. 2022 May;15(3):476-492. doi: 10.1002/ase.2179. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
7
Comparison of Team-Based Learning Over Conventional Didactic Lecture Among Second-Year MBBS Students.本科医学专业二年级学生中基于团队的学习与传统讲授式教学的比较
Cureus. 2022 Jan 31;14(1):e21792. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21792. eCollection 2022 Jan.
8
Efficacy of Video-Based Forearm Anatomy Model Instruction for a Virtual Education Environment.基于视频的前臂解剖模型教学在虚拟教育环境中的效果
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Jan 8;9:23821205211063287. doi: 10.1177/23821205211063287. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
Student Learning of Radiological Anatomy Through Team-Based Learning Modules: Early Successes and Qualitative Analysis.通过基于团队的学习模块进行放射解剖学的学生学习:早期成果与定性分析
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Oct 15;29(4):1233-1238. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00835-w. eCollection 2019 Dec.
10
Team-based learning versus Traditional lecture-based learning: An investigation of students' perceptions and academic achievements.基于团队的学习与传统的基于讲座的学习:对学生认知和学业成绩的调查。
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Jul-Aug;37(4):1080-1085. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.4.4000.

本文引用的文献

1
Vertical integration in medical school: effect on the transition to postgraduate training.医学院校的垂直整合:对研究生培训过渡的影响。
Med Educ. 2010 Mar;44(3):272-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03571.x.
2
Medical students' attitudes about team-based learning in a pre-clinical curriculum.医学生对基础医学课程中团队学习的态度。
Med Educ Online. 2009 Jan 7;14:1. doi: 10.3885/meo.2009.Res00280.
3
Gender differences in learning style preferences among undergraduate physiology students.本科生理学专业学生学习风格偏好的性别差异。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2007 Jun;31(2):153-7. doi: 10.1152/advan.00060.2006.
4
Impact of a new curriculum on medical students' interpersonal and interviewing skills.新课程对医学生人际沟通与问诊技巧的影响。
Med Educ. 2007 Feb;41(2):154-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02680.x.
5
Where's the evidence that active learning works?主动学习有效的证据在哪里?
Adv Physiol Educ. 2006 Dec;30(4):159-67. doi: 10.1152/advan.00053.2006.
6
Active learning in a Year 2 pathology curriculum.二年级病理学课程中的主动学习
Med Educ. 2005 Oct;39(10):1045-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02248.x.
7
Adaption of team learning to an introductory graduate pharmacology course.
Teach Learn Med. 2005 Winter;17(1):56-62; discussion 85-8. doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1701_10.
8
Team-based learning in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course.医学大体解剖学与胚胎学课程中的基于团队的学习
Clin Anat. 2005 Jan;18(1):56-63. doi: 10.1002/ca.20040.
9
Transforming a clinical clerkship with team learning.通过团队学习转变临床实习
Teach Learn Med. 2004 Summer;16(3):270-5. doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1603_9.
10
The effect of using team learning in an evidence-based medicine course for medical students.在面向医学生的循证医学课程中采用小组学习的效果。
Teach Learn Med. 2003 Spring;15(2):131-9. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1502_11.

一年级医学生对解剖学中改良的基于团队学习(TBL)策略的认知与态度

Perceptions and Attitudes of First-Year Medical Students on a Modified Team-Based Learning (TBL) Strategy in Anatomy.

作者信息

Inuwa Ibrahim M

机构信息

Department of Human & Clinical Anatomy, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.

出版信息

Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2012 Aug;12(3):336-43. doi: 10.12816/0003148. Epub 2012 Jul 15.

DOI:10.12816/0003148
PMID:22912927
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3413625/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although team-based learning (TBL) is widely used in medical education, its evaluation from the perspectives of the students exposed to it has been limited. This paper reports on a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of perceptions of first year medical students towards TBL.

METHODS

Lectures in an anatomy course were transformed into a series of TBL sessions for two cohorts of first-year medical students. Each session consisted of pre-class reading, in-class readiness assurance tests, and problem-solving of clinical cases by student teams. At the end of each course, students were surveyed using qualitative and quantitative instruments to assess their perceptions of the strategy. Internal consistency of questionnaire items was determined by a reliability analysis (Cronbach's alpha). Principal component factor analysis and correspondence analysis were conducted on the quantitative data. Open-ended questions were explored by thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Students' evaluations indicated that TBL is a welcome alternative to lecture-based teaching; as implemented in this study, it encouraged clinical problem solving and fruitful in-class discussion. Principal component factor analysis identified five factors (Cronbach's alpha 0.602-0.875). However, the majority of students disapproved of mixed gender TBL teams. Most students agreed that the strategy facilitated consistency in their study, generated an increased awareness about self-directed learning, and had a positive impact on their learning attitudes.

CONCLUSION

TBL is a welcome instructional strategy as reported by our first-year medical students. It was perceived to be a better approach compared to content-based lectures. The effect on actual student performance is currently being investigated.

摘要

目的

尽管基于团队的学习(TBL)在医学教育中被广泛应用,但其从参与学生的角度进行的评估却很有限。本文报告了对一年级医学生对TBL看法的定量和定性评估。

方法

解剖学课程的讲座被转化为针对两个一年级医学生群体的一系列TBL课程。每个课程包括课前阅读、课堂准备度保证测试以及学生团队对临床病例的问题解决。在每门课程结束时,使用定性和定量工具对学生进行调查,以评估他们对该教学策略的看法。通过可靠性分析(克朗巴哈系数)确定问卷项目的内部一致性。对定量数据进行主成分因子分析和对应分析。通过主题分析探讨开放式问题。

结果

学生评估表明,TBL是基于讲座教学的受欢迎替代方式;在本研究中实施时,它鼓励临床问题解决并促进了富有成效的课堂讨论。主成分因子分析确定了五个因子(克朗巴哈系数0.602 - 0.875)。然而,大多数学生不赞成男女混合的TBL团队。大多数学生同意该策略促进了他们学习的一致性,提高了对自主学习的认识,并对他们的学习态度产生了积极影响。

结论

正如我们的一年级医学生所报告的,TBL是一种受欢迎的教学策略。与基于内容的讲座相比,它被认为是一种更好的方法。目前正在研究其对学生实际表现的影响。