Inuwa Ibrahim M
Department of Human & Clinical Anatomy, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2012 Aug;12(3):336-43. doi: 10.12816/0003148. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
Although team-based learning (TBL) is widely used in medical education, its evaluation from the perspectives of the students exposed to it has been limited. This paper reports on a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of perceptions of first year medical students towards TBL.
Lectures in an anatomy course were transformed into a series of TBL sessions for two cohorts of first-year medical students. Each session consisted of pre-class reading, in-class readiness assurance tests, and problem-solving of clinical cases by student teams. At the end of each course, students were surveyed using qualitative and quantitative instruments to assess their perceptions of the strategy. Internal consistency of questionnaire items was determined by a reliability analysis (Cronbach's alpha). Principal component factor analysis and correspondence analysis were conducted on the quantitative data. Open-ended questions were explored by thematic analysis.
Students' evaluations indicated that TBL is a welcome alternative to lecture-based teaching; as implemented in this study, it encouraged clinical problem solving and fruitful in-class discussion. Principal component factor analysis identified five factors (Cronbach's alpha 0.602-0.875). However, the majority of students disapproved of mixed gender TBL teams. Most students agreed that the strategy facilitated consistency in their study, generated an increased awareness about self-directed learning, and had a positive impact on their learning attitudes.
TBL is a welcome instructional strategy as reported by our first-year medical students. It was perceived to be a better approach compared to content-based lectures. The effect on actual student performance is currently being investigated.
尽管基于团队的学习(TBL)在医学教育中被广泛应用,但其从参与学生的角度进行的评估却很有限。本文报告了对一年级医学生对TBL看法的定量和定性评估。
解剖学课程的讲座被转化为针对两个一年级医学生群体的一系列TBL课程。每个课程包括课前阅读、课堂准备度保证测试以及学生团队对临床病例的问题解决。在每门课程结束时,使用定性和定量工具对学生进行调查,以评估他们对该教学策略的看法。通过可靠性分析(克朗巴哈系数)确定问卷项目的内部一致性。对定量数据进行主成分因子分析和对应分析。通过主题分析探讨开放式问题。
学生评估表明,TBL是基于讲座教学的受欢迎替代方式;在本研究中实施时,它鼓励临床问题解决并促进了富有成效的课堂讨论。主成分因子分析确定了五个因子(克朗巴哈系数0.602 - 0.875)。然而,大多数学生不赞成男女混合的TBL团队。大多数学生同意该策略促进了他们学习的一致性,提高了对自主学习的认识,并对他们的学习态度产生了积极影响。
正如我们的一年级医学生所报告的,TBL是一种受欢迎的教学策略。与基于内容的讲座相比,它被认为是一种更好的方法。目前正在研究其对学生实际表现的影响。