Suppr超能文献

四种头孢菌素对大肠杆菌体内外作用的比较研究

Comparative study of the effects of four cephalosporins against Escherichia coli in vitro and in vivo.

作者信息

van Ogtrop M L, Mattie H, Guiot H F, van Strijen E, Hazekamp-van Dokkum A M, van Furth R

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Oct;34(10):1932-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.10.1932.

Abstract

A thigh muscle infection induced with Escherichia coli in irradiated mice was used as a model to compare the in vivo pharmacodynamics of the antibacterial effect of four cephalosporins (i.e., cefepime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, and cefoperazone) with the in vitro antibacterial pharmacodynamics of these drugs. The following in vitro pharmacodynamic parameters were determined: the maximum effect as a measure for efficacy, the 50% effective concentration as a parameter for potency, and the slope of the concentration-effect relationship. For analysis of the in vivo antibacterial pharmacodynamics, the same parameters were applied for the dose instead of the concentration. For the detection of a relationship between concentration and antibacterial effect in vivo, we determined the pharmacokinetics of the four cephalosporins in the plasma of mice. The results showed that, in general, there is a direct relationship between the in vivo and in vitro pharmacodynamics of these cephalosporins. The maximum effects of cefepime, ceftazidime, and cefoperazone were approximately similar in vivo and in vitro. The sequence of potency of these drugs was, in descending order, cefepime, ceftazidime, and cefoperazone. Ceftriaxone differed from the other three cephalosporins in that it displayed unexpected in vivo pharmacodynamics. Ceftriaxone was just as efficacious as the other three in vitro, but its maximum effect in vivo was much lower. This relatively low maximum effect of ceftriaxone in vivo was not explained by the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the drug. From the present results it can be concluded that the in vitro efficacy of cephalosporins does not necessarily have a predictive value for the in vivo efficacy.

摘要

以受辐照小鼠中由大肠杆菌诱导的大腿肌肉感染作为模型,比较四种头孢菌素(即头孢吡肟、头孢曲松、头孢他啶和头孢哌酮)抗菌作用的体内药效学与这些药物的体外抗菌药效学。测定了以下体外药效学参数:作为疗效指标的最大效应、作为效价参数的50%有效浓度以及浓度-效应关系的斜率。为分析体内抗菌药效学,将相同参数应用于剂量而非浓度。为检测体内浓度与抗菌效果之间的关系,我们测定了四种头孢菌素在小鼠血浆中的药代动力学。结果表明,总体而言,这些头孢菌素的体内和体外药效学之间存在直接关系。头孢吡肟、头孢他啶和头孢哌酮的最大效应在体内和体外大致相似。这些药物的效价顺序从高到低依次为头孢吡肟、头孢他啶和头孢哌酮。头孢曲松与其他三种头孢菌素不同,其体内药效学表现出人意料。头孢曲松在体外与其他三种药物一样有效,但其体内最大效应要低得多。头孢曲松在体内相对较低的最大效应无法用该药物的药代动力学特征来解释。从目前的结果可以得出结论,头孢菌素的体外疗效不一定对体内疗效具有预测价值。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
The modelling of drug response.药物反应的建模
Clin Sci (Lond). 1980 Nov;59(5):311-5. doi: 10.1042/cs0590311.
8
Role of pharmacokinetics in the outcome of infections.药代动力学在感染结局中的作用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Mar;32(3):289-97. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.3.289.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验