Suppr超能文献

朝向阅读的通用模型。

Towards a universal model of reading.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91905, Israel.

出版信息

Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):263-79. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001841. Epub 2012 Aug 29.

Abstract

In the last decade, reading research has seen a paradigmatic shift. A new wave of computational models of orthographic processing that offer various forms of noisy position or context-sensitive coding have revolutionized the field of visual word recognition. The influx of such models stems mainly from consistent findings, coming mostly from European languages, regarding an apparent insensitivity of skilled readers to letter order. Underlying the current revolution is the theoretical assumption that the insensitivity of readers to letter order reflects the special way in which the human brain encodes the position of letters in printed words. The present article discusses the theoretical shortcomings and misconceptions of this approach to visual word recognition. A systematic review of data obtained from a variety of languages demonstrates that letter-order insensitivity is neither a general property of the cognitive system nor a property of the brain in encoding letters. Rather, it is a variant and idiosyncratic characteristic of some languages, mostly European, reflecting a strategy of optimizing encoding resources, given the specific structure of words. Since the main goal of reading research is to develop theories that describe the fundamental and invariant phenomena of reading across orthographies, an alternative approach to model visual word recognition is offered. The dimensions of a possible universal model of reading, which outlines the common cognitive operations involved in orthographic processing in all writing systems, are discussed.

摘要

在过去的十年中,阅读研究发生了范式转变。一波新的、具有各种形式噪声位置或上下文敏感编码的正字法处理计算模型彻底改变了视觉单词识别领域。这些模型的涌入主要源于一致的发现,这些发现主要来自欧洲语言,表明熟练读者对字母顺序的明显不敏感。当前这场革命的理论假设是,读者对字母顺序的不敏感反映了人类大脑以特殊方式对印刷单词中字母位置进行编码。本文讨论了这种视觉单词识别方法的理论缺陷和误解。对从各种语言中获得的数据进行系统回顾表明,对字母顺序不敏感既不是认知系统的一般属性,也不是大脑对字母进行编码的属性。相反,它是一些语言(主要是欧洲语言)的变体和特质,反映了在给定单词特定结构的情况下优化编码资源的策略。由于阅读研究的主要目标是开发描述跨正字法阅读基本不变现象的理论,因此提供了一种替代方法来模拟视觉单词识别。讨论了可能的阅读通用模型的维度,该模型概述了所有书写系统中涉及正字法处理的共同认知操作。

相似文献

1
Towards a universal model of reading.
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):263-79. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001841. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
3
The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Feb;18(2):90-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
4
Orthographic processing is universal; it's what you do with it that's different.
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):296-7. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000106. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
5
Does a focus on universals represent a new trend in word recognition?
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):285. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000295. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
6
Position-invariant letter identification is a key component of any universal model of reading.
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):281-2. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000027. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
7
Skilled readers show different serial-position effects for letter versus non-letter target detection in mixed-material strings.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Mar;204:103025. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103025. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
8
Perceptual uncertainty is a property of the cognitive system.
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):298-9. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000118. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
9
Orthographic processing: A 'mid-level' vision of reading: The 44th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Feb;71(2):335-359. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
10
Semantic predictability eliminates the transposed-letter effect.
Mem Cognit. 2012 May;40(4):628-41. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0170-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Morphology in children's books, and what it means for learning.
NPJ Sci Learn. 2025 May 5;10(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s41539-025-00313-6.
2
Open-bigrams as orthographic processing units in Arabic: Evidence from the flanking-letters lexical-decision task.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May;87(4):1307-1318. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03061-2. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
3
The Eye Movement Database of Passage Reading in Vertically Written Traditional Mongolian.
Sci Data. 2025 Mar 25;12(1):499. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-04771-w.
4
Jiwar: A database and calculator for word neighborhood measures in 40 languages.
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Feb 19;57(3):98. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02612-7.
6
Visual attention matters during word recognition: A Bayesian modeling approach.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):1165-1203. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02591-4. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
7
Are the early stages of orthographic processing universal? Insights from masked priming with Semitic words.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):770-778. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02563-8. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
8
HeLP: The Hebrew Lexicon project.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8761-8783. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02502-4. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
9
Letters, Words, Sentences, and Reading.
J Cogn. 2024 Aug 27;7(1):66. doi: 10.5334/joc.396. eCollection 2024.
10
Memory representations are flexibly adapted to orthographic systems: A comparison of English and Hebrew.
Brain Res. 2024 Dec 1;1844:149127. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149127. Epub 2024 Jul 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence for and characteristics of Dyslexia among Japanese children.
Ann Dyslexia. 1994 Jan;44(1):103-19. doi: 10.1007/BF02648157.
2
Connectionism and the Role of Morphology in Visual Word Recognition.
Ment Lex. 2010 Jan 1;5(3):371-400. doi: 10.1075/ml.5.3.07rue.
3
Letter position dyslexia in Arabic: from form to position.
Behav Neurol. 2012;25(3):193-203. doi: 10.3233/BEN-2012-119004.
4
A dual-route approach to orthographic processing.
Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 13;2:54. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054. eCollection 2011.
5
Subsyllabic structure reflected in letter confusability effects in Korean word recognition.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Feb;18(1):129-34. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0028-y.
6
Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1;108(9):3526-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012551108. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
7
Words with and without internal structure: what determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing?
Cognition. 2011 Feb;118(2):141-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.013. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
8
Induced letter migrations between words and what they reveal about the orthographic-visual analyzer.
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Feb;49(3):339-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.026. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
9
Letters in words are read simultaneously, not in left-to-right sequence.
Psychol Sci. 2010 Dec;21(12):1799-801. doi: 10.1177/0956797610387442. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
10
Letter position dyslexia.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2001 Dec 1;18(8):673-96. doi: 10.1080/02643290143000051.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验