Pattani Varun P, Tunnell James W
Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, 107 W Dean Keeton, C0800 Austin, Texas 78712, USA.
Lasers Surg Med. 2012 Oct;44(8):675-84. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22072. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
Near-infrared (NIR) absorbing plasmonic nanoparticles enhance photothermal therapy of tumors. In this procedure, systemically delivered gold nanoparticles preferentially accumulate at the tumor site and when irradiated using laser light, produce localized heat sufficient to damage tumor cells. Gold nanoshells and nanorods have been widely studied for this purpose, and while both exhibit strong NIR absorption, their overall absorption and scattering properties differ widely due to their geometry. In this paper, we compared the photothermal response of both nanoparticle types including the heat generation and photothermal efficiency.
Tissue simulating phantoms, with varying concentrations of gold nanoparticles, were irradiated with a near-infrared diode laser while concurrently monitoring the surface temperature with an infrared camera. We calculated nanoshell and nanorod optical properties using the Mie solution and the discrete dipole approximation, respectively. In addition, we measured the heat generation of nanoshells and nanorods at the same optical density to determine the photothermal transduction efficiency for both nanoparticle types.
We found that the gold nanoshells produced more heat than gold nanorods at equivalent number densities (# of nanoparticles/ml), whereas the nanorods generated more heat than nanoshells at equivalent extinction values at the irradiance wavelength. To reach an equivalent heat generation, we found that it was necessary to have ∼36× more nanorods than nanoshells. However, the gold nanorods were found to have two times the photothermal transduction efficiency than the gold nanoshells.
For the nanoparticles tested, the nanoshells generated more heat, per nanoparticle, than nanorods, primarily due to their overall larger geometric cross-section. Conversely, we found that the gold nanorods had a higher photothermal efficiency than the gold nanoshells. In conclusion, the ideal choice of plasmonic nanoparticle requires not only per particle efficiency, but also the in vivo particle targeting ability under study.
近红外(NIR)吸收性等离子体纳米颗粒可增强肿瘤的光热治疗。在此过程中,经全身递送的金纳米颗粒优先在肿瘤部位聚集,当用激光照射时,会产生足以损伤肿瘤细胞的局部热量。金纳米壳和纳米棒已为此目的得到广泛研究,虽然两者都表现出强烈的近红外吸收,但由于其几何形状,它们的整体吸收和散射特性差异很大。在本文中,我们比较了两种纳米颗粒类型的光热响应,包括发热情况和光热效率。
用近红外二极管激光照射含有不同浓度金纳米颗粒的组织模拟体模,同时用红外热像仪监测表面温度。我们分别使用米氏解和离散偶极近似计算纳米壳和纳米棒的光学特性。此外,我们在相同光密度下测量了纳米壳和纳米棒的发热情况,以确定两种纳米颗粒类型的光热转换效率。
我们发现,在等效数量密度(每毫升纳米颗粒数量)下,金纳米壳产生的热量比金纳米棒多,而在辐照波长处的等效消光值下,纳米棒产生的热量比纳米壳多。为了达到等效发热,我们发现纳米棒的数量需要比纳米壳多约36倍。然而,发现金纳米棒的光热转换效率是金纳米壳的两倍。
对于所测试的纳米颗粒,每个纳米颗粒而言,纳米壳产生的热量比纳米棒多,这主要是由于其整体较大的几何横截面。相反,我们发现金纳米棒的光热效率比金纳米壳高。总之,等离子体纳米颗粒的理想选择不仅需要考虑每个颗粒的效率,还需要考虑所研究的体内颗粒靶向能力。