Suppr超能文献

2010 年和 2011 年美国临床肿瘤学会年会上医生对推特的使用趋势。

Trends in twitter use by physicians at the american society of clinical oncology annual meeting, 2010 and 2011.

机构信息

JuvoLab, Long Island City, NY; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora CO; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Lutherville, MD.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2012 May;8(3):173-8. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000483. Epub 2012 Apr 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Social media channels such as Twitter are gaining increasing acceptance as mechanisms for instantaneous scientific dialogue. Professional medical societies such as ASCO are using social media to expand the reach of scientific communications at and around their scientific meetings. This article examines the how Twitter use by oncologists expanded at the ASCO Annual Meetings from 2010 to 2011.

METHODS

In both years, tweets that were specifically generated by physicians and that incorporated the official meeting hashtag were harvested from the public domain, and a discourse analysis was performed by three independent raters. Follow-up surveys were conducted to assess physician attitudes toward Twitter and its potential role in clinical practice.

RESULTS

A combined total of 12,644 tweets were analyzed for 2010 and 2011. Although the number of physicians authoring tweets was small (14 in 2010, 34 in 2011), this group generated nearly 29% of the total meeting dialogue examined in this analysis in 2010 and 23% in 2011. Physicians used Twitter for reporting clinical news from scientific sessions, for discussions of treatment issues, for promotion, and to provide social commentary. The tangible impact of Twitter discussions on clinical practice remains unclear.

CONCLUSION

Despite the 140-character limit, Twitter was successfully used by physicians at the 2010 and 2011 ASCO Annual Meetings to engage in clinical discussions, whether or not an author was on site as a live attendee. Twitter usage grew significantly from 2010 to 2011. Professional societies should monitor these phenomena to enhance annual meeting attendee user experience.

摘要

目的

社交媒体渠道(如 Twitter)作为即时科学对话的机制越来越受到认可。专业医学协会(如 ASCO)正在利用社交媒体扩大其科学会议期间和周边的科学传播范围。本文研究了 2010 年至 2011 年期间,肿瘤学家在 ASCO 年会上使用 Twitter 的情况。

方法

在这两年中,从公共领域中收集了由医生专门生成并包含会议官方标签的推文,并由三位独立的评分员进行了话语分析。还进行了后续调查,以评估医生对 Twitter 的态度及其在临床实践中的潜在作用。

结果

对 2010 年和 2011 年共 12644 条推文进行了分析。尽管撰写推文的医生人数较少(2010 年 14 人,2011 年 34 人),但该群体在 2010 年的分析中生成了近 29%的会议总对话,在 2011 年生成了 23%的对话。医生使用 Twitter 报告科学会议的临床新闻,讨论治疗问题,进行推广并提供社会评论。Twitter 讨论对临床实践的实际影响尚不清楚。

结论

尽管受到 140 个字符的限制,但在 2010 年和 2011 年 ASCO 年会上,医生成功地使用 Twitter 进行临床讨论,无论作者是否作为现场与会者参会。从 2010 年到 2011 年,Twitter 的使用量显著增长。专业协会应监测这些现象,以增强年度会议与会者的用户体验。

相似文献

1
Trends in twitter use by physicians at the american society of clinical oncology annual meeting, 2010 and 2011.
J Oncol Pract. 2012 May;8(3):173-8. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000483. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
3
Tweeting the Meeting: Twitter Use at The American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting 2013-2016.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3418-22. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5406-x. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
6
What's trending? Reach and content of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine on social media.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Nov;5(11):101159. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101159. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
8
#CGS2015: An Evaluation of Twitter Use at the Canadian Geriatrics Society Annual Scientific Meeting.
Can Geriatr J. 2018 Jun 30;21(2):166-172. doi: 10.5770/cgj.21.302. eCollection 2018 Jun.
9
Social media in radiology: early trends in Twitter microblogging at radiology's largest international meeting.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Apr;11(4):387-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.07.015. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

2
Oncofertility and Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients Across the Twitterverse.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 29;13:926668. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.926668. eCollection 2022.
3
Netiquette for social media engagement for oncology professionals.
Future Oncol. 2022 Mar;18(9):1133-1141. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-1366. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
4
Women Oncologists' Perceptions and Factors Associated With Decisions to Pursue Academic vs Nonacademic Careers in Oncology.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2141344. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.41344.
5
Correlation between Twitter mentions and academic citations in sexual medicine journals.
Int J Impot Res. 2022 Sep;34(6):593-598. doi: 10.1038/s41443-021-00457-0. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
7
Tweeting from the Bench: Twitter and the Physician-Scientist Benefits and Challenges.
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2020 Dec;15(6):419-423. doi: 10.1007/s11899-020-00601-5. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
8
Social Media Engagement at Academic Conferences: Report of the Association of Pathology Chairs 2018 and 2019 Annual Meeting Social Media Committee.
Acad Pathol. 2020 Jul 17;7:2374289520934019. doi: 10.1177/2374289520934019. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
9
Mining Physicians' Opinions on Social Media to Obtain Insights Into COVID-19: Mixed Methods Analysis.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Jun 18;6(2):e19276. doi: 10.2196/19276.
10
Examining Public Communication About Kidney Cancer on Twitter.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2019 Mar;3:1-6. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00088.

本文引用的文献

1
Tweet me.
Nat Methods. 2011 Apr;8(4):273. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0411-273.
2
Professionalism in the digital age.
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Apr 19;154(8):560-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-8-201104190-00008.
3
Physicians on Twitter.
JAMA. 2011 Feb 9;305(6):566-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.68.
4
Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak.
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 29;5(11):e14118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014118.
5
Social media policies at US medical schools.
Med Educ Online. 2010 Sep 15;15. doi: 10.3402/meo.v15i0.5324.
6
The role of social networking applications in the medical academic environment.
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2010 Summer;48(3):61-82. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e3181e6e7d8.
7
Dissemination of health information through social networks: twitter and antibiotics.
Am J Infect Control. 2010 Apr;38(3):182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.11.004.
8
Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness.
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Aug 25;10(3):e22. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1030.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验