Suppr超能文献

当前时代非工作时间经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的死亡率结果。

Mortality outcome of out-of-hours primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the current era.

机构信息

Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE7 7DN, UK.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2012 Dec;33(24):3046-53. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs261. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

Abstract

AIMS

To assess the impact of the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) on in-hospital and long-term all-cause mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study retrospectively analyses the prospectively collected data on 2571 consecutive PPCI-treated STEMI patients between March 2008 and June 2011. Of these, 1036 patients (40.3%) underwent PPCI during a weekday between 08:00 and 18:00 (routine-hours group) and 1535 patients (59.7%) underwent PPCI on a weekday between 18:00 and 08:00 or a weekend (out-of-hours group). Compared with the routine-hours group, the out-of-hours group had a lower mean age, fewer patients with previous angina, longer call-to-hospital time, and fewer multivessel PCI. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 4.5% with no significant difference [0.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.4 to 1.9%] between the routine-hours group (4.3%) and the out-of-hours group (4.6%) (adjusted odds ratio: 1.33, 95% CI: 0.73-2.40, P = 0.35). During a mean follow-up period of 560 days, 295 patients (11.5%) died, 12.2% in the routine-hours group and 11.0% in the out-of-hours group (difference of -0.1%, 95% CI: -0.4 to 0.2%). In the multiple Cox proportional hazards model, there was no difference in mortality between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.82-1.46, P = 0.57). Similarly, no increase in mortality was seen in patients who underwent PPCI later at night (22:00-06:00).

CONCLUSION

This study of real-world, unselected STEMI patients demonstrates that in a large, well-staffed centre, PPCI outside routine-working hours is safe with no difference in outcome of in-hospital and long-term mortality compared with PPCI during routine-working hours.

摘要

目的

评估直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的时间对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者住院期间和长期全因死亡率的影响。

方法和结果

本研究回顾性分析了 2008 年 3 月至 2011 年 6 月期间连续 2571 例接受 PPCI 治疗的 STEMI 患者前瞻性收集的数据。其中,1036 例(40.3%)患者在 08:00 至 18:00(常规时段)之间的工作日进行 PPCI(常规时段组),1535 例(59.7%)患者在工作日 18:00 至 08:00 或周末(非工作时段组)进行 PPCI。与常规时段组相比,非工作时段组患者年龄更小,既往心绞痛患者更少,呼叫至医院时间更长,多血管 PCI 更少。住院期间总体死亡率为 4.5%,常规时段组(4.3%)和非工作时段组(4.6%)之间无显著差异[0.2%,95%置信区间(CI):-1.4 至 1.9%](校正优势比:1.33,95%CI:0.73-2.40,P=0.35)。在平均 560 天的随访期间,有 295 例(11.5%)患者死亡,常规时段组为 12.2%,非工作时段组为 11.0%(差异为-0.1%,95%CI:-0.4 至 0.2%)。在多 Cox 比例风险模型中,两组死亡率无差异(校正风险比:1.09,95%CI:0.82-1.46,P=0.57)。同样,在夜间较晚时间(22:00-06:00)进行 PPCI 的患者死亡率也没有增加。

结论

这项针对真实世界、未经选择的 STEMI 患者的研究表明,在一个人员配备充足的大型中心,非工作时段进行 PPCI 是安全的,与工作时段进行 PPCI 相比,住院期间和长期死亡率的结果没有差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验