• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
From 'implications' to 'dimensions': science, medicine and ethics in society.从“影响”到“维度”:社会中的科学、医学和伦理学。
Health Care Anal. 2013 Mar;21(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0219-y.
2
How can we help? From "sociology in" to "sociology of" bioethics.我们能如何提供帮助?从生物伦理学的“社会学介入”到“社会学视角”。
J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Summer;32(2):279-92, 191. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00475.x.
3
Beyond medical ethics: new directions for philosophy and medicine.超越医学伦理:哲学与医学的新方向
J Med Humanit Bioeth. 1988 Fall-Winter;9(2):121-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01139237.
4
The 'Magic Light': A Discussion on Laser Ethics.“神奇之光”:关于激光伦理的讨论
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):979-98. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9566-4. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
5
How sociology can save bioethics . . . maybe.社会学如何拯救生物伦理学……也许吧。
Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Nov;26(7):875-96. doi: 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00421.x.
6
Ethics in technological culture: a programmatic proposal for a pragmatist approach.技术文化中的伦理:一种实用主义方法的纲领性提议。
Sci Technol Human Values. 2004 Winter;29(1):3-29. doi: 10.1177/0162243903259188.
7
Research, engagement and public bioethics: promoting socially robust science.研究、参与和公共生物伦理学:促进具有社会韧性的科学。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Nov;37(11):698-701. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.041954. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
8
For an ethics of promising, or: a few kind words about James Watson.关于承诺的伦理,或者:几句关于詹姆斯·沃森的好话。
New Genet Soc. 2005;24(2):157-73. doi: 10.1080/14636770500184792.
9
The ethics of 'public understanding of ethics'--why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients' voices.“公众对伦理学的理解”之伦理——生物伦理学专业知识纳入公众和患者声音的原因及方式
Med Health Care Philos. 2012 May;15(2):129-39. doi: 10.1007/s11019-011-9321-4.
10
Thinking critically in medicine and its ethics: relating applied science and applied ethics.医学及其伦理中的批判性思维:关联应用科学与应用伦理。
J Appl Philos. 1987;4(2):229-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.1987.tb00220.x.

引用本文的文献

1
An "Ethical Moment" in Data Sharing.数据共享中的“伦理时刻”。
Sci Technol Human Values. 2017 Jan;42(1):3-28. doi: 10.1177/0162243916648220. Epub 2016 May 13.
2
Empirical and philosophical analysis of physicians' judgments of medical indications.医生对医学指征判断的实证与哲学分析
Clin Ethics. 2016 Dec;11(4):190-199. doi: 10.1177/1477750916657666. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
3
Enhancement, ethics and society: towards an empirical research agenda for the medical humanities and social sciences.增强、伦理与社会:迈向医学人文与社会科学的实证研究议程
Med Humanit. 2015 Dec;41(2):136-42. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2015-010718. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
4
Debating DSM-5: diagnosis and the sociology of critique.关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版的辩论:诊断与批判社会学
J Med Ethics. 2014 Aug;40(8):521-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101762. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
5
On the nature and sociology of bioethics.论生命伦理学的本质与社会学。
Health Care Anal. 2013 Mar;21(1):54-69. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0234-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Research, engagement and public bioethics: promoting socially robust science.研究、参与和公共生物伦理学:促进具有社会韧性的科学。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Nov;37(11):698-701. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.041954. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
2
The rise of empirical research in medical ethics: a MacIntyrean critique and proposal.医学伦理学中实证研究的兴起:一种麦金太尔式的批判与提议。
J Med Philos. 2011 Apr;36(2):206-16. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhr001. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
3
'Promising' therapies: neuroscience, clinical practice, and the treatment of psychopathy.有前途的治疗方法:神经科学、临床实践和精神变态的治疗。
Sociol Health Illn. 2011 Mar;33(3):448-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01286.x. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
4
Ethical boundary-work in the infertility clinic.不孕不育诊所中的伦理边界工作。
Sociol Health Illn. 2011 May;33(4):570-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01308.x. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
5
Fresh or frozen? Classifying 'spare' embryos for donation to human embryonic stem cell research.新鲜的还是冷冻的?对捐赠给人类胚胎干细胞研究的“备用”胚胎进行分类。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Dec;71(12):2204-11. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.045. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
6
Public bioethics and public engagement: the politics of "proper talk".公共生命伦理学与公共参与:“恰当言说”的政治。
Public Underst Sci. 2010 Mar;19(2):197-211. doi: 10.1177/0963662508096781.
7
Bioethics and the reinforcement of socio-technical expectations.生物伦理学与社会技术期望的强化。
Soc Stud Sci. 2010 Apr;40(2):163-86. doi: 10.1177/0306312709349781.
8
Who's arguing? A call for reflexivity in bioethics.谁在争论?呼吁生物伦理学中的反思。
Bioethics. 2010 Jun;24(5):256-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01809.x.
9
Cryptic coercion.隐秘胁迫
Hastings Cent Rep. 2010 Jan-Feb;40(1):22-3. doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0225.
10
Why moral philosophers are not and should not be moral experts.为什么道德哲学家不是也不应该是道德专家。
Bioethics. 2011 Mar;25(3):119-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01748.x.

从“影响”到“维度”:社会中的科学、医学和伦理学。

From 'implications' to 'dimensions': science, medicine and ethics in society.

机构信息

Centre for Population Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2013 Mar;21(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0219-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10728-012-0219-y
PMID:22948440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3555237/
Abstract

Much bioethical scholarship is concerned with the social, legal and philosophical implications of new and emerging science and medicine, as well as with the processes of research that under-gird these innovations. Science and technology studies (STS), and the related and interpenetrating disciplines of anthropology and sociology, have also explored what novel technoscience might imply for society, and how the social is constitutive of scientific knowledge and technological artefacts. More recently, social scientists have interrogated the emergence of ethical issues: they have documented how particular matters come to be regarded as in some way to do with 'ethics', and how this in turn enjoins particular types of social action. In this paper, I will discuss some of this and other STS (and STS-inflected) literature and reflect on how it might complement more 'traditional' modes of bioethical enquiry. I argue that STS might (1) cast new light on current bioethical issues, (2) direct the gaze of bioethicists towards matters that may previously have escaped their attention, and (3) indicate the import not only of the ethical implications of biomedical innovation, but also how these innovative and other processes feature ethics as a dimension of everyday laboratory and clinical work. In sum, engagements between STS and bioethics are increasingly important in order to understand and manage the complex dynamics between science, medicine and ethics in society.

摘要

许多生物伦理学学术研究关注的是新出现的科学和医学的社会、法律和哲学影响,以及支撑这些创新的研究过程。科学技术研究(STS),以及与之相关和相互渗透的人类学和社会学学科,也探讨了新的技术科学可能对社会意味着什么,以及社会是如何构成科学知识和技术人工制品的。最近,社会科学家们对伦理问题的出现提出了质疑:他们记录了特定的问题是如何被认为在某种程度上与“伦理”有关的,以及这反过来又要求采取特定类型的社会行动。在本文中,我将讨论一些 STS(和 STS 影响)的文献,并思考它如何补充更“传统”的生物伦理探究模式。我认为 STS 可能(1)为当前的生物伦理问题提供新的视角,(2)引导生物伦理学家关注以前可能忽视的问题,(3)不仅表明生物医学创新的伦理影响的重要性,还表明这些创新和其他过程如何将伦理作为日常实验室和临床工作的一个维度。总之,STS 与生物伦理学之间的接触越来越重要,以便理解和管理科学、医学和伦理学在社会中的复杂动态。