Suppr超能文献

数据共享中的“伦理时刻”。

An "Ethical Moment" in Data Sharing.

作者信息

Heeney Catherine

机构信息

Science, Technology, and Innovation Studies, School of Social and Political Science, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Sci Technol Human Values. 2017 Jan;42(1):3-28. doi: 10.1177/0162243916648220. Epub 2016 May 13.

Abstract

This study draws on interviews with forty-nine members of a biomedical research community in the UK that is involved in negotiating data sharing and access. During an interview, an interviewee used the words "ethical moment" to describe a confrontation between collaborators in relation to data sharing. In this article, I use this as a lens for thinking about relations between "the conceptual and the empirical" in a way that allows both analyst and actor to challenge the status quo and consider other ethical possibilities. Drawing on actor network theory (ANT), I approach "the empirical" using the concepts of controversy and ontological uncertainty as methodological tools to tackle the problem of ethics. I suggest that these concepts also provide a bridge for understanding the ontological structure of the virtual and the actual, as described in Deleuze's . While other science and technology studies scholars have sought to draw on Deleuze, this article addresses the integration of ethics and empirical research. It arises as a critical reaction to existing treatments of this problem as found in empirical ethics, especially in the sociology of bioethics, and indirectly in ANT texts.

摘要

本研究基于对英国一个生物医学研究群体中49名成员的访谈,该群体参与数据共享与获取的协商。在一次访谈中,一名受访者用“伦理时刻”来描述合作者之间在数据共享方面的冲突。在本文中,我以此为视角来思考“概念与实证”之间的关系,这种方式能让分析者和行动者都对现状提出质疑,并考虑其他伦理可能性。借鉴行动者网络理论(ANT),我将争议和本体论不确定性的概念作为方法论工具来处理伦理问题,以此探讨“实证”。我认为这些概念也为理解如德勒兹所描述的虚拟与现实的本体论结构提供了桥梁。虽然其他科学技术研究学者试图借鉴德勒兹的理论,但本文关注的是伦理与实证研究的整合。它是对实证伦理学中,尤其是生物伦理学社会学以及ANT文本中间接出现的对该问题现有处理方式的批判性回应。

相似文献

1
An "Ethical Moment" in Data Sharing.数据共享中的“伦理时刻”。
Sci Technol Human Values. 2017 Jan;42(1):3-28. doi: 10.1177/0162243916648220. Epub 2016 May 13.

本文引用的文献

2
Toward methodological innovation in empirical ethics research.迈向实证伦理学研究的方法创新。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2012 Oct;21(4):466-80. doi: 10.1017/S0963180112000242.
3
Can Broad Consent be Informed Consent?宽泛同意能成为知情同意吗?
Public Health Ethics. 2011 Nov;4(3):226-235. doi: 10.1093/phe/phr020. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
5
Assessing the privacy risks of data sharing in genomics.评估基因组学数据共享中的隐私风险。
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(1):17-25. doi: 10.1159/000294150. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
8
Broadening consent--and diluting ethics?扩大同意范围——以及稀释伦理准则?
J Med Ethics. 2009 Feb;35(2):125-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024851.
9
From genetic privacy to open consent.从基因隐私到开放同意。
Nat Rev Genet. 2008 May;9(5):406-11. doi: 10.1038/nrg2360.
10
'Encounters with experience': empirical bioethics and the future.《与经验的邂逅》:实证生物伦理学与未来
Health Care Anal. 2008 Mar;16(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10728-007-0077-1. Epub 2007 Dec 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验