• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经 Optiscope™ 与常规喉镜行气管插管后血流动力学变化的比较。

A comparison of hemodynamic changes after endotracheal intubation by the Optiscope™ and the conventional laryngoscope.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Aug;63(2):130-5. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.2.130. Epub 2012 Aug 14.

DOI:10.4097/kjae.2012.63.2.130
PMID:22949980
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3427805/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optiscope™ is a newly developed video stylet device. This study evaluated and compared the hemodynamic changes observed after endotracheal intubation with video stylet and after conventional laryngoscopic endotracheal intubation.

METHODS

Fifty-eight adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class 1 or 2, undergoing general anesthesia, were randomized into two groups: one group of patients were intubated using video stylet (n = 29) and the other group were intubated using direct laryngoscope (n = 29). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), POGO (percentage of glottic opening) score, time for intubation and degree of sore throat were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the SBP, MAP, DBP, HR, and the sore throat incidence between the two groups. Optiscope™ produced better POGO scores, but time for intubation was longer than with conventional laryngoscope.

CONCLUSIONS

Optiscope™, when compared with conventional laryngoscope for intubation, does not modify the hemodynamic response, but it provides a better view of the vocal cords.

摘要

背景

Optiscope™ 是一种新开发的视频插管镜设备。本研究评估并比较了使用视频插管镜和传统喉镜进行气管插管后观察到的血流动力学变化。

方法

58 名美国麻醉医师协会（ASA）身体状况 1 级或 2 级的成年患者接受全身麻醉，随机分为两组：一组患者使用视频插管镜（n = 29）插管，另一组患者使用直接喉镜（n = 29）插管。记录收缩压（SBP）、平均动脉压（MAP）、舒张压（DBP）、心率（HR）、POGO（声门开放百分比）评分、插管时间和咽痛程度。

结果

两组患者的 SBP、MAP、DBP、HR 和咽痛发生率无显著差异。Optiscope™ 产生了更好的 POGO 评分，但插管时间比传统喉镜长。

结论

与传统喉镜相比，Optiscope™ 插管不会改变血流动力学反应，但它提供了更好的声带视图。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9e/3427805/ec599db3332f/kjae-63-130-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9e/3427805/9c1bf2059e0f/kjae-63-130-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9e/3427805/9a04ec6bf860/kjae-63-130-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9e/3427805/de4ca34f855e/kjae-63-130-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9e/3427805/74e5941e39c7/kjae-63-130-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9e/3427805/ec599db3332f/kjae-63-130-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9e/3427805/9c1bf2059e0f/kjae-63-130-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9e/3427805/9a04ec6bf860/kjae-63-130-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9e/3427805/de4ca34f855e/kjae-63-130-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9e/3427805/74e5941e39c7/kjae-63-130-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9e/3427805/ec599db3332f/kjae-63-130-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparison of hemodynamic changes after endotracheal intubation by the Optiscope™ and the conventional laryngoscope.经 Optiscope™ 与常规喉镜行气管插管后血流动力学变化的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Aug;63(2):130-5. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.2.130. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
2
A comparative study on the efficacy and cardiovascular response generated by macintosh and pentax-AWS video laryngoscopic endotracheal intubation methods.麦金托什喉镜和宾得AWS视频喉镜气管插管方法产生的效果及心血管反应的对比研究
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2009 Feb;56(2):146-150. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2009.56.2.146.
3
Comparison between video-lighted stylet (Intular Scope™) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in patients with normal airway.视频喉镜（Intular Scope™）与直接喉镜在正常气道患者气管插管中的比较。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Nov;48(11):300060520969532. doi: 10.1177/0300060520969532.
4
Hemodynamic changes following endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing cesarean section with general anesthesia: application of glidescope® videolaryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope.全身麻醉下行剖宫产术患者气管插管后的血流动力学变化：Glidescope®视频喉镜与直接喉镜的应用比较
Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Mar 30;5(2):e21836. doi: 10.5812/aapm.21836. eCollection 2015 Apr.
5
Hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation performed with video and direct laryngoscopy in patients scheduled for major cardiac surgery.在计划进行心脏大手术的患者中，视频喉镜和直接喉镜下气管插管的血流动力学反应。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jul 15;8(7):11477-83. eCollection 2015.
6
A Comparative Evaluation of Hemodynamic Response and Ease of Intubation using Airtraq and McCoy Laryngoscope.使用Airtraq喉镜和麦考伊喉镜对血流动力学反应及插管难易程度的比较评估
Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Jul-Sep;13(3):498-502. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_43_19.
7
The use of Airtraq laryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope and fiberoptic bronchoscope by experienced anesthesiologists.经验丰富的麻醉医生使用Airtraq喉镜与Macintosh喉镜及纤维支气管镜的比较。
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Jun;22(5):503-9.
8
Use of the fibreoptic stylet scope (Styletscope) reduces the hemodynamic response to intubation in normotensive and hypertensive patients.使用纤维光导芯喉镜（Styletscope）可降低血压正常和高血压患者插管时的血流动力学反应。
Can J Anaesth. 2001 Oct;48(9):919-23. doi: 10.1007/BF03017360.
9
[Comparison of hemodynamic responses to nasotracheal intubations with Glide Scope video-laryngoscope, Macintosh direct laryngoscope, and fiberoptic bronchoscope].[使用Glide Scope视频喉镜、麦金托什直接喉镜和纤维支气管镜进行鼻气管插管时血流动力学反应的比较]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2007 Feb;29(1):117-23.
10
Comparison of McGrath(®) Series 5 video laryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope: A prospective, randomised trial in patients with normal airways.麦格拉斯（®）5系列视频喉镜与麦金托什喉镜的比较：一项针对气道正常患者的前瞻性随机试验。
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Jul-Aug;32(4):869-74. doi: 10.12669/pjms.324.10037.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of backward, upward, rightward pressure maneuver for intubation using the OptiscopeTM: a retrospective study.使用OptiscopeTM进行插管时向后、向上、向右施压操作的效果：一项回顾性研究。
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021 Oct;16(4):391-397. doi: 10.17085/apm.21026. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
2
The Efficacy of Using Video Laryngoscopy on Tracheal Intubation by Novice Physicians.视频喉镜在新手医师气管插管中的应用效果
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jan;33(114):37-44. doi: 10.22038/ijorl.2020.43797.2447.
3
A comparative study of haemodynamic effects of single-blinded orotracheal intubations with intubating laryngeal mask airway, Macintosh and McGrath video laryngoscopes.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of Bonfils intubation fiberscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in difficult airways assisted with direct laryngoscopy.在直接喉镜辅助下，比较 Bonfils 插管纤维喉镜与纤维支气管镜在困难气道中的应用。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 Mar;58(3):249-55. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2010.58.3.249. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
2
The Bonfils intubation fibrescope: clinical evaluation and consideration of the learning curve.邦菲尔斯插管纤维镜：临床评估及对学习曲线的考量
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Jul;26(7):622-4. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328328f572.
3
Complications of emergency tracheal intubation: hemodynamic alterations--part I.
经口盲探气管插管与 Macintosh、McGrath 视频喉镜和插管型喉罩在血流动力学影响方面的比较研究。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(1):30-36. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.103663.
4
Endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery in the lateral position: a comparison between the intubating video stylet and fiberoptic intubating bronchoscopy.侧卧位施行开腹手术患者的经气管插管：管内插管视频喉镜与纤维支气管镜插管的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Jun;74(3):234-241. doi: 10.4097/kja.20384. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
5
Does glycopyrrolate premedication facilitate tracheal intubation with a rigid video-stylet?: A randomized controlled trial.格隆溴铵预处理是否有助于使用硬质可视探条进行气管插管？一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(32):e11834. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011834.
6
A comparative evaluation of Video Stylet and flexible fibre-optic bronchoscope in the performance of intubation in adult patients.成人患者插管操作中视频探条喉镜与可弯曲纤维支气管镜的比较评估
Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Apr;61(4):321-325. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_501_16.
7
Comparison of cardiac output and hemodynamic responses of intubation among different videolaryngoscopies in normotensive and hypertensive patients.正常血压和高血压患者中不同视频喉镜插管时的心输出量和血流动力学反应比较
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2015 Jun;35(3):432-438. doi: 10.1007/s11596-015-1449-7. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
8
Comparing GlideScope Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope Regarding Hemodynamic Responses During Orotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.比较GlideScope视频喉镜和麦金托什喉镜在经口气管插管期间的血流动力学反应：一项随机对照试验。
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Apr;16(4):e12334. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.12334. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
9
Optiscope® may have less stimulation on hemodynamic changes.Optiscope® 对血流动力学变化的刺激可能较小。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Apr;64(4):390-1. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.4.390.
紧急气管插管的并发症：血流动力学改变——第一部分
J Intensive Care Med. 2007 May-Jun;22(3):157-65. doi: 10.1177/0885066607299525.
4
Tracheal intubation using the Bonfils intubation fibrescope after failed direct laryngoscopy.直接喉镜检查失败后使用邦菲尔斯插管纤维镜进行气管插管。
Anaesthesia. 2004 Dec;59(12):1207-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03967.x.
5
New options for airway management: intubating fibreoptic stylets.气道管理的新选择：可插管光纤管芯
Br J Anaesth. 2003 Sep;91(3):408-18. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg011.
6
Hemodynamic responses among three tracheal intubation devices in normotensive and hypertensive patients.血压正常和高血压患者使用三种气管插管设备时的血流动力学反应。
Anesth Analg. 2003 Mar;96(3):890-895. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000048706.15720.C9.
7
Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with laryngoscope versus lightwand intubating device (Trachlight) in adults with normal airway.正常气道成年患者使用喉镜与光棒插管装置（Trachlight）行气管插管时的血流动力学反应
Anesth Analg. 2002 Aug;95(2):480-4, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200208000-00046.
8
Attenuation of haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation by the styletscope.
Br J Anaesth. 2001 Feb;86(2):275-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/86.2.275.
9
Difficult airway management: comparison of the Bullard laryngoscope with the video-optical intubation stylet.困难气道管理：Bullard喉镜与视频光学插管探条的比较
Can J Anaesth. 2000 Mar;47(3):280-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03018927.
10
Assessment of laryngeal view: percentage of glottic opening score vs Cormack and Lehane grading.喉镜视野评估：声门开口评分百分比与科马克和莱汉分级的比较
Can J Anaesth. 1999 Oct;46(10):987-90. doi: 10.1007/BF03013137.