Amir Syed Hussain, Ali Qazi Ehsan, Bansal Sonali
Department of Anesthesiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, AMU, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Apr;61(4):321-325. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_501_16.
Video Stylet (VS) is a new intubating modality that provides real-time video of endotracheal intubation (ETI). This device does not need alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes to view glottis and can be used in patients with limited mouth opening. The aim of this study was to compare flexible fibre-optic (FO) bronchoscope with VS in elective surgical patients in apparently normal airway patients requiring oral ETI.
Sixty patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia of age group 20-60 years, weight 40-70 kg, American Society of Anesthesiologist 1 and 2 and modified Mallampatti I and II were included in the study. Patients in group FO ( = 30) were intubated by flexible FO bronchoscope, whereas patients in group VS ( = 30) were intubated by VS. Primary outcome measure was time taken for intubation (TTI). Secondary outcome measures were successful intubation, haemodynamic response and post-operative complications if any.
Average TTI in cases of FO group was 38.2 s (95% confidence interval [CI] 36-41) and in VS group was 19.7 s (95% CI 19-21; = 0.0001). Three patients required a second attempt for successful intubation in FO group compared to eight in VS group ( = 0.2), with no failures in any group. Haemodynamic response and complications rate were greater in VS group; however, the differences were not statistically significant.
VS takes lesser time to intubate than flexible FO bronchoscope.
视频探条(VS)是一种新的插管方式,可提供气管内插管(ETI)的实时视频。该设备无需使口腔、咽部和气管轴线对齐即可观察声门,可用于张口受限的患者。本研究的目的是在气道看似正常、需要经口进行ETI的择期手术患者中,比较柔性纤维光学(FO)支气管镜与VS。
本研究纳入了60例年龄在20 - 60岁、体重40 - 70 kg、美国麻醉医师协会分级为1和2级、改良Mallampatti分级为I和II级的择期全身麻醉手术患者。FO组(n = 30)患者采用柔性FO支气管镜插管,而VS组(n = 30)患者采用VS插管。主要观察指标是插管时间(TTI)。次要观察指标包括插管成功情况、血流动力学反应以及术后并发症(如有)。
FO组患者的平均TTI为38.2秒(95%置信区间[CI] 36 - 41),VS组为19.7秒(95% CI 19 - 21;P = 0.0001)。FO组有3例患者需要二次尝试才能成功插管,而VS组有8例(P = 0.2),两组均无插管失败病例。VS组的血流动力学反应和并发症发生率更高;然而,差异无统计学意义。
VS插管所需时间比柔性FO支气管镜短。