Suppr超能文献

成人患者插管操作中视频探条喉镜与可弯曲纤维支气管镜的比较评估

A comparative evaluation of Video Stylet and flexible fibre-optic bronchoscope in the performance of intubation in adult patients.

作者信息

Amir Syed Hussain, Ali Qazi Ehsan, Bansal Sonali

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, AMU, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Apr;61(4):321-325. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_501_16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Video Stylet (VS) is a new intubating modality that provides real-time video of endotracheal intubation (ETI). This device does not need alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes to view glottis and can be used in patients with limited mouth opening. The aim of this study was to compare flexible fibre-optic (FO) bronchoscope with VS in elective surgical patients in apparently normal airway patients requiring oral ETI.

METHODS

Sixty patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia of age group 20-60 years, weight 40-70 kg, American Society of Anesthesiologist 1 and 2 and modified Mallampatti I and II were included in the study. Patients in group FO ( = 30) were intubated by flexible FO bronchoscope, whereas patients in group VS ( = 30) were intubated by VS. Primary outcome measure was time taken for intubation (TTI). Secondary outcome measures were successful intubation, haemodynamic response and post-operative complications if any.

RESULTS

Average TTI in cases of FO group was 38.2 s (95% confidence interval [CI] 36-41) and in VS group was 19.7 s (95% CI 19-21; = 0.0001). Three patients required a second attempt for successful intubation in FO group compared to eight in VS group ( = 0.2), with no failures in any group. Haemodynamic response and complications rate were greater in VS group; however, the differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

VS takes lesser time to intubate than flexible FO bronchoscope.

摘要

背景与目的

视频探条(VS)是一种新的插管方式,可提供气管内插管(ETI)的实时视频。该设备无需使口腔、咽部和气管轴线对齐即可观察声门,可用于张口受限的患者。本研究的目的是在气道看似正常、需要经口进行ETI的择期手术患者中,比较柔性纤维光学(FO)支气管镜与VS。

方法

本研究纳入了60例年龄在20 - 60岁、体重40 - 70 kg、美国麻醉医师协会分级为1和2级、改良Mallampatti分级为I和II级的择期全身麻醉手术患者。FO组(n = 30)患者采用柔性FO支气管镜插管,而VS组(n = 30)患者采用VS插管。主要观察指标是插管时间(TTI)。次要观察指标包括插管成功情况、血流动力学反应以及术后并发症(如有)。

结果

FO组患者的平均TTI为38.2秒(95%置信区间[CI] 36 - 41),VS组为19.7秒(95% CI 19 - 21;P = 0.0001)。FO组有3例患者需要二次尝试才能成功插管,而VS组有8例(P = 0.2),两组均无插管失败病例。VS组的血流动力学反应和并发症发生率更高;然而,差异无统计学意义。

结论

VS插管所需时间比柔性FO支气管镜短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afea/5416722/7cd16c356639/IJA-61-321-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验