• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多个加性位点的进化导致了在雄蝇求爱时翅膀划动期间,Drosophila yakuba 和 D. santomea 之间的分歧。

Evolution of multiple additive loci caused divergence between Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea in wing rowing during male courtship.

机构信息

Institut de Biologie du Developpement de Marseille-Luminy, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043888. Epub 2012 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0043888
PMID:22952802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3431401/
Abstract

In Drosophila, male flies perform innate, stereotyped courtship behavior. This innate behavior evolves rapidly between fly species, and is likely to have contributed to reproductive isolation and species divergence. We currently understand little about the neurobiological and genetic mechanisms that contributed to the evolution of courtship behavior. Here we describe a novel behavioral difference between the two closely related species D. yakuba and D. santomea: the frequency of wing rowing during courtship. During courtship, D. santomea males repeatedly rotate their wing blades to face forward and then back (rowing), while D. yakuba males rarely row their wings. We found little intraspecific variation in the frequency of wing rowing for both species. We exploited multiplexed shotgun genotyping (MSG) to genotype two backcross populations with a single lane of Illumina sequencing. We performed quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using the ancestry information estimated by MSG and found that the species difference in wing rowing mapped to four or five genetically separable regions. We found no evidence that these loci display epistasis. The identified loci all act in the same direction and can account for most of the species difference.

摘要

在果蝇中,雄性果蝇表现出先天的、刻板的求偶行为。这种先天行为在不同的果蝇物种之间迅速进化,很可能促成了生殖隔离和物种分化。我们目前对促成求偶行为进化的神经生物学和遗传机制知之甚少。在这里,我们描述了两个密切相关的物种 D. yakuba 和 D. santomea 之间的一种新的行为差异:求偶过程中的翅膀划动频率。在求偶过程中,D. santomea 雄蝇反复将翅膀叶片旋转到面向前方,然后再向后(划动),而 D. yakuba 雄蝇很少划动翅膀。我们发现这两个物种的翅膀划动频率在种内几乎没有变化。我们利用多重散弹枪基因分型(MSG)在单条 Illumina 测序的两个回交群体中进行基因分型。我们利用 MSG 估计的祖先信息进行数量性状基因座(QTL)作图,发现翅膀划动的物种差异映射到四个或五个在遗传上可分离的区域。我们没有发现这些位点存在上位性的证据。鉴定出的位点都朝着同一个方向作用,可以解释大部分的物种差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0556/3431401/e5d8c0b8d2a2/pone.0043888.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0556/3431401/76bd6143e733/pone.0043888.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0556/3431401/ac0aea6771c6/pone.0043888.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0556/3431401/eef7d790cdee/pone.0043888.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0556/3431401/e5d8c0b8d2a2/pone.0043888.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0556/3431401/76bd6143e733/pone.0043888.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0556/3431401/ac0aea6771c6/pone.0043888.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0556/3431401/eef7d790cdee/pone.0043888.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0556/3431401/e5d8c0b8d2a2/pone.0043888.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolution of multiple additive loci caused divergence between Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea in wing rowing during male courtship.多个加性位点的进化导致了在雄蝇求爱时翅膀划动期间,Drosophila yakuba 和 D. santomea 之间的分歧。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043888. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
2
The genetic architecture of coordinately evolving male wing pigmentation and courtship behavior in Drosophila elegans and Drosophila gunungcola.秀丽果蝇和古龙果蝇中协同进化的雄性翅色素沉着与求偶行为的遗传结构
G3 (Bethesda). 2014 Aug 27;4(11):2079-93. doi: 10.1534/g3.114.013037.
3
The genetic basis of prezygotic reproductive isolation between Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba due to mating preference.由于交配偏好导致的桑托梅果蝇和雅库布果蝇之间合子前生殖隔离的遗传基础。
Genetics. 2006 May;173(1):215-23. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.052993. Epub 2006 Mar 1.
4
The genetic basis of postzygotic reproductive isolation between Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba due to hybrid male sterility.由于杂种雄性不育导致的桑托梅果蝇和雅库布果蝇之间合子后生殖隔离的遗传基础。
Genetics. 2006 May;173(1):225-33. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.052985. Epub 2006 Mar 1.
5
A Major Locus Controls a Genital Shape Difference Involved in Reproductive Isolation Between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea.一个主要基因座控制着涉及雅库布果蝇和圣多美果蝇生殖隔离的生殖器形状差异。
G3 (Bethesda). 2015 Oct 28;5(12):2893-901. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.023481.
6
Quantitative trait loci affecting the difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea.影响雅库布果蝇和桑托梅果蝇色素沉着差异的数量性状基因座。
Genetics. 2005 Sep;171(1):211-25. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.044412. Epub 2005 Jun 21.
7
Co-evolving wing spots and mating displays are genetically separable traits in Drosophila.果蝇中翅膀斑点和交配展示的共同进化是遗传上可分离的特征。
Evolution. 2020 Jun;74(6):1098-1111. doi: 10.1111/evo.13990. Epub 2020 May 17.
8
Genetics of divergence in male wing pigmentation and courtship behavior between Drosophila elegans and D. gunungcola.秀丽果蝇和古龙果蝇之间雄性翅色素沉着及求偶行为差异的遗传学
Heredity (Edinb). 2006 May;96(5):383-95. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800814.
9
Divergence and correlated evolution of male wing spot and courtship display between Drosophila nepalensis and D. trilutea.尼泊尔果蝇和三色果蝇雄性翅斑与求偶行为的趋异及协同进化
Insect Sci. 2022 Oct;29(5):1445-1460. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12994. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
10
Do quantitative trait loci (QTL) for a courtship song difference between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia coincide with candidate genes and intraspecific QTL?拟果蝇和谢岛果蝇求偶歌差异的数量性状基因座(QTL)是否与候选基因和种内QTL一致?
Genetics. 2004 Mar;166(3):1303-11. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.3.1303.

引用本文的文献

1
Genomic Islands of Divergence Between Drosophila yakuba Subspecies are Predominantly Driven by Chromosomal Inversions and the Recombination Landscape.雅库布果蝇亚种间的基因组差异岛主要由染色体倒位和重组景观驱动。
Mol Ecol. 2025 Feb;34(3):e17627. doi: 10.1111/mec.17627. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
2
Two major-effect loci influence interspecific mating in females of the sibling species, Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia.两个主效基因座影响近缘物种拟暗果蝇和塞舌尔果蝇雌性个体的种间交配。
G3 (Bethesda). 2025 Feb 5;15(2). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae279.
3
Evolution of assortative mating following selective introgression of pigmentation genes between two species.

本文引用的文献

1
Two distinct genomic regions, harbouring the period and fruitless genes, affect male courtship song in Drosophila montana.两个不同的基因组区域,包含 period 和 fruitless 基因,影响了黑腹果蝇的雄性求爱歌曲。
Heredity (Edinb). 2012 Jun;108(6):602-8. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2011.129. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
2
The genetics of speciation: genes of small effect underlie sexual isolation in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala.物种形成的遗传学:夏威夷蟋蟀 Laupala 中性隔离的微小效应基因。
J Evol Biol. 2011 May;24(5):1110-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02244.x. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
3
Multiplexed shotgun genotyping for rapid and efficient genetic mapping.
两个物种之间色素沉着基因选择性渗入后选型交配的进化
Ecol Evol. 2022 Apr 13;12(4):e8821. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8821. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
A framework for studying behavioral evolution by reconstructing ancestral repertoires.通过重建祖先行为库来研究行为进化的框架。
Elife. 2021 Sep 2;10:e61806. doi: 10.7554/eLife.61806.
5
A morphological trait involved in reproductive isolation between Drosophila sister species is sensitive to temperature.果蝇姐妹物种之间生殖隔离所涉及的一种形态特征对温度敏感。
Ecol Evol. 2021 May 25;11(12):7492-7506. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7580. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Visual mate preference evolution during butterfly speciation is linked to neural processing genes.蝴蝶物种形成过程中的视觉配偶偏好进化与神经处理基因有关。
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 21;11(1):4763. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18609-z.
7
Co-evolving wing spots and mating displays are genetically separable traits in Drosophila.果蝇中翅膀斑点和交配展示的共同进化是遗传上可分离的特征。
Evolution. 2020 Jun;74(6):1098-1111. doi: 10.1111/evo.13990. Epub 2020 May 17.
8
Versatile simulations of admixture and accurate local ancestry inference with mixnmatch and ancestryinfer.混合模拟和准确的局部亲缘关系推断的多功能仿真:mixnmatch 和 ancestryinfer。
Mol Ecol Resour. 2020 Jul;20(4):1141-1151. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13175. Epub 2020 May 25.
9
Behavioral Evolution of : Unraveling the Circuit Basis.行为进化研究:揭示电路基础
Genes (Basel). 2020 Feb 1;11(2):157. doi: 10.3390/genes11020157.
10
Evolution of maternal and zygotic mRNA complements in the early Drosophila embryo.果蝇早期胚胎中母源和合子 mRNA 补充物的演变。
PLoS Genet. 2018 Dec 17;14(12):e1007838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007838. eCollection 2018 Dec.
多重散弹枪基因分型技术用于快速高效的遗传作图。
Genome Res. 2011 Apr;21(4):610-7. doi: 10.1101/gr.115402.110. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
4
Transgenic tools for members of the genus Drosophila with sequenced genomes.具有测序基因组的果蝇属成员的转基因工具。
Fly (Austin). 2010 Oct-Dec;4(4):349-62. doi: 10.4161/fly.4.4.13304. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
5
Sexual isolation of male moths explained by a single pheromone response QTL containing four receptor genes.雄蛾通过单一包含四个受体基因的信息素反应 QTL 实现性隔离。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 11;107(19):8660-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910945107. Epub 2010 Apr 19.
6
A microsatellite linkage map for Drosophila montana shows large variation in recombination rates, and a courtship song trait maps to an area of low recombination.蒙塔那果蝇的微卫星连锁图谱显示出重组率的巨大差异,求偶歌曲特征映射到一个低重组区域。
J Evol Biol. 2010 Mar;23(3):518-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01916.x. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
7
Evolution of the tan locus contributed to pigment loss in Drosophila santomea: a response to Matute et al.棕斑 locus 的进化导致了 Drosophila santomea 色素的丧失:对 Matute 等人的回应。
Cell. 2009 Dec 11;139(6):1189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.004.
8
Genetic and molecular insights into the development and evolution of sexual dimorphism.对性别二态性发育和进化的遗传及分子见解。
Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Nov;10(11):797-804. doi: 10.1038/nrg2687.
9
A role for a neo-sex chromosome in stickleback speciation.新性染色体在棘鱼物种形成中的作用。
Nature. 2009 Oct 22;461(7267):1079-83. doi: 10.1038/nature08441. Epub 2009 Sep 27.
10
Identification of quantitative trait loci function through analysis of multiple cuticular hydrocarbons differing between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia females.通过分析模拟果蝇和塞舌尔果蝇雌蝇之间存在差异的多种表皮碳氢化合物,鉴定数量性状基因座的功能。
Heredity (Edinb). 2009 Nov;103(5):416-24. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2009.79. Epub 2009 Aug 5.