The Department of Medicines Management and Informatics, Region Skåne, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;69(3):647-55. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1368-5. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
To examine the impact of a new model of care, in which a clinical pharmacist conducts structured medication reviews and a multi-professional team collates systematic medication care plans, on the number of unidentified DRPs in a hospital setting.
In a prospective two-period study, patients admitted to an internal medicine ward at the University Hospital of Lund, Sweden, were included if they were ≥ 65 years old, used ≥ 3 medications on a regular basis and had stayed on the ward for ≥ 5 weekdays. Intervention patients were given the new model of care and control patients received conventional care. DRPs were then retrospectively identified after study completion from blinded patient records for both intervention and control patients. Two pairs of evaluators independently evaluated and classified these DRPs as having been identified/unidentified during the hospital stay and according to type and clinical significance. The primary endpoint was the number of unidentified DRPs, and the secondary endpoints were the numbers of unidentified DRPs within each type and clinical significance category.
The study included a total of 141 (70 intervention and 71 control) patients. The intervention group benefited from a reduction in the total number of unidentified DRPs per patient during the hospital stay: intervention group median 1 (1st-3rd quartile 0-2), control group 9 (6-13.5) (p < 0.001), and also in the number of medications associated with unidentified DRPs per patient: intervention group 1 (0-2), control group 8 (5-10) (p < 0.001). All sub-categories of DRPs that were frequent in the control group were significantly reduced in the intervention group. Similarly, the DRPs were less clinically significant in the intervention group.
A multi-professional team, including a clinical pharmacist, conducting structured medication reviews and collating systematic medication care plans proved very effective in reducing the number of unidentified DRPs for elderly in-patients.
考察一种新的护理模式对医院环境下未识别用药问题(DRP)数量的影响,该模式中临床药师对患者进行结构化药物审查,多专业团队制定系统的药物护理计划。
采用前瞻性两阶段研究,纳入 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间在瑞典隆德大学医院内科病房住院且年龄≥65 岁、长期使用≥3 种常规药物、住院时间≥5 个工作日的患者。干预组患者接受新模式护理,对照组患者接受常规护理。完成研究后,从盲法患者记录中回顾性识别干预组和对照组患者的 DRP。两位评估员独立评估并根据在院期间是否识别、类型和临床意义对 DRP 进行分类。主要终点为未识别 DRP 的数量,次要终点为每种类型和临床意义类别中的未识别 DRP 数量。
本研究共纳入 141 例患者(70 例干预组和 71 例对照组)。与对照组相比,干预组患者在住院期间的每位患者的总未识别 DRP 数量有所减少:干预组中位数 1(1 四分位距至 3 四分位距 0-2),对照组 9(6-13.5)(p<0.001),每位患者与未识别 DRP 相关的药物数量也有所减少:干预组 1(0-2),对照组 8(5-10)(p<0.001)。对照组中常见的所有 DRP 亚类在干预组中均显著减少。同样,干预组的 DRP 临床意义也较小。
包括临床药师在内的多专业团队进行结构化药物审查和制定系统的药物护理计划可有效减少老年住院患者的未识别 DRP 数量。