Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan;36(1):27-33. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0720. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
To examine the patterns and associations of insulin regimens and change in regimens with clinical outcomes in a diverse population of children with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes.
The study sample consisted of youth with type 1 diabetes who completed a baseline SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study visit after being newly diagnosed and at least one follow-up visit. Demographic, diabetes self-management, physical, and laboratory measures were collected at study visits. Insulin regimens and change in regimen compared with the initial visit were categorized as more intensive (MI), no change (NC), or less intensive (LI). We examined relationships between insulin regimens, change in regimen, and outcomes including A1C and fasting C-peptide.
Of the 1,606 participants with a mean follow-up of 36 months, 51.7% changed to an MI regimen, 44.7% had NC, and 3.6% changed to an LI regimen. Participants who were younger, non-Hispanic white, and from families of higher income and parental education and who had private health insurance were more likely to be in MI or NC groups. Those in MI and NC groups had lower baseline A1C (P = 0.028) and smaller increase in A1C over time than LI (P < 0.01). Younger age, continuous subcutaneous insulin pump therapy, and change to MI were associated with higher probability of achieving target A1C levels.
Insulin regimens were intensified over time in over half of participants but varied by sociodemographic domains. As more intensive regimens were associated with better outcomes, early intensification of management may improve outcomes in all children with diabetes. Although intensification of insulin regimen is preferred, choice of insulin regimen must be individualized based on the child and family's ability to comply with the prescribed plan.
在一个患有新诊断 1 型糖尿病的多元化儿童群体中,研究胰岛素方案的模式和关联及其与临床结果的变化。
研究样本由在新诊断后完成 SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth 研究访问的青少年组成,且至少有一次随访。在研究访问时收集人口统计学、糖尿病自我管理、身体和实验室测量值。将胰岛素方案和与初始访问相比的方案变化归类为更强化(MI)、无变化(NC)或更不强化(LI)。我们研究了胰岛素方案、方案变化与 A1C 和空腹 C 肽等结果之间的关系。
在 1606 名参与者中,平均随访 36 个月,51.7%转为 MI 方案,44.7%为 NC,3.6%转为 LI 方案。年龄较小、非西班牙裔白人、家庭收入和父母教育程度较高、有私人医疗保险的参与者更有可能处于 MI 或 NC 组。MI 和 NC 组的基线 A1C 较低(P = 0.028),且随时间的 A1C 增加幅度小于 LI 组(P < 0.01)。年龄较小、持续皮下胰岛素泵治疗和转为 MI 与实现目标 A1C 水平的概率更高相关。
超过一半的参与者的胰岛素方案随时间得到强化,但存在社会人口统计学领域的差异。由于更强化的方案与更好的结果相关,因此早期强化管理可能会改善所有糖尿病儿童的结果。尽管强化胰岛素方案是首选,但必须根据儿童和家庭遵守规定方案的能力来个体化选择胰岛素方案。