• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在重复囚徒困境中,三个人就太多了:关于互惠行为的实验证据。

Three is a crowd in iterated prisoner's dilemmas: experimental evidence on reciprocal behavior.

机构信息

Grupo Interdisciplinar de Sistemas Complejos, Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganés, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2012;2:638. doi: 10.1038/srep00638. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1038/srep00638
PMID:22962633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3435562/
Abstract

Reciprocity or conditional cooperation is one of the most prominent mechanisms proposed to explain the emergence of cooperation in social dilemmas. Recent experimental findings on networked games suggest that conditional cooperation may also depend on the previous action of the player. We here report on experiments on iterated, multi-player Prisoner's dilemma, on groups of 2 to 5 people. We confirm the dependence on the previous step and that memory effects for earlier periods are not significant. We show that the behavior of subjects in pairwise dilemmas is qualitatively different from the cases with more players; After an initial decay, cooperation increases significantly reaching values above 80%. The strategy of the players is rather universal as far as their willingness to reciprocate cooperation is concerned, whereas there is much diversity in their initial propensity to cooperate. Our results indicate that, for cooperation to emerge and thrive, three is a crowd.

摘要

互惠或条件合作是解释社会困境中合作出现的最突出机制之一。最近关于网络博弈的实验结果表明,条件合作也可能取决于参与者的先前行为。我们在这里报告了关于迭代、多人囚徒困境的实验,参与者为 2 到 5 人一组。我们证实了对前一步的依赖性,并且早期阶段的记忆效应并不显著。我们表明,在双人困境中,主体的行为与更多参与者的情况有很大不同;在初始衰减之后,合作显著增加,达到 80%以上。只要参与者愿意回报合作,他们的策略就相当普遍,而他们最初合作的倾向则存在很大差异。我们的结果表明,要想合作出现并蓬勃发展,三人成众。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc97/3435562/2fd817520b56/srep00638-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc97/3435562/3db6d8d1a7a8/srep00638-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc97/3435562/2fd817520b56/srep00638-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc97/3435562/3db6d8d1a7a8/srep00638-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc97/3435562/2fd817520b56/srep00638-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Three is a crowd in iterated prisoner's dilemmas: experimental evidence on reciprocal behavior.在重复囚徒困境中,三个人就太多了:关于互惠行为的实验证据。
Sci Rep. 2012;2:638. doi: 10.1038/srep00638. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
2
Learning dynamics explains human behaviour in prisoner's dilemma on networks.学习动力学解释了网络囚徒困境中的人类行为。
J R Soc Interface. 2014 Feb 19;11(94):20131186. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.1186. Print 2014 May 6.
3
On the coexistence of cooperators,defectors and conditional cooperators in the multiplayer iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.在多人重复囚徒困境中合作者、背叛者和条件合作者的共存。
J Theor Biol. 2012 May 7;300:299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.02.003.
4
Human cooperation in social dilemmas: comparing the Snowdrift game with the Prisoner's Dilemma.社会困境中的人类合作:将雪堆博弈与囚徒困境进行比较。
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Dec 7;274(1628):2965-70. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0793.
5
Collapse of cooperation in evolving games.进化博弈中合作的瓦解。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 9;111(49):17558-63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1408618111. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
6
Chaos, oscillation and the evolution of indirect reciprocity in n-person games.n 人博弈中的混沌、振荡与间接互惠的演化
J Theor Biol. 2008 Jun 21;252(4):686-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Feb 16.
7
Sequential interactions-in which one player plays first and another responds-promote cooperation in evolutionary-dynamical simulations of single-shot Prisoner's Dilemma and Snowdrift games.在单次囚徒困境和雪堆博弈的进化动力学模拟中,顺序交互(一个玩家先玩,另一个玩家响应)促进了合作。
J Theor Biol. 2018 Sep 7;452:69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 21.
8
A comparative analysis of spatial Prisoner's Dilemma experiments: conditional cooperation and payoff irrelevance.空间囚徒困境实验的比较分析:条件合作与收益无关性
Sci Rep. 2014 Apr 11;4:4615. doi: 10.1038/srep04615.
9
Resolving the iterated prisoner's dilemma: theory and reality.解决重复囚徒困境:理论与现实。
J Evol Biol. 2011 Aug;24(8):1628-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02307.x. Epub 2011 May 23.
10
Evolutionary dynamics of the continuous iterated prisoner's dilemma.连续重复囚徒困境的进化动力学
J Theor Biol. 2007 Mar 21;245(2):258-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.09.016. Epub 2006 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A neurocognitive mechanism for increased cooperation during group formation.群体形成过程中合作增加的神经认知机制。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Dec 23;2(1):127. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00177-3.
2
Inferring strategies from observations in long iterated Prisoner's dilemma experiments.从长迭代囚徒困境实验中的观察结果推断策略。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 9;12(1):7589. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11654-2.
3
Factors of influence in prisoner's dilemma task: a review of medical literature.囚徒困境任务中的影响因素:医学文献综述

本文引用的文献

1
Heterogeneous networks do not promote cooperation when humans play a Prisoner's Dilemma.当人类玩囚徒困境时,异质网络不会促进合作。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Aug 7;109(32):12922-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206681109. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
2
Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma contains strategies that dominate any evolutionary opponent.迭代囚徒困境包含了能够支配任何进化对手的策略。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 26;109(26):10409-13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206569109. Epub 2012 May 21.
3
On the coexistence of cooperators,defectors and conditional cooperators in the multiplayer iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.
PeerJ. 2022 Jan 28;10:e12829. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12829. eCollection 2022.
4
Use of a controlled experiment and computational models to measure the impact of sequential peer exposures on decision making.使用对照实验和计算模型来衡量连续同伴接触对决策的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0234875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234875. eCollection 2020.
5
A quantitative description of the transition between intuitive altruism and rational deliberation in iterated Prisoner's Dilemma experiments.在迭代囚徒困境实验中,直观利他主义和理性思考之间的转变的定量描述。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 19;9(1):17046. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52359-3.
6
Large scale and information effects on cooperation in public good games.大规模和信息效应对公共物品博弈中合作的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 21;9(1):15023. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50964-w.
7
Group size effects and critical mass in public goods games.群体规模效应对公共物品博弈的影响和关键质量。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 2;9(1):5503. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41988-3.
8
Direct reciprocity and model-predictive rationality explain network reciprocity over social ties.直接互惠和基于模型的理性可以解释网络互惠如何跨越社会关系。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 1;9(1):5367. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41547-w.
9
Groups and scores: the decline of cooperation.群体和分数:合作的衰落。
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Jul;15(144). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0158.
10
Collaborative hierarchy maintains cooperation in asymmetric games.协作层级关系维持非对称博弈中的合作。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 29;8(1):5375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23681-z.
在多人重复囚徒困境中合作者、背叛者和条件合作者的共存。
J Theor Biol. 2012 May 7;300:299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.02.003.
4
Human behavior in Prisoner's Dilemma experiments suppresses network reciprocity.囚徒困境实验中的人类行为抑制了网络互惠性。
Sci Rep. 2012;2:325. doi: 10.1038/srep00325. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
5
Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans.动态社交网络促进了人类实验中的合作。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 29;108(48):19193-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108243108. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
6
Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation.行为和社会网络结构的共同进化促进了人类的合作。
Ecol Lett. 2011 Jun;14(6):546-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01615.x. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
7
Social experiments in the mesoscale: humans playing a spatial prisoner's dilemma.中观尺度上的社会实验:人类玩空间囚徒困境游戏。
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 12;5(11):e13749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013749.
8
How is human cooperation different?人类合作有何不同?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2663-74. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0157.
9
Evolutionary game theory: Temporal and spatial effects beyond replicator dynamics.进化博弈论:复制者动态之外的时空效应。
Phys Life Rev. 2009 Dec;6(4):208-49. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
10
Human strategy updating in evolutionary games.人类在进化博弈中的策略更新。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 16;107(7):2962-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912515107. Epub 2010 Feb 8.