Suppr超能文献

递增负荷功率自行车试验的代谢参数。

Metabolic parameters for ramp versus step incremental cycle ergometer tests.

机构信息

Department of Exercise Science, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.

出版信息

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012 Dec;37(6):1110-7. doi: 10.1139/h2012-098. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine mean differences and the patterns of responses for oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O(2)), heart rate (HR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) for ramp (15 W·min(-1)) versus step (30 W increments every 2 min) incremental cycle ergometer tests. Fourteen subjects (age and body mass of 23.2 ± 3.1 (mean ± SD ) years and 71.1 ± 10.1 kg, respectively) visited the laboratory on separate occasions. Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs with appropriate follow-up procedures, as well as paired t tests, were used to analyze the data. In addition, polynomial regression analyses were used to determine the patterns of responses for each dependent variable for the ramp and step tests. The ramp protocol resulted in lower mean [Formula: see text]O(2) and HR values at the common power outputs than the step protocol with no differences in RPE. The increased amount of work performed during the step (total work = 75.83 kJ) versus ramp (total work = 65.60 kJ) tests at the common power outputs may have contributed to the greater [Formula: see text]O(2) and HR values. The polynomial regression analyses showed that most subjects had the same patterns of responses for the ramp and step incremental tests for HR (86%) and RPE (93%) but different patterns for [Formula: see text]O(2) (71%). The findings from the present study suggested that the protocol selection for an incremental cycle ergometer test can affect the mean values for [Formula: see text]O(2) and HR, as well as the [Formula: see text]O(2) - power output relationship.

摘要

本研究旨在比较递增功率自行车试验中,斜坡(15 W·min(-1))与台阶(每 2 分钟增加 30 W)方案下摄氧量([Formula: see text]O(2))、心率(HR)和主观体力感觉等级(RPE)的平均值差异和反应模式。14 名受试者(年龄和体重分别为 23.2 ± 3.1 岁和 71.1 ± 10.1kg)分别在不同时间到实验室进行测试。采用双向重复测量方差分析和适当的后续检验,以及配对 t 检验对数据进行分析。此外,还采用多项式回归分析来确定斜坡和台阶试验中每个因变量的反应模式。与台阶方案相比,斜坡方案在相同的功率输出下,平均[Formula: see text]O(2)和 HR 值更低,但 RPE 没有差异。在相同的功率输出下,台阶(总工作量=75.83 kJ)比斜坡(总工作量=65.60 kJ)方案下完成的工作量更多,这可能导致[Formula: see text]O(2)和 HR 值更高。多项式回归分析表明,大多数受试者在 HR(86%)和 RPE(93%)的斜坡和台阶递增试验中具有相同的反应模式,但[Formula: see text]O(2)的反应模式不同(71%)。本研究结果表明,递增功率自行车试验方案的选择可能会影响[Formula: see text]O(2)和 HR 的平均值,以及[Formula: see text]O(2)-功率输出关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验