Department of Medicine, Division of General Practice, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Elsässerstr, 2 m, Freiburg, 79110, Germany.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012 Sep 11;12:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-12-73.
Hypertension is one of the key factors causing cardiovascular diseases which make up the most frequent cause of death in industrialised nations. However about 60% of hypertensive patients in Germany treated with antihypertensives do not reach the recommended target blood pressure. The involvement of patients in medical decision making fulfils not only an ethical imperative but, furthermore, has the potential of higher treatment success. One concept to enhance the active role of patients is shared decision making. Until now there exists little information on the effects of shared decision making trainings for general practitioners on patient participation and on lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients.
METHODS/DESIGN: In a cluster-randomised controlled trial 1800 patients receiving antihypertensives will be screened with 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in their general practitioners' practices. Only patients who have not reached their blood pressure target (approximately 1200) will remain in the study (T1 - T3). General practitioners of the intervention group will take part in a shared decision making-training after baseline assessment (T0). General practitioners of the control group will treat their patients as usual. Primary endpoints are change of systolic blood pressure and change of patients' perceived participation. Secondary endpoints are changes of diastolic blood pressure, knowledge, medical adherence and cardiovascular risk. Data analysis will be performed with mixed effects models.
The hypothesis underlying this study is that shared decision making, realised by a shared decision making training for general practitioners, activates patients, facilitates patients' empowerment and contributes to a better hypertension control. This study is the first one that tests this hypothesis with a (cluster-) randomised trial and a large sample size.
高血压是导致心血管疾病的关键因素之一,而心血管疾病是工业化国家最常见的死亡原因。然而,在德国,接受抗高血压药物治疗的高血压患者中,约有 60%未达到推荐的血压目标。患者参与医疗决策不仅符合伦理要求,而且有可能提高治疗效果。增强患者积极作用的一个概念是共同决策。到目前为止,关于一般实践医生共同决策培训对患者参与和降低高血压患者血压的影响的信息还很少。
方法/设计:在一项整群随机对照试验中,将对 1800 名接受抗高血压药物治疗的患者进行 24 小时动态血压监测,以筛选出他们的医生的实践。只有未达到血压目标(约 1200)的患者才会留在研究中(T1-T3)。干预组的全科医生将在基线评估后(T0)参加共同决策培训。对照组的全科医生将按照常规治疗他们的患者。主要终点是收缩压的变化和患者感知的参与度的变化。次要终点是舒张压、知识、医疗依从性和心血管风险的变化。数据分析将采用混合效应模型进行。
这项研究的假设是,通过对全科医生进行共同决策培训来实现共同决策,可以激活患者,促进患者的赋权,并有助于更好地控制高血压。这项研究是第一个用(整群)随机试验和大样本量来检验这一假设的研究。