• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用神经解剖学的单个体素模式识别来区分前驱期和首发精神病。

Distinguishing prodromal from first-episode psychosis using neuroanatomical single-subject pattern recognition.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Schizophr Bull. 2013 Sep;39(5):1105-14. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs095. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbs095
PMID:22969150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3756775/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The at-risk mental state for psychosis (ARMS) and the first episode of psychosis have been associated with structural brain abnormalities that could aid in the individualized early recognition of psychosis. However, it is unknown whether the development of these brain alterations predates the clinical deterioration of at-risk individuals, or alternatively, whether it parallels the transition to psychosis at the single-subject level.

METHODS

We evaluated the performance of an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based classification system in classifying disease stages from at-risk individuals with subsequent transition to psychosis (ARMS-T) and patients with first-episode psychosis (FE). Pairwise and multigroup biomarkers were constructed using the structural MRI data of 22 healthy controls (HC), 16 ARMS-T and 23 FE subjects. The performance of these biomarkers was measured in unseen test cases using repeated nested cross-validation.

RESULTS

The classification accuracies in the HC vs FE, HC vs ARMS-T, and ARMS-T vs FE analyses were 86.7%, 80.7%, and 80.0%, respectively. The neuroanatomical decision functions underlying these discriminative results particularly involved the frontotemporal, cingulate, cerebellar, and subcortical brain structures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that structural brain alterations accumulate at the onset of psychosis and occur even before transition to psychosis allowing for the single-subject differentiation of the prodromal and first-episode stages of the disease. Pattern regression techniques facilitate an accurate prediction of these structural brain dynamics at the early stage of psychosis, potentially allowing for the early recognition of individuals at risk of developing psychosis.

摘要

背景

精神病高危状态(ARMS)和精神病首次发作与大脑结构异常有关,这些异常可能有助于对精神病进行个体化的早期识别。然而,目前尚不清楚这些大脑改变是在高危个体的临床恶化之前发展的,还是与个体向精神病的转变同时发生的。

方法

我们评估了一种基于磁共振成像(MRI)的分类系统在分类有后续精神病发作风险的个体(ARMS-T)和首次发作精神病患者(FE)的疾病阶段的表现。使用 22 名健康对照(HC)、16 名 ARMS-T 和 23 名 FE 受试者的结构 MRI 数据构建了两两和多组生物标志物。这些生物标志物在未见测试病例中的性能通过重复嵌套交叉验证进行测量。

结果

在 HC 与 FE、HC 与 ARMS-T 和 ARMS-T 与 FE 分析中的分类准确率分别为 86.7%、80.7%和 80.0%。这些判别结果的神经解剖决策函数特别涉及额颞叶、扣带回、小脑和皮质下脑结构。

结论

我们的发现表明,大脑结构改变在精神病发作时开始积累,甚至在向精神病转变之前就已经发生,从而允许对疾病的前驱期和首次发作期进行个体区分。模式回归技术有助于在精神病的早期阶段准确预测这些结构大脑动力学,可能允许早期识别有发展为精神病风险的个体。

相似文献

1
Distinguishing prodromal from first-episode psychosis using neuroanatomical single-subject pattern recognition.使用神经解剖学的单个体素模式识别来区分前驱期和首发精神病。
Schizophr Bull. 2013 Sep;39(5):1105-14. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs095. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
2
Disease prediction in the at-risk mental state for psychosis using neuroanatomical biomarkers: results from the FePsy study.使用神经解剖学生物标志物预测精神病高危状态下的疾病:FePsy 研究的结果。
Schizophr Bull. 2012 Nov;38(6):1234-46. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr145. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
3
Use of neuroanatomical pattern classification to identify subjects in at-risk mental states of psychosis and predict disease transition.运用神经解剖学模式分类来识别处于精神病风险心理状态的个体并预测疾病转变。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;66(7):700-12. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.62.
4
Use of neuroanatomical pattern regression to predict the structural brain dynamics of vulnerability and transition to psychosis.使用神经解剖模式回归来预测易感性和向精神病转化的结构大脑动力学。
Schizophr Res. 2010 Nov;123(2-3):175-87. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.08.032. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
5
Prediction of outcome in the psychosis prodrome using neuroanatomical pattern classification.使用神经解剖学模式分类预测精神病前驱期的结局。
Schizophr Res. 2016 Jun;173(3):159-165. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
6
Classifying individuals at high-risk for psychosis based on functional brain activity during working memory processing.基于工作记忆处理过程中的大脑功能活动对精神病高风险个体进行分类。
Neuroimage Clin. 2015 Sep 30;9:555-63. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.09.015. eCollection 2015.
7
Insular volume abnormalities associated with different transition probabilities to psychosis.与不同精神病转化率相关的脑岛体积异常。
Psychol Med. 2012 Aug;42(8):1613-25. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711002716. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
8
Early recognition and disease prediction in the at-risk mental states for psychosis using neurocognitive pattern classification.使用神经认知模式分类对精神病高危精神状态进行早期识别和疾病预测。
Schizophr Bull. 2012 Nov;38(6):1200-15. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr037. Epub 2011 May 16.
9
Brain structure in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis, patients with first-episode schizophrenia, and healthy controls: a VBM study.超高危精神病患者、首发精神分裂症患者及健康对照者的脑结构:一项基于体素的形态学研究
Schizophr Res. 2015 Feb;161(2-3):169-76. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.10.041. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
10
Elucidating a magnetic resonance imaging-based neuroanatomic biomarker for psychosis: classification analysis using probabilistic brain atlas and machine learning algorithms.基于磁共振成像的神经解剖学精神病生物标志物的阐明:使用概率脑图谱和机器学习算法进行分类分析。
Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Dec 1;66(11):1055-60. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.07.019. Epub 2009 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Can artificial intelligence be the future solution to the enormous challenges and suffering caused by Schizophrenia?人工智能能否成为解决精神分裂症所带来的巨大挑战和痛苦的未来方案?
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Feb 28;11(1):32. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00583-4.
2
A meta-analysis and systematic review of single vs. multimodal neuroimaging techniques in the classification of psychosis.一项关于单模态与多模态神经影像学技术在精神分裂症分类中的比较的荟萃分析和系统评价。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;28(8):3278-3292. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02195-9. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
3
Chaos analysis of the cortical boundary for the recognition of psychosis.精神分裂症识别的皮质边界混沌分析。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2023 Apr 25;48(2):E135-E142. doi: 10.1503/jpn.220160. Print 2023 Mar-Apr.
4
Identification of texture MRI brain abnormalities on first-episode psychosis and clinical high-risk subjects using explainable artificial intelligence.利用可解释人工智能识别首发精神病和临床高风险患者的 MRI 脑纹理异常。
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 16;12(1):481. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02242-z.
5
Chaos analysis of the brain topology in first-episode psychosis and clinical high risk patients.首发精神病和临床高危患者脑拓扑结构的混沌分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 13;13:965128. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.965128. eCollection 2022.
6
Predicting brain age during typical and atypical development based on structural and functional neuroimaging.基于结构和功能神经影像学预测典型和非典型发育过程中的大脑年龄。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Dec 15;42(18):5943-5955. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25660. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
7
Schizophrenia: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence Techniques Applied to Detection and Classification.精神分裂症:人工智能技术在检测和分类中的应用调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 5;18(11):6099. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116099.
8
Application of machine learning to predict reduction in total PANSS score and enrich enrollment in schizophrenia clinical trials.机器学习在预测精神分裂症临床试验中总 PANSS 评分降低中的应用及丰富入组。
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep;14(5):1864-1874. doi: 10.1111/cts.13035. Epub 2021 May 3.
9
Support vector machine-based classification of schizophrenia patients and healthy controls using structural magnetic resonance imaging from two independent sites.基于支持向量机的结构性磁共振成像对来自两个独立研究站点的精神分裂症患者和健康对照者的分类。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 24;15(11):e0239615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239615. eCollection 2020.
10
Fractures in the framework: limitations of classification systems in psychiatry
.框架中的骨折:精神病学分类系统的局限性
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020 Mar;22(1):17-26. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.1/rparikh.

本文引用的文献

1
The psychosis high-risk state: a comprehensive state-of-the-art review.精神病高危状态:全面的最新综述。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;70(1):107-20. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.269.
2
Cognitive functioning in prodromal psychosis: a meta-analysis.前驱期精神病的认知功能:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;69(6):562-71. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1592.
3
Third-generation neuroimaging in early schizophrenia: translating research evidence into clinical utility.早期精神分裂症的第三代神经影像学:将研究证据转化为临床应用。
Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;200(4):270-2. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.103234.
4
Predicting psychosis: meta-analysis of transition outcomes in individuals at high clinical risk.预测精神病:对临床高风险个体转变结果的荟萃分析。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;69(3):220-9. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1472.
5
Should attenuated psychosis syndrome be included in DSM-5?亚临床精神病综合征是否应纳入《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)?
Lancet. 2012 Feb 18;379(9816):591-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61507-9.
6
Multivariate pattern classification of gray matter pathology in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症中灰质病理学的多变量模式分类。
Neuroimage. 2012 Mar;60(1):400-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.070. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
7
Disease prediction in the at-risk mental state for psychosis using neuroanatomical biomarkers: results from the FePsy study.使用神经解剖学生物标志物预测精神病高危状态下的疾病:FePsy 研究的结果。
Schizophr Bull. 2012 Nov;38(6):1234-46. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr145. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
8
Neuroanatomical maps of psychosis onset: voxel-wise meta-analysis of antipsychotic-naive VBM studies.神经解剖学图谱的精神病发病:抗精神病药初治 VBM 研究的体素水平荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2012 Nov;38(6):1297-307. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr134. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
9
Association between brain structure and psychometric schizotypy in healthy individuals.健康个体的大脑结构与心理精神分裂症倾向的关联。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;13(7):544-9. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2011.559269. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
10
Gray matters!--mapping the transition to psychosis.灰质的转变!——精神分裂症的发病机制研究。
Schizophr Res. 2011 Dec;133(1-3):63-7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.08.021. Epub 2011 Sep 22.