• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习在预测精神分裂症临床试验中总 PANSS 评分降低中的应用及丰富入组。

Application of machine learning to predict reduction in total PANSS score and enrich enrollment in schizophrenia clinical trials.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep;14(5):1864-1874. doi: 10.1111/cts.13035. Epub 2021 May 3.

DOI:10.1111/cts.13035
PMID:33939284
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8504834/
Abstract

Clinical trial efficiency, defined as facilitating patient enrollment, and reducing the time to reach safety and efficacy decision points, is a critical driving factor for making improvements in therapeutic development. The present work evaluated a machine learning (ML) approach to improve phase II or proof-of-concept trials designed to address unmet medical needs in treating schizophrenia. Diagnostic data from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) trial were used to develop a binary classification ML model predicting individual patient response as either "improvement," defined as greater than 20% reduction in total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score, or "no improvement," defined as an inadequate treatment response (<20% reduction in total PANSS). A random forest algorithm performed best relative to other tree-based approaches in model ability to classify patients after 6 months of treatment. Although model ability to identify true positives, a measure of model sensitivity, was poor (<0.2), its specificity, true negative rate, was high (0.948). A second model, adapted from the first, was subsequently applied as a proof-of-concept for the ML approach to supplement trial enrollment by identifying patients not expected to improve based on their baseline diagnostic scores. In three virtual trials applying this screening approach, the percentage of patients predicted to improve ranged from 46% to 48%, consistently approximately double the CATIE response rate of 22%. These results show the promising application of ML to improve clinical trial efficiency and, as such, ML models merit further consideration and development.

摘要

临床试验效率,定义为促进患者入组,以及减少达到安全性和疗效决策点的时间,是改善治疗开发的关键驱动因素。本研究评估了一种机器学习(ML)方法,以改进旨在治疗精神分裂症中未满足医疗需求的 II 期或概念验证试验。使用来自临床抗精神病药物干预疗效试验(CATIE)的诊断数据来开发一个二进制分类 ML 模型,预测个体患者的反应是“改善”,定义为总阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)评分降低 20%以上,还是“无改善”,定义为治疗反应不足(总 PANSS 评分降低<20%)。随机森林算法在模型对治疗 6 个月后的患者进行分类的能力方面相对于其他基于树的方法表现最佳。尽管模型识别真阳性(衡量模型敏感性的指标)的能力较差(<0.2),但其特异性、真阴性率很高(0.948)。随后,基于第一个模型改编的第二个模型被应用为 ML 方法的概念验证,通过根据基线诊断评分识别预计不会改善的患者来补充试验入组。在三个应用这种筛选方法的虚拟试验中,预计会改善的患者比例从 46%到 48%不等,始终约为 CATIE 反应率 22%的两倍。这些结果表明,ML 在提高临床试验效率方面具有广阔的应用前景,因此 ML 模型值得进一步考虑和开发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee54/8504834/c19971d1f230/CTS-14-1864-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee54/8504834/7ac4bd499eea/CTS-14-1864-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee54/8504834/dd34ff63cc18/CTS-14-1864-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee54/8504834/8defe2858e52/CTS-14-1864-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee54/8504834/c19971d1f230/CTS-14-1864-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee54/8504834/7ac4bd499eea/CTS-14-1864-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee54/8504834/dd34ff63cc18/CTS-14-1864-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee54/8504834/8defe2858e52/CTS-14-1864-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee54/8504834/c19971d1f230/CTS-14-1864-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of machine learning to predict reduction in total PANSS score and enrich enrollment in schizophrenia clinical trials.机器学习在预测精神分裂症临床试验中总 PANSS 评分降低中的应用及丰富入组。
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep;14(5):1864-1874. doi: 10.1111/cts.13035. Epub 2021 May 3.
2
Characterization of specific and distinct patient types in clinical trials of acute schizophrenia using an uncorrelated PANSS score matrix transform (UPSM).使用非相关 PANSS 评分矩阵变换 (UPSM) 对急性精神分裂症临床试验中的特定和不同患者类型进行特征描述。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Dec;294:113569. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113569. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
3
Randomised controlled trials of conventional antipsychotic versus new atypical drugs, and new atypical drugs versus clozapine, in people with schizophrenia responding poorly to, or intolerant of, current drug treatment.针对对当前药物治疗反应不佳或不耐受的精神分裂症患者,开展传统抗精神病药物与新型非典型药物对比,以及新型非典型药物与氯氮平对比的随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 May;10(17):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-165. doi: 10.3310/hta10170.
4
Modelling and simulation of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) time course and dropout hazard in placebo arms of schizophrenia clinical trials.精神分裂症临床试验安慰剂组阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)时间进程和脱落风险的建模与模拟。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012 Apr 1;51(4):261-75. doi: 10.2165/11598460-000000000-00000.
5
Efficacy of cariprazine across symptom domains in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia: Pooled analyses from 3 phase II/III studies.卡利拉嗪在精神分裂症急性加重期患者多个症状领域的疗效:来自 3 项 2/3 期研究的汇总分析。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Jan;29(1):127-136. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
6
Association of End Point Definition and Randomized Clinical Trial Duration in Clinical Trials of Schizophrenia Medications.精神分裂症药物临床试验中终点定义与随机临床试验持续时间的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 1;77(10):1064-1071. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1596.
7
Efficacy of iloperidone in the short-term treatment of schizophrenia: a post hoc analysis of pooled patient data from four phase III, placebo- and active-controlled trials.伊潘立酮在精神分裂症短期治疗中的疗效:来自四项III期、安慰剂对照和活性对照试验的汇总患者数据的事后分析
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2012 Jan;27(1):24-32. doi: 10.1002/hup.1254. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
8
Minimum clinically important difference in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale with data from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE).阳性与阴性症状量表的最小临床重要差异:来自干预有效性的临床抗精神病药物试验(CATIE)的数据。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;73(4):526-32. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07162.
9
Placebo effects in adult and adolescent patients with schizophrenia: combined analysis of nine RCTs.成人和青少年精神分裂症患者的安慰剂效应:9 项 RCT 的联合分析。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2019 Feb;139(2):108-116. doi: 10.1111/acps.12960. Epub 2018 Sep 9.
10
Does early improvement predict response to the fast-dissociating D₂ receptor antagonist JNJ-37822681 in patients with acute schizophrenia?早期改善是否能预测急性精神分裂症患者对快速解离的 D₂ 受体拮抗剂 JNJ-37822681 的反应?
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Sep;23(9):1043-50. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.08.017. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing treatment response prediction in first-episode psychosis: integrating clinical and electroencephalography features.推进首发精神病治疗反应预测:整合临床和脑电图特征
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Apr;79(4):187-196. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13791. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
2
Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Psychotic Disorders Using Artificial Intelligence Methods: A Scoping Review.使用人工智能方法预测精神障碍的临床结局:一项范围综述。
Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 29;14(9):878. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14090878.
3
Artificial intelligence for optimizing recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic Utility of Multivariate Morphometry in Schizophrenia.多变量形态测量学在精神分裂症中的预后效用
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 15;10:245. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00245. eCollection 2019.
2
Linking PANSS negative symptom scores with the Clinical Global Impressions Scale: understanding negative symptom scores in schizophrenia.将 PANSS 阴性症状评分与临床总体印象量表相联系:理解精神分裂症中的阴性症状评分。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Aug;44(9):1589-1596. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0363-2. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
3
Trajectories and changes in individual items of positive and negative syndrome scale among schizophrenia patients prior to impending relapse.
人工智能在临床试验中优化招募和保留的应用:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Nov 1;31(11):2749-2759. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae243.
4
An explainable machine learning-based phenomapping strategy for adaptive predictive enrichment in randomized clinical trials.一种基于可解释机器学习的表型映射策略,用于随机临床试验中的适应性预测富集。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Nov 25;6(1):217. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00963-z.
5
Machine learning methods to predict outcomes of pharmacological treatment in psychosis.机器学习方法预测精神病药物治疗结局。
Transl Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 2;13(1):75. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02371-z.
6
The MPRINT Hub Data, Model, Knowledge and Research Coordination Center: Bridging the gap in maternal-pediatric therapeutics research through data integration and pharmacometrics.MPRINT 中心数据、模型、知识和研究协调中心:通过数据集成和药物动力学研究弥合母婴治疗学研究的差距。
Pharmacotherapy. 2023 May;43(5):391-402. doi: 10.1002/phar.2765. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
精神分裂症患者复发前阳性和阴性症状量表各项目的轨迹及变化
NPJ Schizophr. 2018 Jun 20;4(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s41537-018-0056-6.
4
Treatment response prediction and individualized identification of first-episode drug-naïve schizophrenia using brain functional connectivity.基于脑功能连接预测首发未用药精神分裂症的治疗反应和个体化识别。
Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;25(4):906-913. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0106-5. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
5
Bundling arrows: improving translational CNS drug development by integrated PK/PD-metabolomics.捆绑箭头:通过整合 PK/PD-代谢组学提高中枢神经系统药物转化研究。
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2018 Jun;13(6):539-550. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2018.1446935. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
6
Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and report them.临床试验中的适应性设计:为何使用它们,以及如何实施和报告它们。
BMC Med. 2018 Feb 28;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1017-7.
7
Item Response Theory to Quantify Longitudinal Placebo and Paliperidone Effects on PANSS Scores in Schizophrenia.运用项目反应理论量化纵向安慰剂和帕利哌酮对精神分裂症患者阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)评分的影响。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2017 Aug;6(8):543-551. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12207. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
8
The Economic Burden of Schizophrenia in the United States in 2013.2013年美国精神分裂症的经济负担
J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;77(6):764-71. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10278.
9
Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs.制药行业的创新:研发成本的新估计
J Health Econ. 2016 May;47:20-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
10
Structural and Functional Brain Abnormalities in Schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者大脑的结构和功能异常
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010 Aug;19(4):226-231. doi: 10.1177/0963721410377601.