Suppr超能文献

提高车站楼梯攀爬率的提示:信息复杂性的影响。

Prompts to increase stair climbing in stations: the effect of message complexity.

机构信息

Dept of Primary Care Clinical Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2012 Sep;9(7):954-61. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.7.954.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: While point-of-choice prompts consistently increase stair climbing, experimental comparisons of message content are rare. Here, the effects of 2 messages differing in complexity about the health outcomes obtainable from stair climbing were compared.

METHODS

In a UK train station with 2 independent platforms exited by identical 39-step staircases and adjacent escalators, observers recorded travelers ascent method and gender from 8:00 A.M. to 10:00 A.M. on 2 weekdays during February/March 2008 (n = 48,697). Baseline observations (2-weeks) preceded a 3-week poster phase. Two posters (594 × 841 mm) that differed in the complexity of the message were positioned at the point-of-choice between ascent methods, with 1 placed on each side of the station simultaneously. Logistic regression analysis was conducted in April 2010.

RESULTS

Omnibus analysis contained main effects of the intervention (OR = 1.07, CI = 1.02-1.13, P = .01) and pedestrian traffic volume (OR = 5.42, CI = 3.05-9.62, P < .001). Similar effects occurred for complex (OR = 1.10, CI = 1.02-1.18, P = .01) and simple messages (OR = 1.07, CI = 1.01-1.13, P = .02) when analyses controlled for the influence of pedestrian traffic volume. There was reduced efficacy for the complex message during busier periods (OR = 0.36, CI = 0.20-0.66, P = .001), whereas the simple message was immune to these effects of traffic volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Pedestrian traffic flow in stations can influence message effectiveness. Simple messages appear more suitable for busy sites.

摘要

背景/目的:虽然选择点提示始终可以增加爬楼梯的次数,但关于消息内容的实验比较却很少。在这里,比较了关于爬楼梯可获得的健康结果的 2 条消息,这两条消息在复杂程度上有所不同。

方法

在英国的一个火车站,有 2 个独立的站台,出口处都有相同的 39 级楼梯和相邻的自动扶梯,观察者从 2008 年 2 月/ 3 月的每周一至周五上午 8 点到 10 点,在 8 个不同的时间段记录乘客的上升方法和性别(n = 48697)。在海报阶段的 3 周之前,先进行了 2 周的基线观察。在上升方法的选择点处,放置了 2 个大小不同的海报(594 × 841 毫米),海报的信息复杂程度不同,每个站台的一侧各放置一个,同时放置。2010 年 4 月进行了逻辑回归分析。

结果

总体分析包含了干预措施的主要效果(OR = 1.07,CI = 1.02-1.13,P =.01)和行人交通量的主要效果(OR = 5.42,CI = 3.05-9.62,P <.001)。对于复杂(OR = 1.10,CI = 1.02-1.18,P =.01)和简单消息(OR = 1.07,CI = 1.01-1.13,P =.02),当分析控制行人交通量的影响时,也出现了类似的效果。在繁忙时段,复杂消息的效果降低(OR = 0.36,CI = 0.20-0.66,P =.001),而简单消息则不受这些交通量的影响。

结论

车站内的行人流量会影响消息的有效性。简单的消息似乎更适合繁忙的场所。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验