Leach Matthew J, Moore Vivienne
School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD007244. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007244.pub2.
Menopause can be a distressing and disruptive time for many women, with many experiencing hot flushes, night sweats, vaginal atrophy and dryness. Postmenopausal women are also at increased risk of osteoporosis. Interventions that decrease the severity and frequency of these menopausal symptoms are likely to improve a woman's well-being and quality of life. Hormone therapy has been shown to be effective in controlling the symptoms of menopause; however, many potentially serious adverse effects have been associated with this treatment. Evidence from experimental studies suggests that black cohosh may be a biologically plausible alternative treatment for menopause; even so, findings from studies investigating the clinical effectiveness of black cohosh have, to date, been inconsistent.
To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of black cohosh (Cimicifuga racemosa or Actaea racemosa) for treating menopausal symptoms in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Relevant studies were identified through AARP Ageline, AMED, AMI, BioMed Central gateway, CAM on PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Health Source Nursing/Academic edition, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, MEDLINE, Natural medicines comprehensive database, PsycINFO, TRIP database, clinical trial registers and the reference lists of included trials; up to March 2012. Content experts and manufacturers of black cohosh extracts were also contacted.
All randomised controlled trials comparing orally administered monopreparations of black cohosh to placebo or active medication in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Two review authors independently selected trials, extracted data and completed the 'Risk of bias' assessment. Study authors were contacted for missing information.
Sixteen randomised controlled trials, recruiting a total of 2027 perimenopausal or postmenopausal women, were identified. All studies used oral monopreparations of black cohosh at a median daily dose of 40 mg, for a mean duration of 23 weeks. Comparator interventions included placebo, hormone therapy, red clover and fluoxetine. Reported outcomes included vasomotor symptoms, vulvovaginal symptoms, menopausal symptom scores and adverse effects. There was no significant difference between black cohosh and placebo in the frequency of hot flushes (mean difference (MD) 0.07 flushes per day; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.43 to 0.56 flushes per day; P=0.79; 393 women; three trials; moderate heterogeneity: I(2) = 47%) or in menopausal symptom scores (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.10; 95% CI -0.32 to 0.11; P = 0.34; 357 women; four trials; low heterogeneity: I(2) = 21%). Compared to black cohosh, hormone therapy significantly reduced daily hot flush frequency (three trials; data not pooled) and menopausal symptom scores (SMD 0.32; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.51; P=0.0009; 468 women; five trials; substantial heterogeneity: I(2) = 69%). These findings should be interpreted with caution given the heterogeneity between studies. Comparisons of the effectiveness of black cohosh and other interventions were either inconclusive (because of considerable heterogeneity or an insufficient number of studies) or not statistically significant. Similarly, evidence on the safety of black cohosh was inconclusive, owing to poor reporting. There were insufficient data to pool results for health-related quality of life, sexuality, bone health, vulvovaginal atrophic symptoms and night sweats. No trials reported cost-effectiveness data. The quality of included trials was generally unclear, owing to inadequate reporting.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence to support the use of black cohosh for menopausal symptoms. However, there is adequate justification for conducting further studies in this area. The uncertain quality of identified trials highlights the need for improved reporting of study methods, particularly with regards to allocation concealment and the handling of incomplete outcome data. The effect of black cohosh on other important outcomes, such as health-related quality of life, sexuality, bone health, night sweats and cost-effectiveness also warrants further investigation.
对许多女性而言,更年期可能是一段令人苦恼且生活受到干扰的时期,很多人会经历潮热、盗汗、阴道萎缩和干涩。绝经后女性患骨质疏松症的风险也会增加。减轻这些更年期症状的严重程度和发作频率的干预措施可能会改善女性的健康状况和生活质量。激素疗法已被证明对控制更年期症状有效;然而,这种治疗与许多潜在的严重不良反应相关。实验研究的证据表明,黑升麻可能是一种生物学上合理的更年期替代治疗方法;即便如此,迄今为止,调查黑升麻临床疗效的研究结果并不一致。
评估黑升麻(升麻属植物或美类叶升麻)治疗围绝经期和绝经后女性更年期症状的临床疗效和安全性。
通过美国退休人员协会老年信息数据库、联合和补充医学数据库、澳大利亚医疗索引、生物医学中心网关、PubMed上的补充和替代医学、护理学与健康领域数据库、考克兰系统评价数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、健康源护理/学术版、国际药学文摘、医学索引、天然药物综合数据库、心理学文摘、循证医学数据库、临床试验注册库以及纳入试验的参考文献列表来识别相关研究;截至2012年3月。还联系了黑升麻提取物方面的内容专家和制造商。
所有比较口服黑升麻单一制剂与安慰剂或活性药物治疗围绝经期和绝经后女性的随机对照试验。
两位综述作者独立选择试验、提取数据并完成“偏倚风险”评估。就缺失信息与研究作者进行了联系。
共识别出16项随机对照试验,招募了总计2027名围绝经期或绝经后女性。所有研究均使用口服黑升麻单一制剂,中位日剂量为40毫克,平均疗程为23周。对照干预措施包括安慰剂、激素疗法、红三叶草和氟西汀。报告的结局包括血管舒缩症状、外阴阴道症状、更年期症状评分和不良反应。黑升麻与安慰剂在潮热发作频率上无显著差异(平均差(MD)为每天0.07次潮热;95%置信区间(CI)为每天-0.43至0.56次潮热;P = 0.79;393名女性;3项试验;中度异质性:I² = 47%),在更年期症状评分方面也无显著差异(标准化平均差(SMD)为-0.10;95%CI为-0.32至0.11;P = 0.34;357名女性;4项试验;低异质性:I² = 21%)。与黑升麻相比,激素疗法显著降低了每日潮热发作频率(3项试验;未合并数据)和更年期症状评分(SMD为0.32;95%CI为0.13至0.51;P = 0.0009;468名女性;5项试验;高度异质性:I² = 69%)。鉴于研究之间的异质性,这些结果应谨慎解读。黑升麻与其他干预措施有效性的比较要么无定论(由于异质性相当大或研究数量不足),要么无统计学意义。同样,关于黑升麻安全性的证据也无定论,原因是报告情况不佳。没有足够的数据来汇总与健康相关的生活质量、性功能、骨骼健康、外阴阴道萎缩症状和盗汗方面的结果。没有试验报告成本效益数据。由于报告不充分,纳入试验的质量总体不明确。
目前没有足够的证据支持使用黑升麻治疗更年期症状。然而,有充分的理由在该领域开展进一步研究。已识别试验质量的不确定性凸显了改进研究方法报告的必要性,特别是在分配隐藏和不完整结局数据处理方面。黑升麻对其他重要结局的影响,如与健康相关的生活质量、性功能、骨骼健康、盗汗和成本效益,也值得进一步研究。