Department of Child and Family Studies, College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, 13301 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., MHC 2113A, Tampa, FL 33612-3807, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 May;43(5):1005-16. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1646-1.
This study was conducted to examine the feasibility and potential efficacy of implementing an adapted, family-centered version of the school-based prevent-teach-reinforce (PTR) model. The research included two families who implemented the PTR process for their children in collaboration with the researchers. The adapted PTR was tested using a multiple baseline design across routines to examine changes in child behavior across experimental conditions. Results indicated that the adapted PTR intervention was associated with reduction in child problem behavior and increases in alternative behavior in both target and non-target routines. The results also indicated that the parents were able to implement the behavior intervention plan with fidelity and successfully use the PTR process for a novel routine. The PTR intervention also had high social validity ratings; both self- and novel-rated validity indicated that the PTR intervention was acceptable to both families and the community at large. The data are discussed in terms of the expanding evidence related to the PTR model and the extension to a family context.
本研究旨在考察实施基于学校的预防-教导-强化(PTR)模式改编版的可行性和潜在效果,该模式以家庭为中心。研究包括两个家庭,他们与研究人员合作,共同为孩子实施 PTR 过程。适应性 PTR 使用跨常规的多项基线设计进行测试,以检查实验条件下儿童行为的变化。结果表明,适应性 PTR 干预与儿童问题行为的减少和目标及非目标常规中替代行为的增加有关。结果还表明,父母能够忠实地实施行为干预计划,并成功地将 PTR 过程用于新常规。PTR 干预也具有很高的社会有效性评分;自我和新颖的有效性评分均表明,PTR 干预被两个家庭和整个社区所接受。该数据是根据与 PTR 模型相关的扩展证据以及向家庭环境的扩展进行讨论的。