King's College London, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, UK.
Psychol Med. 2013 Jun;43(6):1323-33. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712002061. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
Increased reaction time variability (RTV) on cognitive tasks requiring a speeded response is characteristic of several psychiatric disorders. In attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the association with RTV is strong phenotypically and genetically, yet high RTV is not a stable impairment but shows ADHD-sensitive improvement under certain conditions, such as those with rewards. The state regulation theory proposed that the RTV difference score, which captures change from baseline to a rewarded or fast condition, specifically measures 'state regulation'. By contrast, the interpretation of RTV baseline (slow, unrewarded) scores is debated. We aimed to investigate directly the degree of phenotypic and etiological overlap between RTV baseline and RTV difference scores. Method We conducted genetic model fitting analyses on go/no-go and fast task RTV data, across task conditions manipulating rewards and event rate, from a population-based twin sample (n=1314) and an ADHD and control sibling-pair sample (n=1265).
Phenotypic and genetic/familial correlations were consistently high (0.72-0.98) between RTV baseline and difference scores, across tasks, manipulations and samples. By contrast, correlations were low between RTV in the manipulated condition and difference scores. A comparison across two different go/no-go task RTV difference scores (slow-fast/slow-incentive) showed high phenotypic and genetic/familial overlap (r = 0.75-0.83).
Our finding that RTV difference scores measure largely the same etiological process as RTV under baseline condition supports theories emphasizing the malleability of the observed high RTV. Given the statistical shortcomings of difference scores, we recommend the use of RTV baseline scores for most analyses, including genetic analyses.
在需要快速反应的认知任务中,反应时变异性(RTV)的增加是几种精神障碍的特征。在注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)中,与 RTV 的关联在表型和遗传上都很强,但高 RTV 不是一种稳定的损伤,而是在某些条件下,如奖励条件下,会出现 ADHD 敏感的改善。状态调节理论提出,捕捉从基线到奖励或快速条件变化的 RTV 差值分数,专门衡量“状态调节”。相比之下,RTV 基线(缓慢、无奖励)分数的解释存在争议。我们旨在直接研究 RTV 基线和 RTV 差值分数之间的表型和病因重叠程度。
我们对基于人群的双胞胎样本(n=1314)和 ADHD 及对照组同胞对样本(n=1265)的 Go/No-Go 和快速任务 RTV 数据进行了遗传模型拟合分析,这些数据跨越了奖励和事件率操纵的任务条件。
在不同的任务、操纵和样本中,RTV 基线和差值分数之间的表型和遗传/家庭相关性始终很高(0.72-0.98)。相比之下,操纵条件下的 RTV 与差值分数之间的相关性较低。对两种不同的 Go/No-Go 任务 RTV 差值分数(慢-快/慢-奖励)的比较显示,表型和遗传/家庭相关性很高(r=0.75-0.83)。
我们发现 RTV 差值分数在很大程度上测量了与基线条件下 RTV 相同的病因过程,这支持了强调观察到的高 RTV 可变性的理论。鉴于差值分数的统计缺陷,我们建议在大多数分析中使用 RTV 基线分数,包括遗传分析。