• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童参与和享受评估(CAPE)及儿童活动偏好(PAC)希腊语版的结构效度验证。

Construct validation of the Greek version of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC).

机构信息

Physical Education and Sport Sciences Dept, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thermi, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2013 May;10(4):523-32. doi: 10.1123/jpah.10.4.523. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1123/jpah.10.4.523
PMID:22977221
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and the Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC) are 2 measures of children's participation in various activities. The purpose of this study was the validation of the Greek version of "CAPE & PAC."

METHODS

The questionnaires were translated and pilot tested on a sample of 25 individuals. The reliability and validity of the questionnaires were tested on 302 individuals (253 typical population, 49 disabled), 6-21 years of age. The construct validity of the instruments was examined the directional hypothesis by comparing known groups with existing differences. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to determine the validity of the typology of activities. The reliability was examined by checking the internal consistency of the instruments.

RESULTS

The comparison between divergent groups confirmed the predicted differences of the mean scores and the validity of the instruments. Seven factors (categories of activities) emerged from the factor analysis. The acceptable range of Cronbach alpha for the PAC scale indicated high consistency.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that partially support the validity and reliability of "CAPE & PAC" instruments to use in Greek population. Further investigation is recommended for both clinical and research purposes.

摘要

背景

儿童参与和享受评估(CAPE)和儿童活动偏好(PAC)是衡量儿童参与各种活动的两种方法。本研究的目的是验证希腊语版“CAPE & PAC”。

方法

问卷经过翻译和小样本测试(25 人)。对 302 名个体(253 名典型人群,49 名残疾人群)进行了问卷的信度和效度测试,年龄为 6-21 岁。通过比较具有现有差异的已知群体,检验了工具的结构效度。通过确定活动类型的有效性进行了探索性因素分析。通过检查仪器的内部一致性来检验可靠性。

结果

在不同群体之间的比较证实了平均分数的预测差异和仪器的有效性。从因素分析中出现了七个因素(活动类别)。PAC 量表的可接受 Cronbach alpha 范围表明具有较高的一致性。

结论

本研究提供的证据部分支持在希腊人群中使用“CAPE & PAC”工具的有效性和可靠性。建议进一步研究其在临床和研究中的应用。

相似文献

1
Construct validation of the Greek version of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC).儿童参与和享受评估(CAPE)及儿童活动偏好(PAC)希腊语版的结构效度验证。
J Phys Act Health. 2013 May;10(4):523-32. doi: 10.1123/jpah.10.4.523. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
2
Reliability of the Norwegian version of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC).挪威版儿童参与和享受评估(CAPE)及儿童活动偏好(PAC)的信度。
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2013 May;33(2):199-212. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2012.739269. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
3
Measuring children's participation in recreation and leisure activities: construct validation of the CAPE and PAC.测量儿童参与娱乐和休闲活动的情况:儿童活动参与量表(CAPE)和家长活动参与量表(PAC)的结构效度验证
Child Care Health Dev. 2007 Jan;33(1):28-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00613.x.
4
Cultural adaptation and construct validation of the Arabic version of children's assessment of participation and enjoyment and preferences for activities of children measures.儿童参与和活动喜好评估及偏好测量的阿拉伯文版的文化适应性和结构验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Apr;41(8):958-965. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1416498. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
5
Cultural validity of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment/Preferences for Activities of Children (CAPE/PAC).儿童参与和享受评估/儿童活动偏好量表(CAPE/PAC)的文化效度
Scand J Occup Ther. 2012 Sep;19(5):428-38. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2011.631218. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
6
Reliability of the German version of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC).《儿童参与和享受评估量表》(CAPE)德文版及《儿童活动偏好量表》(PAC)的信效度
Child Care Health Dev. 2016 Sep;42(5):683-91. doi: 10.1111/cch.12360. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
7
The convergent validity of the Children's Leisure Assessment Scale (CLASS) and Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment and Preferences for Activities of Children (CAPE/PAC).儿童休闲评估量表(CLASS)与儿童参与和享受评估及儿童活动偏好量表(CAPE/PAC)的收敛效度。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2020 Jul;27(5):349-363. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2019.1672784. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
8
Review of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment and the Preferences for Activity of Children.
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2008;28(4):389-404. doi: 10.1080/01942630802307135.
9
Cross-cultural validation of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) in Spain.《儿童参与和快乐评估量表(CAPE)》在西班牙的跨文化验证
Child Care Health Dev. 2014 Mar;40(2):231-41. doi: 10.1111/cch.12012. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
10
Are children's psychological self-concepts predictive of their self reported activity preferences and leisure participation?儿童的心理自我概念能否预测他们自我报告的活动偏好和休闲参与情况?
Aust Occup Ther J. 2014 Jun;61(3):177-86. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12101. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Sport and Physical Recreation Participation for Children and Youth with Disabilities: A Systematic Review.残疾儿童和青少年参与体育和身体娱乐活动的评估:一项系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 3;22(4):557. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040557.
2
Functional activity and communication-social ability of youths with developmental disabilities: a qualitative study.发育障碍青年的功能活动与沟通社交能力:一项定性研究
J Phys Ther Sci. 2022 Nov;34(11):745-751. doi: 10.1589/jpts.34.745. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
3
Cross-Cultural Validation of Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment Portuguese Version.
儿童参与和享受评估葡萄牙语版本的跨文化验证
Front Pediatr. 2019 Feb 12;7:33. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00033. eCollection 2019.
4
Measurement properties of questionnaires assessing participation in children and adolescents with a disability: a systematic review.评估残疾儿童和青少年参与度问卷的测量属性:一项系统综述
Qual Life Res. 2014 Dec;23(10):2793-808. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0743-3. Epub 2014 Jun 27.