• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《儿童参与和享受评估量表》(CAPE)德文版及《儿童活动偏好量表》(PAC)的信效度

Reliability of the German version of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC).

作者信息

Fink A, Gebhard B, Erdwiens S, Haddenhorst L, Nowak S

机构信息

Institute of Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Nordhausen, Nordhausen, Germany.

出版信息

Child Care Health Dev. 2016 Sep;42(5):683-91. doi: 10.1111/cch.12360. Epub 2016 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1111/cch.12360
PMID:27273161
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The introduction of the International Classification of Functioning, Disabilities and Health of the World Health Organization in 2001 made social participation a major rehabilitation outcome and the ultimate goal of rehabilitation services. There is no available instrument to measure the youth participation in leisure activities apart from asking the youth themselves. The goal of this study was to present a German version of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment and Preferences for Activities of Children (CAPE/PAC).

METHODS

The CAPE/PAC questionnaire was translated into German, a cultural adaptation process was designed and a reliability study was conducted. One hundred and fifty-two youths with and without disabilities, with a mean age of 15.2 years (standard deviation 1.7), participated in the study. The participants completed CAPE and PAC twice within 4 weeks. Reliability was examined by intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement, smallest detectable change and Cronbach's alpha.

RESULTS

The absolute values of participation differ between the typically developed youth group and those with impairments; the reliability of the CAPE/PAC is comparable in both groups. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.43 to 0.74 for the CAPE and from 0.71 to 0.83 for the PAC in all participants. The alpha values for internal consistency ranged from 0.42 to 0.82 for the CAPE and from 0.65 to 0.92 for the PAC.

CONCLUSIONS

The German version of the PAC showed satisfactory reliability; however, reliability was not satisfactory for all scores of the CAPE, but comparable with versions in other languages. The need for newly developed participation measurements requires further discussion.

摘要

背景

2001年世界卫生组织《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的推出,使社会参与成为主要的康复成果以及康复服务的最终目标。除了询问青少年自身外,目前尚无可用的工具来衡量青少年参与休闲活动的情况。本研究的目的是呈现《儿童参与和享受评估及儿童活动偏好量表》(CAPE/PAC)的德语版本。

方法

将CAPE/PAC问卷翻译成德语,设计了文化适应过程并进行了信度研究。152名有或无残疾的青少年参与了该研究,平均年龄为15.2岁(标准差1.7)。参与者在4周内分两次完成CAPE和PAC。通过组内相关系数、测量标准误差、最小可检测变化和克朗巴哈系数来检验信度。

结果

发育正常的青少年组和有损伤的青少年组之间的参与绝对值有所不同;CAPE/PAC在两组中的信度相当。所有参与者中,CAPE的组内相关系数范围为0.43至0.74,PAC的组内相关系数范围为0.71至0.83。CAPE的内部一致性α值范围为0.42至0.82,PAC的内部一致性α值范围为0.65至0.92。

结论

PAC的德语版本显示出令人满意的信度;然而,CAPE的所有得分的信度并不令人满意,但与其他语言版本相当。对新开发的参与度测量工具的需求需要进一步讨论。

相似文献

1
Reliability of the German version of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC).《儿童参与和享受评估量表》(CAPE)德文版及《儿童活动偏好量表》(PAC)的信效度
Child Care Health Dev. 2016 Sep;42(5):683-91. doi: 10.1111/cch.12360. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
2
Reliability of the Norwegian version of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC).挪威版儿童参与和享受评估(CAPE)及儿童活动偏好(PAC)的信度。
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2013 May;33(2):199-212. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2012.739269. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
3
Cultural adaptation and construct validation of the Arabic version of children's assessment of participation and enjoyment and preferences for activities of children measures.儿童参与和活动喜好评估及偏好测量的阿拉伯文版的文化适应性和结构验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Apr;41(8):958-965. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1416498. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
4
The convergent validity of the Children's Leisure Assessment Scale (CLASS) and Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment and Preferences for Activities of Children (CAPE/PAC).儿童休闲评估量表(CLASS)与儿童参与和享受评估及儿童活动偏好量表(CAPE/PAC)的收敛效度。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2020 Jul;27(5):349-363. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2019.1672784. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
5
Comparative content review of children's participation measures using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Children and Youth.使用《国际功能、残疾和健康分类-儿童和青少年》对儿童参与措施进行比较内容审查。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):141-52. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.027. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
6
Cross-cultural validation of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) in Spain.《儿童参与和快乐评估量表(CAPE)》在西班牙的跨文化验证
Child Care Health Dev. 2014 Mar;40(2):231-41. doi: 10.1111/cch.12012. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
7
Are children's psychological self-concepts predictive of their self reported activity preferences and leisure participation?儿童的心理自我概念能否预测他们自我报告的活动偏好和休闲参与情况?
Aust Occup Ther J. 2014 Jun;61(3):177-86. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12101. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
8
Construct validation of the Greek version of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC).儿童参与和享受评估(CAPE)及儿童活动偏好(PAC)希腊语版的结构效度验证。
J Phys Act Health. 2013 May;10(4):523-32. doi: 10.1123/jpah.10.4.523. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
9
Cultural validity of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment/Preferences for Activities of Children (CAPE/PAC).儿童参与和享受评估/儿童活动偏好量表(CAPE/PAC)的文化效度
Scand J Occup Ther. 2012 Sep;19(5):428-38. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2011.631218. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
10
Stability of leisure participation from school-age to adolescence in individuals with cerebral palsy.脑瘫患者从学龄期到青春期休闲参与的稳定性。
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Dec;47:73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.08.009. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Sport and Physical Recreation Participation for Children and Youth with Disabilities: A Systematic Review.残疾儿童和青少年参与体育和身体娱乐活动的评估:一项系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 3;22(4):557. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040557.
2
What does social participation mean? A qualitative study exploring the concept of participation from the perspectives of experts and parents.社会参与是什么意思?一项从专家和家长角度探索参与概念的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):e072684. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072684.
3
The Participation of Children with Intellectual Disabilities: Including the Voices of Children and Their Caregivers in India and South Africa.
智力残疾儿童的参与:包括印度和南非儿童及其照顾者的声音。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 15;17(18):6706. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186706.
4
A Strength-Based Intervention to Increase Participation in Leisure Activities in Children with Neuropsychiatric Disabilities: A Pilot Study.一项基于优势的干预措施以提高神经精神残疾儿童参与休闲活动的程度:一项试点研究。
Occup Ther Int. 2020 Apr 2;2020:1358707. doi: 10.1155/2020/1358707. eCollection 2020.
5
Cross-Cultural Validation of Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment Portuguese Version.儿童参与和享受评估葡萄牙语版本的跨文化验证
Front Pediatr. 2019 Feb 12;7:33. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00033. eCollection 2019.
6
Development and psychometric testing of an instrument for measuring social participation of adolescents: study protocol of a prospective mixed-methods study.青少年社会参与度测量工具的研制与心理测量学检验:一项前瞻性混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 24;9(2):e028529. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028529.