• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

旁观者认知:对大学性侵犯预防项目的影响。

Bystander perceptions: implications for university sexual assault prevention programs.

作者信息

Koelsch Lori E, Brown Amy L, Boisen Leah

机构信息

Psychology Department, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15282, USA.

出版信息

Violence Vict. 2012;27(4):563-79. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.27.4.563.

DOI:10.1891/0886-6708.27.4.563
PMID:22978075
Abstract

The college party environment comprises a risk factor for unwanted sexual activity but may also provide a safety net, given the presence of bystanders who can potentially intervene in risky situations. Sexual assault prevention programs are increasingly incorporating bystander education into their designs. This article presents findings intended to inform these programs. Qualitative data from single-sex focus groups about typical college party behavior was analyzed for common themes. Analysis of these themes suggests that although some sexual behavior is visible at college parties, most sexual behavior is assumed to occur behind closed doors. In addition, intervention and prevention methods may vary by gender. Multiple factors appear to promote or dissuade bystander intervention in college party situations.

摘要

大学派对环境构成了意外性行为的一个风险因素,但鉴于可能在危险情况下进行干预的旁观者的存在,它也可能提供一个安全保障。性侵犯预防项目越来越多地将旁观者教育纳入其设计之中。本文呈现的研究结果旨在为这些项目提供信息。对来自关于典型大学派对行为的单性别焦点小组的定性数据进行了分析,以找出共同主题。对这些主题的分析表明,虽然在大学派对上有些性行为是可见的,但大多数性行为被认为是在紧闭的门后发生的。此外,干预和预防方法可能因性别而异。在大学派对场景中,多种因素似乎会促进或阻碍旁观者进行干预。

相似文献

1
Bystander perceptions: implications for university sexual assault prevention programs.旁观者认知:对大学性侵犯预防项目的影响。
Violence Vict. 2012;27(4):563-79. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.27.4.563.
2
Students as Prosocial Bystanders to Sexual Assault: Demographic Correlates of Intervention Norms, Intentions, and Missed Opportunities.学生作为性侵犯的亲社会旁观者:干预规范、意图和错失机会的人口统计学相关因素。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Feb;35(3-4):731-754. doi: 10.1177/0886260517689888. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
3
Implications for sexual assault prevention: college students as prosocial bystanders.对性侵预防的启示:大学生作为亲社会的旁观者。
J Am Coll Health. 2011;59(7):655-7. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2010.515633.
4
When can I help? A conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention.何时能帮上忙?通过旁观者干预预防性暴力的概念框架。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2012 Jan;13(1):3-14. doi: 10.1177/1524838011426015. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
5
"Yeah, We Serve Alcohol, but … We Are Here to Help": A Qualitative Analysis of Bar Staff's Perceptions of Sexual Violence.“是的,我们提供酒水,但是……我们是来提供帮助的”:对酒吧工作人员对性暴力认知的定性分析
Violence Vict. 2016;31(4):692-707. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00047. Epub 2016 May 27.
6
"Campus Craft": A Game for Sexual Assault Prevention in Universities.“校园技艺”:一款大学预防性侵犯的游戏。
Games Health J. 2015 Apr;4(2):95-106. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2014.0056. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
7
Coach Expectations About Off-Field Conduct and Bystander Intervention by U.S. College Football Players to Prevent Inappropriate Sexual Behavior.教练对美国大学足球运动员场外行为和旁观者干预的期望,以防止不当性行为。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Jan;33(2):293-315. doi: 10.1177/0886260515605122. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
8
Beyond the Situational Model: Bystander Action Consequences to Intervening in Situations Involving Sexual Violence.超越情境模型:在涉及性暴力的情境中进行干预的旁观者行为后果。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Oct;33(20):3211-3231. doi: 10.1177/0886260516635319. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
9
"She Wasn't Resisting": Students' Barriers to Prosocial Intervention as Bystanders to Sexual Assault Risk Situations.“她没有反抗”:作为性侵犯风险情境的旁观者,学生进行亲社会干预的障碍。
Violence Against Women. 2019 Mar;25(4):485-505. doi: 10.1177/1077801218790697. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
10
Sexual Assault Supportive Attitudes: Rape Myth Acceptance and Token Resistance in Greek and Non-Greek College Students From Two University Samples in the United States.性侵犯支持态度:美国两所大学的希腊裔和非希腊裔大学生中的强奸谬论接受和象征性抵制。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Nov;33(22):3502-3530. doi: 10.1177/0886260516636064. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Catalysts of violence against women students: the role of the university, aggressors, and victims.针对女学生暴力行为的催化剂:大学、攻击者及受害者的角色。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 13;15:1360192. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360192. eCollection 2024.
2
UK and Australian University Students' Perceptions of the Nature of Sexual Assault and Intervening Behavior.英国和澳大利亚大学生对性侵犯本质和干预行为的看法。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 May;39(9-10):1952-1975. doi: 10.1177/08862605231212171. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
3
Alcohol Intoxication Impairs the Bystander Intervention Process in a Hypothetical Sexual Assault: A Field Investigation.
酒精中毒会损害假设性性侵犯中的旁观者干预过程:一项现场调查。
Psychol Violence. 2020 Nov;10(6):657-666. doi: 10.1037/vio0000283. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
4
Bystander Intervention to Prevent Sexual Violence: The Overlooked Role of Bystander Alcohol Intoxication.旁观者干预预防性暴力:旁观者酒精中毒被忽视的作用。
Psychol Violence. 2018 Sep;8(5):639-647. doi: 10.1037/vio0000155. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
5
Friends, strangers, and bystanders: Informal practices of sexual assault intervention.朋友、陌生人及旁观者:性侵犯干预的非正式实践。
Glob Public Health. 2019 Jan;14(1):53-64. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1472290. Epub 2018 May 7.
6
Bystander Programs: Accommodating or Derailing Sexism?旁观者计划:是包容性别歧视还是使其偏离正轨?
Behav Sci (Basel). 2017 Sep 27;7(4):65. doi: 10.3390/bs7040065. eCollection 2017 Dec.
7
Bystander Action in Situations of Dating and Sexual Aggression: A Mixed Methodological Study of High School Youth.约会与性侵犯情境中的旁观者行为:一项针对高中生的混合方法研究
J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Dec;44(12):2321-36. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0307-z. Epub 2015 Jun 6.