• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对急诊科出院医嘱的理解:知识缺陷最大的地方在哪里?

Patient understanding of emergency department discharge instructions: where are knowledge deficits greatest?

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine , Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;19(9):E1035-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01425.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01425.x
PMID:22978730
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Many patients are discharged from the emergency department (ED) with an incomplete understanding of the information needed to safely care for themselves at home. Patients have demonstrated particular difficulty in understanding post-ED care instructions (including medications, home care, and follow-up). The objective of this study was to further characterize these deficits and identify gaps in knowledge that may place the patient at risk for complications or poor outcomes.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort, phone interview-based study of 159 adult English-speaking patients within 24 to 36 hours of ED discharge. Patient knowledge was assessed for five diagnoses (ankle sprain, back pain, head injury, kidney stone, and laceration) across the following five domains: diagnosis, medications, home care, follow-up, and return instructions. Knowledge was determined based on the concordance between direct patient recall and diagnosis-specific discharge instructions combined with chart review. Two authors scored each case independently and discussed discrepancies before providing a final score for each domain (no, minimal, partial, or complete comprehension). Descriptive statistics were used for the analyses.

RESULTS

The study population was 50% female with a median age of 41 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 29 to 53 years). Knowledge deficits were demonstrated by the majority of patients in the domain of home care instructions (80%) and return instructions (79%). Less frequent deficits were found for the domains of follow-up (39%), medications (22%), and diagnosis (14%). Minimal or no understanding in at least one domain was demonstrated by greater than two-thirds of patients and was found in 40% of cases for home care and 51% for return instructions. These deficits occurred less frequently for domains of follow-up (18%), diagnosis (3%), and medications (3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients demonstrate the most frequent knowledge deficits for home care and return instructions, raising significant concerns for adherence and outcomes.

摘要

目的

许多患者从急诊科(ED)出院时,对在家安全护理所需的信息理解不完整。患者在理解 ED 后护理说明(包括药物、家庭护理和随访)方面尤其困难。本研究的目的是进一步描述这些缺陷,并确定可能使患者面临并发症或不良结局风险的知识差距。

方法

这是一项前瞻性队列、基于电话访谈的研究,在 ED 出院后 24 至 36 小时内纳入了 159 名成年英语患者。通过以下五个领域评估患者对五种诊断(踝关节扭伤、背痛、头部损伤、肾结石和裂伤)的知识:诊断、药物、家庭护理、随访和返回说明。知识是根据直接患者回忆与特定诊断的出院说明的一致性以及图表审查确定的。两位作者独立对每个病例进行评分,并在提供每个领域的最终评分之前讨论差异(无、最小、部分或完全理解)。分析采用描述性统计。

结果

研究人群中 50%为女性,中位数年龄为 41 岁(四分位距 [IQR] = 29 至 53 岁)。大多数患者在家庭护理说明(80%)和返回说明(79%)领域存在知识缺陷。随访(39%)、药物(22%)和诊断(14%)领域发现的缺陷较少。超过三分之二的患者在至少一个领域表现出轻微或完全不理解,其中 40%的家庭护理和 51%的返回说明存在这种情况。在随访(18%)、诊断(3%)和药物(3%)领域,这些缺陷发生的频率较低。

结论

患者在家庭护理和返回说明方面表现出最频繁的知识缺陷,这对治疗依从性和结局提出了重大担忧。

相似文献

1
Patient understanding of emergency department discharge instructions: where are knowledge deficits greatest?患者对急诊科出院医嘱的理解:知识缺陷最大的地方在哪里?
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;19(9):E1035-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01425.x.
2
Patient comprehension of emergency department care and instructions: are patients aware of when they do not understand?患者对急诊科护理及医嘱的理解:患者是否意识到自己何时不理解?
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;53(4):454-461.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.05.016. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
3
Older patients' understanding of emergency department discharge information and its relationship with adverse outcomes.老年患者对急诊科出院信息的理解及其与不良结局的关系。
J Patient Saf. 2011 Mar;7(1):19-25. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e31820c7678.
4
Recall of discharge advice given to patients with minor head injury presenting to a Singapore emergency department.对前往新加坡急诊科就诊的轻度头部受伤患者出院建议的回顾。
Singapore Med J. 2007 Dec;48(12):1107-10.
5
An emergency department-based nurse discharge coordinator for elder patients: does it make a difference?一名基于急诊科的老年患者出院协调护士:这有区别吗?
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1318-27. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.07.006.
6
Characteristics of pediatric patients at risk of poor emergency department aftercare.存在急诊后护理不佳风险的儿科患者的特征。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Aug;13(8):840-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.04.021.
7
Using video discharge instructions as an adjunct to standard written instructions improved caregivers' understanding of their child's emergency department visit, plan, and follow-up: a randomized controlled trial.将视频出院指导作为标准书面指导的辅助手段,可提高护理人员对其孩子急诊科就诊情况、治疗计划及后续跟进的理解:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Jun;29(6):699-704. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182955480.
8
Emergency department discharge instructions and patient literacy: a problem of disparity.急诊科出院指导与患者文化程度:一个差异问题。
Am J Emerg Med. 1996 Jan;14(1):19-22. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90006-6.
9
The recidivism characteristics of an emergency department observation unit.急诊科观察单元的累犯特征。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;56(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
10
Problems and unmet needs of patients discharged "home to self-care".“回家自我护理”出院患者的问题及未满足的需求
Prof Case Manag. 2011 Sep-Oct;16(5):240-50; quiz 251-2. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0b013e31822361d8.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the gaps: A comprehensive, equity-focused observational examination of Emergency Department discharge.揭示差距:一项针对急诊科出院情况的全面、关注公平性的观察性调查。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 28;20(8):e0331226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331226. eCollection 2025.
2
Patient recall of postoperative protocols following hand surgery does not differ by information provider: a randomized clinical trial.手部手术后患者对术后方案的记忆不因信息提供者而异:一项随机临床试验。
Front Surg. 2025 May 30;12:1559161. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1559161. eCollection 2025.
3
Improving Patient Understanding of Emergency Department Discharge Instructions.
提高患者对急诊科出院指导的理解。
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;25(6):917-920. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18579.
4
ChatGPT's Role in Improving Education Among Patients Seeking Emergency Medical Treatment.ChatGPT 在改善寻求急诊医疗的患者的教育中的作用。
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;25(5):845-855. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18650.
5
Access to the internet and mobile applications in a mixed population emergency department: A repeated cross-sectional survey.混合人群急诊科中互联网和移动应用程序的使用情况:一项重复横断面调查。
PEC Innov. 2024 Sep 12;5:100340. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100340. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
6
Discharge instruction comprehension by older adults in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta-analysis.急诊科老年患者出院指导理解情况的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;31(11):1165-1172. doi: 10.1111/acem.15013. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
7
Identifying Facilitators and Inhibitors of Shared Understanding: An Ethnography of Diagnosis Communication in Acute Medical Settings.识别共享理解的促进因素和障碍:急性医疗环境中诊断沟通的民族志研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14180. doi: 10.1111/hex.14180.
8
Discharge Interventions for Limited English Proficiency Patients: A Scoping Review.针对英语水平有限患者的出院干预措施:一项范围综述
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Jun;12(3):1737-1744. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02003-2. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
9
Improving the Quality and Completeness of Discharge Summaries at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan: A Quality Improvement Project.提高巴基斯坦一家三级护理医院出院小结的质量和完整性:一项质量改进项目。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 14;16(3):e56134. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56134. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Emergency Department-to-Community Transitions of Care: Best Practices for the Older Adult Population.急诊科到社区的过渡护理:老年人群的最佳实践。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2023 Nov;39(4):659-672. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2023.05.009. Epub 2023 Jun 14.