INRA, UMR1347 Agroécologie, Dijon, France.
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044279. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
Soil DNA extraction has become a critical step in describing microbial biodiversity. Historically, ascertaining overarching microbial ecological theories has been hindered as independent studies have used numerous custom and commercial DNA extraction procedures. For that reason, a standardized soil DNA extraction method (ISO-11063) was previously published. However, although this ISO method is suited for molecular tools such as quantitative PCR and community fingerprinting techniques, it has only been optimized for examining soil bacteria. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess an appropriate soil DNA extraction procedure for examining bacterial, archaeal and fungal diversity in soils of contrasting land-use and physico-chemical properties. Three different procedures were tested: the ISO-11063 standard; a custom procedure (GnS-GII); and a modified ISO procedure (ISOm) which includes a different mechanical lysis step (a FastPrep ®-24 lysis step instead of the recommended bead-beating). The efficacy of each method was first assessed by estimating microbial biomass through total DNA quantification. Then, the abundances and community structure of bacteria, archaea and fungi were determined using real-time PCR and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism approaches. Results showed that DNA yield was improved with the GnS-GII and ISOm procedures, and fungal community patterns were found to be strongly dependent on the extraction method. The main methodological factor responsible for differences between extraction procedure efficiencies was found to be the soil homogenization step. For integrative studies which aim to examine bacteria, archaea and fungi simultaneously, the ISOm procedure results in higher DNA recovery and better represents microbial communities.
土壤 DNA 提取已成为描述微生物生物多样性的关键步骤。从历史上看,由于独立研究使用了多种定制和商业 DNA 提取程序,因此确定总体微生物生态理论受到了阻碍。出于这个原因,之前发布了一种标准化的土壤 DNA 提取方法(ISO-11063)。然而,尽管这种 ISO 方法适用于定量 PCR 和群落指纹图谱技术等分子工具,但它仅针对土壤细菌进行了优化。因此,本研究的目的是评估一种合适的土壤 DNA 提取程序,用于检查不同土地利用和理化性质土壤中的细菌、古菌和真菌多样性。测试了三种不同的程序:ISO-11063 标准;定制程序(GnS-GII);和改良的 ISO 程序(ISOm),其中包括不同的机械裂解步骤(FastPrep ®-24 裂解步骤代替推荐的珠磨)。首先通过总 DNA 定量来评估每种方法的微生物生物量来评估每种方法的功效。然后,使用实时 PCR 和末端限制性片段长度多态性方法确定细菌、古菌和真菌的丰度和群落结构。结果表明,GnS-GII 和 ISOm 程序提高了 DNA 产量,并且真菌群落模式强烈依赖于提取方法。发现导致提取程序效率差异的主要方法因素是土壤均化步骤。对于旨在同时检查细菌、古菌和真菌的综合研究,ISOm 程序可导致更高的 DNA 回收率并更好地代表微生物群落。