Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Sep 19;9:116. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-116.
This study systematically reviewed the evidence pertaining to socioeconomic inequalities in different domains of physical activity (PA) by European region.
Studies conducted between January 2000 and December 2010 were identified by a systematic search in Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Psychinfo, Sportdiscus, Sociological Abstracts, and Social Service Abstracts. English-language peer-reviewed studies undertaken in the general population of adults (18-65 years) were classified by domain of PA (total, leisure-time including sport, occupational, active transport), indicator of socioeconomic position (education, income, occupation), and European region. Distributions of reported positive, negative, and null associations were evaluated.
A total of 131 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in Scandinavia (n = 47). Leisure-time PA was the most frequently studied PA outcome (n = 112). Considerable differences in the direction of inequalities were seen for the different domains of PA. Most studies reported that those with high socioeconomic position were more physically active during leisure-time compared to those with low socioeconomic position (68% positive associations for total leisure-time PA, 76% for vigorous leisure-time PA). Occupational PA was more prevalent among the lower socioeconomic groups (63% negative associations). Socioeconomic differences in total PA and active transport PA did not show a consistent pattern (40% and 38% positive associations respectively). Some inequalities differed by European region or socioeconomic indicator, however these differences were not very pronounced.
The direction of socioeconomic inequalities in PA in Europe differed considerably by domain of PA. The contradictory results for total PA may partly be explained by contrasting socioeconomic patterns for leisure-time PA and occupational PA.
本研究系统地回顾了欧洲不同领域身体活动(PA)的社会经济不平等的证据。
通过在 Pubmed、Embase、Web of Science、Psychinfo、Sportdiscus、Sociological Abstracts 和 Social Service Abstracts 中进行系统搜索,确定了 2000 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月期间进行的研究。以 PA 的领域(总 PA、包括运动的休闲时间 PA、职业 PA、主动交通 PA)、社会经济地位指标(教育、收入、职业)和欧洲地区对以英语撰写的、在普通成年人群(18-65 岁)中进行的同行评审研究进行分类。评估报告的正、负和中性关联的分布情况。
共有 131 项符合纳入标准的研究。大多数研究在斯堪的纳维亚(n = 47)进行。休闲时间 PA 是最常研究的 PA 结果(n = 112)。不同 PA 领域的不平等方向存在很大差异。大多数研究报告称,高社会经济地位的人在休闲时间比低社会经济地位的人更活跃(总休闲时间 PA 的 68%为正相关,剧烈休闲时间 PA 的 76%为正相关)。职业 PA 在社会经济地位较低的群体中更为普遍(63%为负相关)。总 PA 和主动交通 PA 的社会经济差异没有呈现一致的模式(分别为 40%和 38%的正相关)。一些不平等因欧洲地区或社会经济指标而异,但这些差异并不明显。
欧洲 PA 的社会经济不平等的方向因 PA 的领域而异。对总 PA 的矛盾结果部分可以通过休闲时间 PA 和职业 PA 的社会经济模式的对比来解释。