Suppr超能文献

成年人体力活动问卷:测量特性的系统评价。

Physical activity questionnaires for adults: a systematic review of measurement properties.

机构信息

Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Sports Med. 2010 Jul 1;40(7):565-600. doi: 10.2165/11531930-000000000-00000.

Abstract

Many questionnaires have been developed to measure physical activity (PA), but an overview of the measurement properties of PA questionnaires is lacking. A summary of this information is useful for choosing the best questionnaire available. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate and compare measurement properties of self-administered questionnaires assessing PA in adults. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and SportDiscus, using 'exercise', 'physical activity', 'motor activity' and 'questionnaire' as keywords. We included studies that evaluated the measurement properties of self-report questionnaires assessing PA. Article selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. The quality and results of the studies were evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires (QAPAQ) checklist. Construct validity, reliability and responsiveness were rated as positive, negative or indeterminate, depending on the methods and results. We included 85 (versions of) questionnaires. Overall, the quality of the studies assessing measurement properties of PA questionnaires was rather poor. Information on content validity was mostly lacking. Construct validity was assessed in 76 of the questionnaires, mostly by correlations with accelerometer data, maximal oxygen uptake or activity diaries. Fifty-one questionnaires were tested for reliability. Only a few questionnaires had sufficient construct validity and reliability, but these need to be further validated. Responsiveness was studied for only two questionnaires and was poor. There is a clear lack of standardization of PA questionnaires, resulting in many variations of questionnaires. No questionnaire or type of questionnaire for assessing PA was superior and therefore could not be strongly recommended above others. In the future, more attention should be paid to the methodology of studies assessing measurement properties of PA questionnaires and the quality of reporting.

摘要

许多问卷被开发出来用于测量身体活动(PA),但缺乏对 PA 问卷测量特性的概述。总结这些信息对于选择最佳可用问卷非常有用。因此,本研究的目的是评估和比较评估成年人 PA 的自我管理问卷的测量特性。我们使用“运动”、“身体活动”、“运动活动”和“问卷”作为关键词,在 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 SportDiscus 中进行了搜索。我们纳入了评估 PA 自我报告问卷测量特性的研究。文章选择、数据提取和质量评估由两名独立的审查员进行。使用《体力活动问卷质量评估(QAPAQ)检查表》评估研究的质量和结果。根据方法和结果,构建效度、信度和反应性被评为阳性、阴性或不确定。我们纳入了 85 份(版本)问卷。总体而言,评估 PA 问卷测量特性的研究的质量相当差。关于内容效度的信息大多缺乏。76 份问卷评估了构建效度,主要通过与加速度计数据、最大摄氧量或活动日记的相关性进行评估。51 份问卷进行了可靠性测试。只有少数问卷具有足够的构建效度和可靠性,但这些需要进一步验证。只有两份问卷研究了反应性,且效果不佳。PA 问卷缺乏标准化,导致问卷种类繁多。没有一种问卷或类型的问卷在评估 PA 方面具有优势,因此不能强烈推荐优于其他问卷。未来,应更加关注评估 PA 问卷测量特性的研究方法和报告质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验