Suppr超能文献

使用特异性IgE和皮肤点刺试验来确定临床反应严重程度。

Use of Specific IgE and Skin Prick Test to Determine Clinical Reaction Severity.

作者信息

Ta Von, Weldon Brittany, Yu Grace, Humblet Olivier, Neale-May Susan, Nadeau Kari

机构信息

2351 Clay Street, Suite 380, San Francisco, CA 94115, Department of Internal Medicine, California Pacific Medical Center, California, United States.

出版信息

Br J Med Med Res. 2011;1(4):410-429. doi: 10.9734/bjmmr/2011/711.

Abstract

AIMS

To determine whether specific IgE and skin prick test correlate better in predicting reaction severity during a double-blinded placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) for egg, milk, and multiple tree nut allergens. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, August 2009 and ongoing. METHODOLOGY: We examined the reaction severity of twenty-four subjects to nine possible food allergens: milk, egg, almond, cashew, hazelnut, peanut, sesame, pecan and walnut. Specific IgE and SPT were performed before each DBPCFC. DBPCFC results were classified into mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3) reactions using a modified Bock's criteria. RESULTS: Twenty four subjects underwent a total of 80 DBPCFC. Eighty percent of all DBPCFCs resulted in a positive reaction. A majority, 71%, were classified as mild. No reactions occurred with a SPT of zero mm while three reactions occurred with a negative specific IgE. All reactions were reversible with medication. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that SPT and specific IgE levels are not associated with reaction severity (p<0.64 and 0.27, respectively). We also found that combining specific IgE and SPT improved specificity but did not help to achieve clinically useful sensitivity. For instance, an SPT > 5mm had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 50%. Combining SPT > 5mm and IgE > 7 resulted in a reduced sensitivity of 64%. Unexpectedly, a history of anaphylaxis 70% (n=17) was not predictive of anaphylaxis on challenge 4% (n=2).

摘要

目的

确定在针对鸡蛋、牛奶和多种坚果过敏原的双盲安慰剂对照食物激发试验(DBPCFC)中,特异性IgE和皮肤点刺试验在预测反应严重程度方面是否具有更好的相关性。

研究设计

前瞻性研究。

研究地点和时间

斯坦福大学医学院儿科学系,2009年8月至今。

方法

我们检查了24名受试者对9种可能的食物过敏原的反应严重程度:牛奶、鸡蛋、杏仁、腰果、榛子、花生、芝麻、山核桃和核桃。在每次DBPCFC之前进行特异性IgE和皮肤点刺试验。使用改良的博克标准将DBPCFC结果分为轻度(1级)、中度(2级)或重度(3级)反应。

结果

24名受试者共进行了80次DBPCFC。所有DBPCFC中有80%产生了阳性反应。大多数(71%)被归类为轻度。皮肤点刺试验为0毫米时未发生反应,而特异性IgE为阴性时发生了3次反应。所有反应均可通过药物逆转。

结论

这些数据表明,皮肤点刺试验和特异性IgE水平与反应严重程度无关(p分别<0.64和0.27)。我们还发现,将特异性IgE和皮肤点刺试验相结合可提高特异性,但无助于实现临床有用的敏感性。例如,皮肤点刺试验>5毫米时敏感性为91%,特异性为50%。将皮肤点刺试验>5毫米和IgE>7相结合导致敏感性降低至64%。出乎意料的是,70%(n = 17)有过敏反应史的患者在激发试验时未发生过敏反应,4%(n = 2)发生了过敏反应。

相似文献

1
Use of Specific IgE and Skin Prick Test to Determine Clinical Reaction Severity.
Br J Med Med Res. 2011;1(4):410-429. doi: 10.9734/bjmmr/2011/711.
2
Association of Clinical Reactivity with Sensitization to Allergen Components in Multifood-Allergic Children.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1325-1334.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.01.016. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
3
Correlations between basophil activation, allergen-specific IgE with outcome and severity of oral food challenges.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Apr;114(4):319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.01.006.
4
Predicting reactivity threshold in children with anaphylaxis to peanut.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2018 Apr;48(4):415-423. doi: 10.1111/cea.13078. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
5
Improved screening for peanut allergy by the combined use of skin prick tests and specific IgE assays.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Jun;109(6):1027-33. doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.124775.
7
BSACI guideline for the diagnosis and management of peanut and tree nut allergy.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2017 Jun;47(6):719-739. doi: 10.1111/cea.12957.
8
Skin prick test responses and allergen-specific IgE levels as predictors of peanut, egg, and sesame allergy in infants.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Oct;132(4):874-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.05.038. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
9
Relationship between food-specific IgE concentrations and the risk of positive food challenges in children and adolescents.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Oct;100(4):444-51. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70133-7.
10
Measurement and interpretation of skin prick test results.
Clin Transl Allergy. 2016 Feb 23;6:8. doi: 10.1186/s13601-016-0092-0. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
From bite to brain: Neuro-immune interactions in food allergy.
Allergy. 2024 Dec;79(12):3326-3340. doi: 10.1111/all.16366. Epub 2024 Oct 27.
2
Whence and wherefore IgE?
Immunol Rev. 2024 Sep;326(1):48-65. doi: 10.1111/imr.13373. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Unusual anaphylaxis induced by food allergen inhalation or skin contact.
Asia Pac Allergy. 2024 Jun;14(2):93-96. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000118. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
4
Acute systemic myeloid inflammatory and stress response in severe food allergic reactions.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2023 May;53(5):536-549. doi: 10.1111/cea.14273. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
5
Estimating the Risk of Severe Peanut Allergy Using Clinical Background and IgE Sensitization Profiles.
Front Allergy. 2021 Jun 7;2:670789. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2021.670789. eCollection 2021.
7
Change in exhaled nitric oxide during peanut challenge is related to severity of reaction.
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 Jul 21;16:64. doi: 10.1186/s13223-020-00464-8. eCollection 2020.
8
Biomarkers of severity and threshold of allergic reactions during oral peanut challenges.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Aug;146(2):344-355. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.03.035. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
10
Anti-IgE treatment with oral immunotherapy in multifood allergic participants: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb;3(2):85-94. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30392-8. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Future therapies for food allergies.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar;127(3):558-73; quiz 574-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1098. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
2
Quantification of specific IgE to whole peanut extract and peanut components in prediction of peanut allergy.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar;127(3):684-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.012. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
3
Single-tree nut immunotherapy attenuates allergic reactions in mice with hypersensitivity to multiple tree nuts.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jan;127(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.09.014. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
4
US prevalence of self-reported peanut, tree nut, and sesame allergy: 11-year follow-up.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Jun;125(6):1322-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.03.029. Epub 2010 May 11.
5
Allergy or tolerance in children sensitized to peanut: prevalence and differentiation using component-resolved diagnostics.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Jan;125(1):191-7.e1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.10.008.
6
Work Group report: oral food challenge testing.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Jun;123(6 Suppl):S365-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.03.042.
7
Specific oral tolerance induction in children with very severe cow's milk-induced reactions.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Feb;121(2):343-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.10.029. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
8
Specific oral tolerance induction in food allergy in children: efficacy and clinical patterns of reaction.
Allergy. 2007 Nov;62(11):1261-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01501.x.
9
Peanut allergy: emerging concepts and approaches for an apparent epidemic.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Sep;120(3):491-503; quiz 504-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.07.015. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
10
Combining skin prick, immediate skin application and specific-IgE testing in the diagnosis of peanut allergy in children.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2007 May;18(3):231-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2007.00517.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验