School of Sports and Exercise Sciences, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Rome, Italy.
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Jul;27(7):1904-19. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182736adf.
The purpose of this investigation was to determine if there were different trends in physical fatigue observed in 3 different sets, of 7 trials each, in repeated sprint training, performed in 3 different modes: straight sprinting over 30 m, shuttle sprinting over 15 + 15 m, and sprinting over 30 m with changes of direction. Recovery time among trials in the sets was administered according to the 1:5 exercise to rest ratio. The sets were performed on 3 different days, with at least 48 hours between each set. The study involved 17 trained male soccer players (height, 177.33 ± 6.21 cm; body mass, 71.63 ± 9.58 kg; body mass index, 23 ± 2.39 kg·m; age, 21.94 ± 3.58 years). To compare the different values of the time recorded, an index of fatigue was used. Significant differences among trials within each set (repeated measures analysis of variance; p < 0.05) and between the sets (factorial analysis of variance; p < 0.001) were found. Significant correlations between each test and countermovement jump and stiffness values recorded pre exercise were found (p < 0.05). Significant differences between countermovement jump and stiffness values recorded pre and post exercise were also found (p < 0.05). This study suggests that training sessions aimed at increasing the capacity of repeated sprint ability in nonlinear and multidirectional sprints (shuttle and change of direction), which might imply a different number of trials within the set or different exercise to rest ratios from the ones usually adopted for straight sprinting, to induce similar trends of fatigue. As practical applications, the estimated numbers of necessary trials in the different sets and the possible exercise to rest ratios, resulting from mathematical modeling, are provided for each investigated sprinting mode.
本研究旨在确定在三种不同模式下进行的 7 次重复冲刺训练中,是否存在 30 米直线冲刺、15+15 米折返冲刺和 30 米变向冲刺这三种不同的体能疲劳趋势。在每组的试验中,根据 1:5 的运动与休息比例来安排恢复时间。这些组在三天内进行,每组之间至少间隔 48 小时。该研究涉及 17 名受过训练的男性足球运动员(身高 177.33±6.21cm;体重 71.63±9.58kg;体重指数 23±2.39kg·m;年龄 21.94±3.58 岁)。为了比较不同时间记录值之间的差异,使用了疲劳指数。在每组内的试验之间(重复测量方差分析;p<0.05)和组之间(析因方差分析;p<0.001)都发现了显著差异。还发现每个测试与运动前记录的纵跳和硬度值之间存在显著相关性(p<0.05)。运动前和运动后记录的纵跳和硬度值之间也存在显著差异(p<0.05)。本研究表明,旨在提高非线性和多向冲刺(折返和变向)重复冲刺能力的训练课程,可能需要在每组内增加试验次数或改变运动与休息的比例,以产生类似的疲劳趋势。作为实际应用,为每个研究的冲刺模式提供了不同组所需的估计试验次数和可能的运动与休息比例,这些结果来自数学建模。