Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Essen, Virchowstrasse 179, D-45147 Essen, Germany.
J Hosp Infect. 2012 Dec;82(4):277-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Sep 23.
Three ethanol-based sanitizers were compared with three antimicrobial liquid soaps for their efficacy to inactivate polio-, adeno-, vaccinia- and bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) as well as feline calicivirus (FCV) and murine norovirus (MNV) as surrogates for human norovirus in a suspension test. Additionally, sanitizers and soaps were examined against MNV in a modified fingerpad method. All sanitizers sufficiently inactivated the test viruses in the suspension test whereas two soaps were active only against vaccinia virus and BVDV. In the modified fingerpad test a povidone-iodine-containing soap was superior to the sanitizers whereas the other two soaps showed no activity.
三种基于乙醇的消毒剂与三种抗菌液体皂在悬浮试验中对脊髓灰质炎、腺病毒、牛痘病毒和牛病毒性腹泻病毒(BVDV)以及猫杯状病毒(FCV)和鼠诺如病毒(MNV)(作为人类诺如病毒的替代物)的灭活效果进行了比较。此外,还在改良的指腹试验中对消毒剂和肥皂进行了针对 MNV 的检测。所有消毒剂在悬浮试验中都能充分灭活试验病毒,而两种肥皂仅对牛痘病毒和 BVDV 有效。在改良的指腹试验中,一种含聚维酮碘的肥皂优于消毒剂,而另外两种肥皂则没有活性。