MRC SGDP Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, London, UK.
Schizophr Bull. 2012 Nov;38(6):1118-23. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs096. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
The association between urbanicity and risk of schizophrenia is well established. The incidence of schizophrenia has been observed to increase in line with rising levels of urbanicity, as measured in terms of population size or density. This association is expressed as Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR), and the results are usually presented by comparing the most urban with the most rural environment. In this study, we undertook to express the effect of urbanicity on the risk of schizophrenia in a linear form and to perform a meta-analysis of all available evidence. We first employed a simple regression analysis of log (IRR) as given in each study on the urbanicity category, assuming a uniform distribution and a linear association. In order to obtain more accurate estimates, we developed a more sophisticated method that generates individual data points with simulation from the summary data presented in the original studies, and then fits a logistic regression model. The estimates from each study were combined with meta-analysis. Despite the challenges that arise from differences between studies as regards to the number and relative size of urbanicity levels, a linear association was observed between the logarithm of the odds of risk for schizophrenia and urbanicity. The risk for schizophrenia at the most urban environment was estimated to be 2.37 times higher than in the most rural environment. The same effect was found when studies measuring the risk for nonaffective psychosis were included.
城市化与精神分裂症风险之间的关联已得到充分证实。精神分裂症的发病率随着城市化水平的提高而增加,城市化水平可以用人口规模或密度来衡量。这种关联以发病率比(IRR)表示,结果通常通过比较最城市化和最农村的环境来呈现。在这项研究中,我们试图以线性形式表达城市化对精神分裂症风险的影响,并对所有可用证据进行荟萃分析。我们首先对每个研究中城市化类别的对数(IRR)进行简单的回归分析,假设均匀分布和线性关联。为了获得更准确的估计,我们开发了一种更复杂的方法,该方法可以从原始研究中呈现的汇总数据中模拟生成单个数据点,然后拟合逻辑回归模型。从每个研究中得出的估计值与荟萃分析相结合。尽管由于研究之间在城市化水平的数量和相对大小方面存在差异而带来了挑战,但在精神分裂症风险的几率对数与城市化之间观察到了线性关联。最城市化环境下的精神分裂症风险估计比最农村环境下的风险高 2.37 倍。当纳入测量非情感性精神病风险的研究时,也发现了相同的效果。