Suppr超能文献

一项针对荷兰和英国监管警告的媒体报道对抗抑郁药使用影响的 10 年分析。

A 10-year analysis of the effects of media coverage of regulatory warnings on antidepressant use in The Netherlands and UK.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045515. Epub 2012 Sep 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2003-2004 and 2007-2008, the regulatory banning of SSRI use in pediatrics and young adults due to concerns regarding suicidality risk coincided with negative media coverage. SSRI use trends were analyzed from 2000-2010 in the Netherlands (NL) and the UK, and whether trend changes might be associated with media coverage of regulatory warnings.

METHODS

Monthly SSRIs sales were presented as DDDs/1000 inhabitants/day. SSRI-use trends were studied using time-series segmented regression analyses. Timing of trend changes was compared with two periods of media coverage of warnings. Annual Dutch SSRI prescription data were analyzed by age group.

RESULTS

Trend changes in SSRI use largely corroborated with the periods of media coverage of warnings. British SSRI use declined from 3.9 to 0.7 DDDs/month (95%CI 3.3;4.5 & 0.5;0.9, respectively) before the first warning period (2003-2004). A small decrease of -0.6 DDDs/month (-1.2; -0.05) was observed in Dutch SSRI use shortly after 2003-2004. From 2007-2008, British SSRI use stabilized, whilst Dutch SSRI use diminished to -0.04 DDDs/month (-0.4;0.3). Stratified analyses showed a rapid decrease of -1.2 DDDs/month (-2.1; -1.7) in UK paroxetine use before 2003-2004, but only a minimal change in Dutch paroxetine use (-0.3 DDDs/month -0.8;0.2). Other SSRI use, especially (es)citalopram, increased during 2003-2004 in both countries. Significant reductions in Dutch paroxetine use were observed in pediatrics, adolescents, and young adults after 2003-2004.

CONCLUSION

Changes in SSRI use (NL & UK) were associated with the timing of the combined effect of media coverage and regulatory warnings. Our long-term assessment illustrates that changes in SSRI use were temporal, drug-specific and more pronounced in pediatrics and young adults. The twofold increase in SSRI use over one decade indicates that regulatory warnings and media coverage may come and go, but they do not have a significant impact on the overall upward trend of SSRI use as a class in both countries.

摘要

背景

2003-2004 年和 2007-2008 年,由于对自杀风险的担忧,监管部门禁止在儿科和年轻成年人中使用 SSRI,同时伴随着负面媒体报道。本研究分析了 2000-2010 年荷兰(NL)和英国的 SSRI 使用趋势,以及趋势变化是否可能与监管警告的媒体报道有关。

方法

每月 SSRI 销售量以 DDD/1000 居民/天表示。使用时间序列分段回归分析研究 SSRI 使用趋势。比较趋势变化的时间与两个监管警告媒体报道期。按年龄组分析荷兰 SSRI 处方数据。

结果

SSRI 使用趋势的变化与警告的媒体报道期基本一致。英国 SSRI 使用从警告第一个时期(2003-2004 年)前的 3.9 至 0.7 DDD/月(95%CI 3.3;4.5 和 0.5;0.9)。荷兰 SSRI 使用在 2003-2004 年后不久略有下降-0.6 DDD/月(-1.2; -0.05)。从 2007-2008 年起,英国 SSRI 使用稳定,而荷兰 SSRI 使用减少至-0.04 DDD/月(-0.4;0.3)。分层分析显示,英国帕罗西汀使用在 2003-2004 年前迅速下降-1.2 DDD/月(-2.1; -1.7),而荷兰帕罗西汀使用变化极小(-0.3 DDD/月-0.8;0.2)。两国 2003-2004 年期间,其他 SSRI 的使用,尤其是(es)西酞普兰,增加。荷兰帕罗西汀在儿科、青少年和年轻成年人中的使用在 2003-2004 年后显著减少。

结论

SSRI 使用变化(NL 和 UK)与媒体报道和监管警告的综合效应的时间有关。我们的长期评估表明,SSRI 使用的变化是暂时的、药物特异性的,在儿科和年轻成年人中更为明显。十年来 SSRI 使用量增加了一倍,这表明监管警告和媒体报道可能会来来去去,但它们并没有对两国 SSRI 类药物的整体上升趋势产生重大影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a40/3447767/3d6db1b97f85/pone.0045515.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验