Victoria Police Forensic Services Centre, 31 Forensic Drive, Macleod, Victoria 3085, Australia.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013 Jan;7(1):167-75. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
The circumstances surrounding deposition of DNA profiles are increasingly becoming an issue in court proceedings, especially whether or not the deposit was made by primary transfer. In order to improve the currently problematic evaluation of transfer scenarios in court proceedings, we examined the influence a variety of nine substrate types (six varieties of fabric, plywood, tarpaulin, and plastic sheets) has on DNA transfer involving blood. DNA transfer percentages were significantly higher (p=0.03) when the primary substrate was of non-porous material (such as tarpaulin, plastic or, to a lesser degree, wood) and the secondary substrate porous (such as fabrics). These findings on transfer percentages confirm the results of previous studies. Fabric composition was also shown to have a significant (p=0.03) effect on DNA transfer; when experiments were performed with friction from a variety of fabrics to a specific weave of cotton, transfer percentages ranged from 4% (flannelette) to 94% (acetate). The propensity for the same nine substrates to impact upon the efficiency of DNA extraction procedures was also examined. Significant (p=0.03) differences were found among the extraction efficiencies from different materials. When 15μL of blood was deposited on each of the substrates, the lowest quantity of DNA was extracted from plastic (20ng) and the highest quantities extracted from calico and flannelette (650ng). Significant (p<0.05) differences also exist among the DNA extraction yield from different initial blood volumes from all substrates. Also, significantly greater (p<0.05) loss of DNA was seen during concentration of extracts with higher compared to lower initial quantities of DNA. These findings suggest that the efficiency of extraction and concentration impacts upon the final amount of DNA available for analysis and that consideration of these effects should not be ignored. The application of correction factors to adjust for any variation among extraction and concentration efficiencies among substrates is proposed.
DNA 图谱的沉积环境在法庭程序中越来越成为一个问题,特别是沉积是否是通过直接转移完成的。为了改善法庭程序中转移情况评估目前存在的问题,我们研究了各种九种基质类型(六种织物、胶合板、防水油布和塑料片)对涉及血液的 DNA 转移的影响。当主要基质为非多孔材料(如防水油布、塑料或程度较小的木材)且次要基质为多孔材料(如织物)时,DNA 转移百分比显著更高(p=0.03)。这些关于转移百分比的发现证实了先前研究的结果。织物成分也显示出对 DNA 转移有显著影响(p=0.03);当用各种织物对特定的棉织物进行摩擦实验时,转移百分比从 4%(绒布)到 94%(醋酸纤维)不等。还检查了相同的九种基质对 DNA 提取程序效率的影响。发现从不同材料提取的效率之间存在显著差异(p=0.03)。当在每种基质上沉积 15μL 的血液时,从塑料中提取的 DNA 量最少(20ng),从府绸和绒布中提取的 DNA 量最多(650ng)。从所有基质的不同初始血液量中提取的 DNA 提取产量之间也存在显著差异(p<0.05)。此外,与初始 DNA 量较低的情况相比,在浓缩提取物时,会出现明显更多的 DNA 损失(p<0.05)。这些发现表明,提取和浓缩的效率会影响可用于分析的最终 DNA 量,不应忽视这些影响。建议应用校正因子来调整基质之间的提取和浓缩效率的任何差异。